管理上的困境:赶走大象,拯救大树

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Koedoe Pub Date : 2019-08-15 DOI:10.4102/KOEDOE.V61I1.1564
M. Henley, R. Cook
{"title":"管理上的困境:赶走大象,拯救大树","authors":"M. Henley, R. Cook","doi":"10.4102/KOEDOE.V61I1.1564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The loss of large trees ( 5 m in height) in Africa’s protected areas is often attributed to the impact by savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana). Concerns have been raised over large tree mortality levels in protected areas such as South Africa’s Kruger National Park (KNP) and in the past, the need to manage its elephant population in order to preserve large trees and biodiversity as a whole. Our review aims to synthesise and discuss the complexities of managing elephants’ effects on the landscape to ensure the survival of large trees, as well as the application purposes of the various lethal and non-lethal elephant mitigation strategies. We further critically evaluate past management strategies, which have solely focused on controlling elephant numbers to protect large trees. Past mitigation strategies focused on managing elephant impact by directly reducing elephant numbers. However, maintaining elephant numbers at a pre-determined carrying capacity level did not prevent the loss of large trees. Research on large tree survival in African savannas has continually exposed the complexity of the situation, as large tree survival is influenced at various demographic stages. In some cases, a coalescence of historical factors may have resulted in what could be perceived as an aesthetically appealing savanna for managers and tourists alike. Furthermore, the past high density of surface water within the KNP homogenised elephant impact on large trees by increasing the encounter rate between elephants and large trees. Our review evaluates how current mitigation strategies have shifted from purely managing elephant numbers to managing elephant distribution across impact gradients, thereby promoting heterogeneity within the system. Additionally, we discuss each mitigation strategy’s occurrence at various landscape scales and its advantages and disadvantages when used to manage impact of elephant on large trees.Conservation implications: A variety of options exist to manage the effects that elephants have on large trees. These options range from large-scale landscape manipulation solutions to small-scale individual tree protection methods. Interactions between elephants and large trees are complex, however, and conservation managers need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each mitigation strategy to protect large trees.","PeriodicalId":48892,"journal":{"name":"Koedoe","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The management dilemma: Removing elephants to save large trees\",\"authors\":\"M. Henley, R. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/KOEDOE.V61I1.1564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The loss of large trees ( 5 m in height) in Africa’s protected areas is often attributed to the impact by savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana). Concerns have been raised over large tree mortality levels in protected areas such as South Africa’s Kruger National Park (KNP) and in the past, the need to manage its elephant population in order to preserve large trees and biodiversity as a whole. Our review aims to synthesise and discuss the complexities of managing elephants’ effects on the landscape to ensure the survival of large trees, as well as the application purposes of the various lethal and non-lethal elephant mitigation strategies. We further critically evaluate past management strategies, which have solely focused on controlling elephant numbers to protect large trees. Past mitigation strategies focused on managing elephant impact by directly reducing elephant numbers. However, maintaining elephant numbers at a pre-determined carrying capacity level did not prevent the loss of large trees. Research on large tree survival in African savannas has continually exposed the complexity of the situation, as large tree survival is influenced at various demographic stages. In some cases, a coalescence of historical factors may have resulted in what could be perceived as an aesthetically appealing savanna for managers and tourists alike. Furthermore, the past high density of surface water within the KNP homogenised elephant impact on large trees by increasing the encounter rate between elephants and large trees. Our review evaluates how current mitigation strategies have shifted from purely managing elephant numbers to managing elephant distribution across impact gradients, thereby promoting heterogeneity within the system. Additionally, we discuss each mitigation strategy’s occurrence at various landscape scales and its advantages and disadvantages when used to manage impact of elephant on large trees.Conservation implications: