{"title":"疫霉与神奇疫霉种间杂种的遗传分析","authors":"Stephen B Goodwin, William E Fry","doi":"10.1006/emyc.1994.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Goodwin, S. B., and Fry, W. E. 1994. Genetic analyses of interspecific hybrids between <em>Phytophthora infestans</em> and <em>Phytophthora mirabilis. Experimental Mycology</em> 18, 20-32. Four crosses were made between isolates of two host-specific <em>Phytophthora</em> species. <em>Phytophthora infestans</em> and <em>Phytophthora mirabilis</em>. In the two most successful crosses involving a common <em>P. infestans</em> A2 parent, allozyme analysis confirmed that 79 of 86 progeny were interspecific hybrids, 3 were presumed selfs, and 4 were either selfs or nonrecombinant parental types. Mating type, alleles at the allozyme locus glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, and the + alleles at a number of DNA fingerprinting loci segregated independently according to Mendelian expectation. Three DNA fingerprinting loci were tightly linked in <em>P. mirabilis</em>, but no other linkages were detected among these markers. Mitochondrial DNA was uniparentally inherited, mostly from the <em>P. infestans</em> parent. Growth rate segregated as a quantitative character. None of the 68 progeny tested infected <em>Mirabilis jalapa</em> (the host of <em>P. mirabilis</em>), 3 infected potato, and 4 were weakly pathogenic to tomato. Because most of the F<sub>1</sub> hybrids could not infect any of the hosts infected by the parents, host specialization could provide a postzygotic as well as a prezygotic reproductive isolating mechanism for <em>P. infestans</em> and <em>P. mirabilis</em> in central Mexico. These results indicate that <em>P. mirabilis</em> probably is capable of a regular outcrossing mating system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12110,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mycology","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/emyc.1994.1003","citationCount":"94","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic Analyses of Interspecific Hybrids between Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis\",\"authors\":\"Stephen B Goodwin, William E Fry\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/emyc.1994.1003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Goodwin, S. B., and Fry, W. E. 1994. Genetic analyses of interspecific hybrids between <em>Phytophthora infestans</em> and <em>Phytophthora mirabilis. Experimental Mycology</em> 18, 20-32. Four crosses were made between isolates of two host-specific <em>Phytophthora</em> species. <em>Phytophthora infestans</em> and <em>Phytophthora mirabilis</em>. In the two most successful crosses involving a common <em>P. infestans</em> A2 parent, allozyme analysis confirmed that 79 of 86 progeny were interspecific hybrids, 3 were presumed selfs, and 4 were either selfs or nonrecombinant parental types. Mating type, alleles at the allozyme locus glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, and the + alleles at a number of DNA fingerprinting loci segregated independently according to Mendelian expectation. Three DNA fingerprinting loci were tightly linked in <em>P. mirabilis</em>, but no other linkages were detected among these markers. Mitochondrial DNA was uniparentally inherited, mostly from the <em>P. infestans</em> parent. Growth rate segregated as a quantitative character. None of the 68 progeny tested infected <em>Mirabilis jalapa</em> (the host of <em>P. mirabilis</em>), 3 infected potato, and 4 were weakly pathogenic to tomato. Because most of the F<sub>1</sub> hybrids could not infect any of the hosts infected by the parents, host specialization could provide a postzygotic as well as a prezygotic reproductive isolating mechanism for <em>P. infestans</em> and <em>P. mirabilis</em> in central Mexico. These results indicate that <em>P. mirabilis</em> probably is capable of a regular outcrossing mating system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Mycology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/emyc.1994.1003\",\"citationCount\":\"94\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147597584710036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147597584710036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94
摘要
古德温,S. B.和弗莱,W. E. 1994。疫霉与神奇疫霉种间杂种的遗传分析。实验真菌学18,20-32。对两种寄主特异性疫霉菌株进行了4次杂交。疫霉和神奇疫霉。在两个最成功的杂交中,同工酶分析证实,86个后代中有79个是种间杂交,3个是假定的自交,4个是自交或非重组亲本型。配对型、同工酶位点葡萄糖-6-磷酸异构酶的等位基因和多个DNA指纹位点的+等位基因根据孟德尔期望独立分离。三个DNA指纹图谱位点在奇异假单胞菌中存在紧密的连锁,但在这些标记中未发现其他连锁。线粒体DNA是单代遗传的,主要来自病原菌的亲本。作为数量性状分离的增长率。68个子代均未感染紫茉莉,3个子代感染马铃薯,4个子代对番茄呈弱致病性。由于大多数F1杂交种不能感染任何被亲本感染的宿主,宿主专门化可能为墨西哥中部地区的寄生假单胞菌和奇异假单胞菌提供了合子后和合子前的生殖隔离机制。这些结果表明,奇异假单胞菌可能具有正常的异交交配系统。
Genetic Analyses of Interspecific Hybrids between Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis
Goodwin, S. B., and Fry, W. E. 1994. Genetic analyses of interspecific hybrids between Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis. Experimental Mycology 18, 20-32. Four crosses were made between isolates of two host-specific Phytophthora species. Phytophthora infestans and Phytophthora mirabilis. In the two most successful crosses involving a common P. infestans A2 parent, allozyme analysis confirmed that 79 of 86 progeny were interspecific hybrids, 3 were presumed selfs, and 4 were either selfs or nonrecombinant parental types. Mating type, alleles at the allozyme locus glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, and the + alleles at a number of DNA fingerprinting loci segregated independently according to Mendelian expectation. Three DNA fingerprinting loci were tightly linked in P. mirabilis, but no other linkages were detected among these markers. Mitochondrial DNA was uniparentally inherited, mostly from the P. infestans parent. Growth rate segregated as a quantitative character. None of the 68 progeny tested infected Mirabilis jalapa (the host of P. mirabilis), 3 infected potato, and 4 were weakly pathogenic to tomato. Because most of the F1 hybrids could not infect any of the hosts infected by the parents, host specialization could provide a postzygotic as well as a prezygotic reproductive isolating mechanism for P. infestans and P. mirabilis in central Mexico. These results indicate that P. mirabilis probably is capable of a regular outcrossing mating system.