BRFP:一种支持融合语法和图嵌入表示算法的高效通用的句子嵌入学习模型方法

J. Sensors Pub Date : 2022-08-17 DOI:10.1155/2022/7471408
Zhifeng Li, Wen-Wang Wu, Chunlei Shen
{"title":"BRFP:一种支持融合语法和图嵌入表示算法的高效通用的句子嵌入学习模型方法","authors":"Zhifeng Li, Wen-Wang Wu, Chunlei Shen","doi":"10.1155/2022/7471408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the rapidly growing volume of data on the Internet, the methods of efficiently and accurately processing massive text information have been the focus of research. In natural language processing theory, sentence embedding representation is an important method. This paper proposes a new sentence embedding learning model called BRFP (Factorization Process with Bidirectional Restraints) that fuses syntactic information, uses matrix decomposition to learn syntactic information, and fuses and calculates with word vectors to obtain the embedded representation of sentences. In the experimental chapter, text similarity experiments are conducted to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the model and analyzed experimental results on Chinese and English texts with the current mainstream learning methods, and potential improvement directions are summarized. The experimental results on Chinese and English datasets, including STS, AFQMC, and LCQMC, show that the model proposed in this paper outperforms the CNN method in terms of accuracy and F1 value by 7.6% and 4.8. The comparison experiment with the word vector weighted model shows that when the sentence length is longer, or the corresponding syntactic structure is complex, the model’s advantages in this paper are more prominent than TF-IDF and SIF methods. Compared with the TF-IDF method, the effect improved by 14.4%. Compared with the SIF method, it has a maximum advantage of 7.9%, and the overall improvement in each comparative experimental task is between 4 and 6 percentage points. In the neural network model comparison experiment, the model in this paper compared the CNN, RNN, LSTM, ST, QT, and InferSent models, and the effect significantly improved on the 14’OnWN, 14’Tweet-news, and 15’Ans.-forum datasets. For example, in the 14’OnWN dataset, the BRFP method has a 10.9% improvement over the ST method. The 14’Tweet-news dataset has a 22.9% advantage over the LSTM method, and the 15’Ans.-forum dataset has a 24.07% improvement over the RNN method. The article also demonstrates the generality of the model, proving that the model proposed in this paper is also a universal learning framework.","PeriodicalId":14776,"journal":{"name":"J. Sensors","volume":"03 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BRFP: An Efficient and Universal Sentence Embedding Learning Model Method Supporting Fused Syntax Combined with Graph Embedding Representation Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Zhifeng Li, Wen-Wang Wu, Chunlei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/7471408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the rapidly growing volume of data on the Internet, the methods of efficiently and accurately processing massive text information have been the focus of research. In natural language processing theory, sentence embedding representation is an important method. This paper proposes a new sentence embedding learning model called BRFP (Factorization Process with Bidirectional Restraints) that fuses syntactic information, uses matrix decomposition to learn syntactic information, and fuses and calculates with word vectors to obtain the embedded representation of sentences. In the experimental chapter, text similarity experiments are conducted to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the model and analyzed experimental results on Chinese and English texts with the current mainstream learning methods, and potential improvement directions are summarized. The experimental results on Chinese and English datasets, including STS, AFQMC, and LCQMC, show that the model proposed in this paper outperforms the CNN method in terms of accuracy and F1 value by 7.6% and 4.8. The comparison experiment with the word vector weighted model shows that when the sentence length is longer, or the corresponding syntactic structure is complex, the model’s advantages in this paper are more prominent than TF-IDF and SIF methods. Compared with the TF-IDF method, the effect improved by 14.4%. Compared with the SIF method, it has a maximum advantage of 7.9%, and the overall improvement in each comparative experimental task is between 4 and 6 percentage points. In the neural network model comparison experiment, the model in this paper compared the CNN, RNN, LSTM, ST, QT, and InferSent models, and the effect significantly improved on the 14’OnWN, 14’Tweet-news, and 15’Ans.