裸眼砾石充填与机械裸眼隔离封隔器:经济有效的解决多层含砂气井水侵延迟的替代方案

Asba Madzidah Binti Abu Bakar, M. M. H. B. Amjath Hussain, M. F. B. Bakar, Fuziana Binti Tusimin, A. Abdullah, Chee Seong Tan, Nicholas Moses
{"title":"裸眼砾石充填与机械裸眼隔离封隔器:经济有效的解决多层含砂气井水侵延迟的替代方案","authors":"Asba Madzidah Binti Abu Bakar, M. M. H. B. Amjath Hussain, M. F. B. Bakar, Fuziana Binti Tusimin, A. Abdullah, Chee Seong Tan, Nicholas Moses","doi":"10.4043/31470-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Originally, an infill well from project H was approved in 2013 to be completed as a single zone Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) to produce gas commingled from three sands located at the shallowest reservoir in that field. Interpretation of recent logs from a nearby producing well indicated that there was significant water threat at two of the sands which would lead to water influx from the beginning of production if the well was to be completed as a single zone OHGP.\n The well was then redesigned to be completed as a Cased Hole Gravel Pack (CHGP) in order to have mechanical isolation from the water zones with an inner string and internal isolation packers to allow feasibility of zonal isolation to shut off the water producing zone in the future. This feature however resulted in higher well cost as compared to the approved design.\n Due to recent hostile low oil price, a more cost-effective sand control design was evaluated to reduce the well cost while maintaining similar performances as a CHGP design in terms of the capability to delay water breakthrough. Design feasibility study was performed on multizone OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and an inner string design to evaluate its performance and magnitude of cost reduction relative to a CHGP design.\n Skin analysis was performed for both OHGP and CHGP completion designs to evaluate any additional pressure loss for each sand. Prior to compartment optimization, an OHGP completion without packer placement was simulated in a dynamic simulation to generate the production profile as a base case. This was followed by a compartment optimization that was performed with OH mechanical packer placement at various standoff distances from the Gas-Water Contact (GWC) such as 5ft, 10ft, 15ft, 20ft and 30ft respectively.\n Subsequently, similar analysis was then performed on the CHGP completion design with a higher skin value estimated for the CHGP completion to reflect a higher degree of damage resulting from the cementing and perforation operations. Several production sensitivities were simulated by varying the perforation length and standoff from the GWC to replicate the same scenario of the open hole mechanical packer placement in the OHGP design analysis. Finally, analysis on the effectiveness of the base case (OHGP with no packer) against the cases of OHGP with optimum packer placement and CHGP with optimum perforation depth were compared and ranked over cumulative gas production, cumulative water production, operational complexity, and risk as well as total well cost.\n Based on the dynamic modelling, the base case (OHGP without packer) showed water breakthrough occurring right at the start of production as expected. Once breakthrough occured, water production would rapidly dominate production. On the other hand, packer placement sensitivity analysis for the OHGP design showed that the optimum depth for packer placement was 20ft or 30ft above the GWC depth where it provided highest gas cumulative and lowest water cumulative production throughout the well life. With offset distance of at least 20ft away from the GWC, the cumulative gas production for the OHGP and the CHGP cases were found to be similar and the cumulative water production for the OHGP case was slightly lower than the CHGP case.\n Mechanical open hole packer was recommended instead of swell packer after considering the risk of inadequate isolation by swellable packer that would lead to early water breakthrough which would subsequently reduce the cumulative gas production. As a result, an OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and inner string was selected to be the most optimum design for this well with estimated cost reduction of nearly 13% from a CHGP design. In general, an OHGP with OH mechanical packer at 20ft or 30ft standoff from the GWC brought benefit to the infill well in terms of cumulative gas production gain and low water production while eliminating sand production.