A variety of options exist to manage the effects that elephants have on large trees. These options range from large-scale landscape manipulation solutions to small-scale individual tree protection methods. Interactions between elephants and large trees are complex, however, and conservation managers need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each mitigation strategy to protect large trees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koedoe\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koedoe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/KOEDOE.V61I1.1564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koedoe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/KOEDOE.V61I1.1564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

非洲保护区内大树(5米高)的消失通常归因于热带草原象(Loxodonta africana)的影响。在南非的克鲁格国家公园(KNP)等保护区,人们对大树的死亡率感到担忧,过去,为了保护大树和整体生物多样性,需要管理大象数量。我们的综述旨在综合和讨论管理大象对景观影响的复杂性,以确保大树的生存,以及各种致命和非致命大象缓解策略的应用目的。我们进一步批判性地评估了过去的管理策略,这些策略仅仅关注于控制大象数量以保护大树。过去的缓解战略侧重于通过直接减少大象数量来管理对大象的影响。然而,将大象数量维持在预定的承载能力水平并不能防止大树的损失。非洲热带稀树草原大树的生存研究不断暴露出情况的复杂性,因为大树的生存在不同的人口统计学阶段受到影响。在某些情况下,历史因素的共同作用可能导致了对管理人员和游客来说具有美学吸引力的稀树大草原。此外,KNP内过去高密度的地表水通过增加大象与大树之间的相遇率来均匀化大象对大树的影响。我们的综述评估了当前的缓解策略是如何从纯粹管理大象数量转变为管理大象在影响梯度上的分布,从而促进系统内的异质性。此外,我们还讨论了每种缓解策略在不同景观尺度上的出现情况,以及用于管理大象对大树的影响时的优缺点。保护意义:有多种选择可以管理大象对大树的影响。这些选择包括从大规模景观处理解决方案到小规模单个树木保护方法。然而,大象和大树之间的相互作用是复杂的,保护管理者需要考虑每种缓解策略的利弊,以保护大树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The management dilemma: Removing elephants to save large trees
The loss of large trees ( 5 m in height) in Africa’s protected areas is often attributed to the impact by savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana). Concerns have been raised over large tree mortality levels in protected areas such as South Africa’s Kruger National Park (KNP) and in the past, the need to manage its elephant population in order to preserve large trees and biodiversity as a whole. Our review aims to synthesise and discuss the complexities of managing elephants’ effects on the landscape to ensure the survival of large trees, as well as the application purposes of the various lethal and non-lethal elephant mitigation strategies. We further critically evaluate past management strategies, which have solely focused on controlling elephant numbers to protect large trees. Past mitigation strategies focused on managing elephant impact by directly reducing elephant numbers. However, maintaining elephant numbers at a pre-determined carrying capacity level did not prevent the loss of large trees. Research on large tree survival in African savannas has continually exposed the complexity of the situation, as large tree survival is influenced at various demographic stages. In some cases, a coalescence of historical factors may have resulted in what could be perceived as an aesthetically appealing savanna for managers and tourists alike. Furthermore, the past high density of surface water within the KNP homogenised elephant impact on large trees by increasing the encounter rate between elephants and large trees. Our review evaluates how current mitigation strategies have shifted from purely managing elephant numbers to managing elephant distribution across impact gradients, thereby promoting heterogeneity within the system. Additionally, we discuss each mitigation strategy’s occurrence at various landscape scales and its advantages and disadvantages when used to manage impact of elephant on large trees.Conservation implications: A variety of options exist to manage the effects that elephants have on large trees. These options range from large-scale landscape manipulation solutions to small-scale individual tree protection methods. Interactions between elephants and large trees are complex, however, and conservation managers need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each mitigation strategy to protect large trees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Koedoe
Koedoe BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Koedoe, with the subtitle ''African Protected Area Conservation and Science'', promotes and contributes to the scientific (biological) and environmental (ecological and biodiversity) conservation practices of Africa by defining the key disciplines that will ensure the existence of a wide variety of plant and animal species in their natural environments (biological diversity) in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of a wildlife and cattle savanna ranch in South-Western Zimbabwe Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 1 of 3): Herbivores and omnivores Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 2 of 3): Shorebirds Waterbird community changes in the Wilderness Lakes, South Africa (Part 3 of 3): Diving piscivores and scavengers Erratum: The influence of fire presence and absence on grass species composition and species richness at Mountain Zebra National Park
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1