-forum datasets. For example, in the 14’OnWN dataset, the BRFP method has a 10.9% improvement over the ST method. The 14’Tweet-news dataset has a 22.9% advantage over the LSTM method, and the 15’Ans.-forum dataset has a 24.07% improvement over the RNN method. The article also demonstrates the generality of the model, proving that the model proposed in this paper is also a universal learning framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Sensors\",\"volume\":\"03 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7471408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7471408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着互联网数据量的快速增长,如何高效、准确地处理海量文本信息一直是研究的热点。在自然语言处理理论中,句子嵌入表示是一种重要的方法。本文提出了一种新的句子嵌入学习模型BRFP (Factorization Process with Bidirectional constraints),该模型融合句法信息,利用矩阵分解学习句法信息,再结合词向量进行融合计算,得到句子的嵌入表示。实验章节通过文本相似度实验验证了模型的合理性和有效性,并对当前主流学习方法下的中英文文本实验结果进行了分析,总结了可能的改进方向。在STS、AFQMC和题中英文数据集上的实验结果表明,本文提出的模型在准确率和F1值上分别优于CNN方法7.6%和4.8。与词向量加权模型的对比实验表明,当句子长度较长或对应的句法结构较复杂时,本文模型的优势比TF-IDF和SIF方法更为突出。与TF-IDF法相比,效果提高14.4%。与SIF方法相比,其最大优势为7.9%,各对比实验任务的整体提升幅度在4 - 6个百分点之间。在神经网络模型对比实验中,本文模型对比了CNN、RNN、LSTM、ST、QT和InferSent模型,在14'OnWN、14'Tweet-news和15'Ans上的效果显著提高。论坛数据集。例如,在14'OnWN数据集中,BRFP方法比ST方法有10.9%的改进。14'Tweet-news数据集比LSTM方法和15'Ans方法具有22.9%的优势。-forum数据集比RNN方法提高了24.07%。文章还论证了模型的通用性,证明本文提出的模型也是一个通用的学习框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRFP: An Efficient and Universal Sentence Embedding Learning Model Method Supporting Fused Syntax Combined with Graph Embedding Representation Algorithm
Due to the rapidly growing volume of data on the Internet, the methods of efficiently and accurately processing massive text information have been the focus of research. In natural language processing theory, sentence embedding representation is an important method. This paper proposes a new sentence embedding learning model called BRFP (Factorization Process with Bidirectional Restraints) that fuses syntactic information, uses matrix decomposition to learn syntactic information, and fuses and calculates with word vectors to obtain the embedded representation of sentences. In the experimental chapter, text similarity experiments are conducted to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the model and analyzed experimental results on Chinese and English texts with the current mainstream learning methods, and potential improvement directions are summarized. The experimental results on Chinese and English datasets, including STS, AFQMC, and LCQMC, show that the model proposed in this paper outperforms the CNN method in terms of accuracy and F1 value by 7.6% and 4.8. The comparison experiment with the word vector weighted model shows that when the sentence length is longer, or the corresponding syntactic structure is complex, the model’s advantages in this paper are more prominent than TF-IDF and SIF methods. Compared with the TF-IDF method, the effect improved by 14.4%. Compared with the SIF method, it has a maximum advantage of 7.9%, and the overall improvement in each comparative experimental task is between 4 and 6 percentage points. In the neural network model comparison experiment, the model in this paper compared the CNN, RNN, LSTM, ST, QT, and InferSent models, and the effect significantly improved on the 14’OnWN, 14’Tweet-news, and 15’Ans.-forum datasets. For example, in the 14’OnWN dataset, the BRFP method has a 10.9% improvement over the ST method. The 14’Tweet-news dataset has a 22.9% advantage over the LSTM method, and the 15’Ans.-forum dataset has a 24.07% improvement over the RNN method. The article also demonstrates the generality of the model, proving that the model proposed in this paper is also a universal learning framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index Construction and Application of School-Enterprise Collaborative Education Platform Based on AHP Fuzzy Method in Double Creation Education Practice Optimization of Intelligent Display Mode of Museum Cultural Relics Based on Intelligent Wireless Sensor Network Feature Extraction Method of Art Visual Communication Image Based on 5G Intelligent Sensor Network Scene Classification Using Deep Networks Combined with Visual Attention Spatial Expression of Multifaceted Soft Decoration Elements: Application of 3D Reconstruction Algorithm in Soft Decoration and Furnishing Design of Office Space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1