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Hole Gravel Pack with Mechanical Open Hole Isolation Packer: Cost Effective Alternative Solution for Water Influx Deferments in Sand Prone Multizone Gas Well\",\"authors\":\"Asba Madzidah Binti Abu Bakar, M. M. H. B. Amjath Hussain, M. F. B. Bakar, Fuziana Binti Tusimin, A. Abdullah, Chee Seong Tan, Nicholas Moses\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/31470-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Originally, an infill well from project H was approved in 2013 to be completed as a single zone Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) to produce gas commingled from three sands located at the shallowest reservoir in that field. Interpretation of recent logs from a nearby producing well indicated that there was significant water threat at two of the sands which would lead to water influx from the beginning of production if the well was to be completed as a single zone OHGP.\\n The well was then redesigned to be completed as a Cased Hole Gravel Pack (CHGP) in order to have mechanical isolation from the water zones with an inner string and internal isolation packers to allow feasibility of zonal isolation to shut off the water producing zone in the future. This feature however resulted in higher well cost as compared to the approved design.\\n Due to recent hostile low oil price, a more cost-effective sand control design was evaluated to reduce the well cost while maintaining similar performances as a CHGP design in terms of the capability to delay water breakthrough. Design feasibility study was performed on multizone OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and an inner string design to evaluate its performance and magnitude of cost reduction relative to a CHGP design.\\n Skin analysis was performed for both OHGP and CHGP completion designs to evaluate any additional pressure loss for each sand. Prior to compartment optimization, an OHGP completion without packer placement was simulated in a dynamic simulation to generate the production profile as a base case. This was followed by a compartment optimization that was performed with OH mechanical packer placement at various standoff distances from the Gas-Water Contact (GWC) such as 5ft, 10ft, 15ft, 20ft and 30ft respectively.\\n Subsequently, similar analysis was then performed on the CHGP completion design with a higher skin value estimated for the CHGP completion to reflect a higher degree of damage resulting from the cementing and perforation operations. Several production sensitivities were simulated by varying the perforation length and standoff from the GWC to replicate the same scenario of the open hole mechanical packer placement in the OHGP design analysis. Finally, analysis on the effectiveness of the base case (OHGP with no packer) against the cases of OHGP with optimum packer placement and CHGP with optimum perforation depth were compared and ranked over cumulative gas production, cumulative water production, operational complexity, and risk as well as total well cost.\\n Based on the dynamic modelling, the base case (OHGP without packer) showed water breakthrough occurring right at the start of production as expected. Once breakthrough occured, water production would rapidly dominate production. On the other hand, packer placement sensitivity analysis for the OHGP design showed that the optimum depth for packer placement was 20ft or 30ft above the GWC depth where it provided highest gas cumulative and lowest water cumulative production throughout the well life. With offset distance of at least 20ft away from the GWC, the cumulative gas production for the OHGP and the CHGP cases were found to be similar and the cumulative water production for the OHGP case was slightly lower than the CHGP case.\\n Mechanical open hole packer was recommended instead of swell packer after considering the risk of inadequate isolation by swellable packer that would lead to early water breakthrough which would subsequently reduce the cumulative gas production. As a result, an OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and inner string was selected to be the most optimum design for this well with estimated cost reduction of nearly 13% from a CHGP design. In general, an OHGP with OH mechanical packer at 20ft or 30ft standoff from the GWC brought benefit to the infill well in terms of cumulative gas production gain and low water production while eliminating sand production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/31470-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31470-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最初,H项目的一口井在2013年被批准完成,作为单层裸眼砾石充填(OHGP),从该油田最浅的储层中开采三种砂岩的混合天然气。对附近一口生产井最近的测井资料的解释表明,如果将这口井作为单层OHGP完成,那么其中两口砂层存在严重的水威胁,从生产开始就会导致水涌入。随后,该井被重新设计为套管井砾石充填(CHGP)完井,通过内管柱和内部隔离封隔器与含水层进行机械隔离,从而实现分层隔离的可行性,从而在未来关闭产水层。然而,与认可的设计相比,这一特点导致了更高的钻井成本。由于最近的低油价,研究人员评估了一种更具成本效益的防砂设计,以降低钻井成本,同时保持与CHGP设计相似的延迟水侵能力。对采用裸眼机械封隔器和内管柱设计的多层OHGP进行了设计可行性研究,以评估其性能和相对于CHGP设计的成本降低幅度。对OHGP和CHGP完井设计都进行了表皮分析,以评估每种砂的额外压力损失。在进行隔室优化之前,在动态模拟中模拟了一次没有放置封隔器的OHGP完井,以生成生产剖面作为基本情况。随后进行了隔室优化,将OH机械封隔器放置在距离气水界面(GWC)不同的距离处,分别为5英尺、10英尺、15英尺、20英尺和30英尺。随后,对CHGP完井设计进行了类似的分析,估计CHGP完井的表皮值更高,以反映固井和射孔作业造成的更高程度的损害。通过改变GWC的射孔长度和距离来模拟几种生产敏感性,以复制OHGP设计分析中裸眼机械封隔器放置的相同场景。最后,对基本情况(无封隔器的OHGP)、最佳封隔器位置的OHGP和最佳射孔深度的CHGP的有效性进行了比较,并对累积产气量、累积产水量、操作复杂性、风险以及井总成本进行了排名。基于动态建模,基本情况(不带封隔器的OHGP)显示,在生产开始时就出现了水侵。一旦突破,水产量将迅速占主导地位。另一方面,对OHGP设计进行的封隔器放置敏感性分析表明,封隔器的最佳放置深度是在GWC深度以上20英尺或30英尺,在整个井寿命期间,该位置的累积产气量最高,累积产水量最低。在距GWC至少20英尺的偏移距离下,OHGP和CHGP的累积产气量相似,而OHGP的累积产水量略低于CHGP。考虑到可膨胀封隔器隔离不充分的风险,可能会导致早期水侵,进而降低累积产气量,因此推荐使用机械裸眼封隔器而不是膨胀封隔器。因此,采用带有裸眼机械封隔器和内管柱的OHGP是该井的最佳设计,与CHGP相比,成本降低了近13%。一般来说,在距离GWC 20英尺或30英尺处安装OH机械封隔器的OHGP,在累积产气量增加和低产水量方面对填充井有利,同时消除了出砂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Hole Gravel Pack with Mechanical Open Hole Isolation Packer: Cost Effective Alternative Solution for Water Influx Deferments in Sand Prone Multizone Gas Well
Originally, an infill well from project H was approved in 2013 to be completed as a single zone Open Hole Gravel Pack (OHGP) to produce gas commingled from three sands located at the shallowest reservoir in that field. Interpretation of recent logs from a nearby producing well indicated that there was significant water threat at two of the sands which would lead to water influx from the beginning of production if the well was to be completed as a single zone OHGP. The well was then redesigned to be completed as a Cased Hole Gravel Pack (CHGP) in order to have mechanical isolation from the water zones with an inner string and internal isolation packers to allow feasibility of zonal isolation to shut off the water producing zone in the future. This feature however resulted in higher well cost as compared to the approved design. Due to recent hostile low oil price, a more cost-effective sand control design was evaluated to reduce the well cost while maintaining similar performances as a CHGP design in terms of the capability to delay water breakthrough. Design feasibility study was performed on multizone OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and an inner string design to evaluate its performance and magnitude of cost reduction relative to a CHGP design. Skin analysis was performed for both OHGP and CHGP completion designs to evaluate any additional pressure loss for each sand. Prior to compartment optimization, an OHGP completion without packer placement was simulated in a dynamic simulation to generate the production profile as a base case. This was followed by a compartment optimization that was performed with OH mechanical packer placement at various standoff distances from the Gas-Water Contact (GWC) such as 5ft, 10ft, 15ft, 20ft and 30ft respectively. Subsequently, similar analysis was then performed on the CHGP completion design with a higher skin value estimated for the CHGP completion to reflect a higher degree of damage resulting from the cementing and perforation operations. Several production sensitivities were simulated by varying the perforation length and standoff from the GWC to replicate the same scenario of the open hole mechanical packer placement in the OHGP design analysis. Finally, analysis on the effectiveness of the base case (OHGP with no packer) against the cases of OHGP with optimum packer placement and CHGP with optimum perforation depth were compared and ranked over cumulative gas production, cumulative water production, operational complexity, and risk as well as total well cost. Based on the dynamic modelling, the base case (OHGP without packer) showed water breakthrough occurring right at the start of production as expected. Once breakthrough occured, water production would rapidly dominate production. On the other hand, packer placement sensitivity analysis for the OHGP design showed that the optimum depth for packer placement was 20ft or 30ft above the GWC depth where it provided highest gas cumulative and lowest water cumulative production throughout the well life. With offset distance of at least 20ft away from the GWC, the cumulative gas production for the OHGP and the CHGP cases were found to be similar and the cumulative water production for the OHGP case was slightly lower than the CHGP case. Mechanical open hole packer was recommended instead of swell packer after considering the risk of inadequate isolation by swellable packer that would lead to early water breakthrough which would subsequently reduce the cumulative gas production. As a result, an OHGP with open hole mechanical packer and inner string was selected to be the most optimum design for this well with estimated cost reduction of nearly 13% from a CHGP design. In general, an OHGP with OH mechanical packer at 20ft or 30ft standoff from the GWC brought benefit to the infill well in terms of cumulative gas production gain and low water production while eliminating sand production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1