干旱景观中的文化服务。基于人们感知的比较研究,伊朗东南部

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Arid Land Research and Management Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1080/15324982.2023.2213671
A. Khosravi Mashizi, Mohsen Sharafatmandrad
{"title":"干旱景观中的文化服务。基于人们感知的比较研究,伊朗东南部","authors":"A. Khosravi Mashizi, Mohsen Sharafatmandrad","doi":"10.1080/15324982.2023.2213671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are powerful motivators for stakeholders and managers to preserve valuable landscapes. There is little information about CESs and their spatial distribution in arid lands. It is necessary to identify the most important social-ecological drivers of CESs supply to improve coldspot areas in this regard. Seven cultural ecosystem services were quantified based on people’s perception across eight different arid landscapes, in southeast of Iran. A questionnaire was prepared based on landscape photography to interview people using non-proportional quota sampling. Using hotspot analysis, the spatial distribution of cultural services was then examined. CESs’ hotspots were often dispersed in the semi-arid regions (95% of hotspots), whereas coldspots were often dispersed in arid regions (73% of coldspots). The landscape condition, landscape type, and plant traits were the most important ecological drivers of CESs supply (p < 0.05), showing priority regions for conservation or restoration. Woodlands were more successful in providing CESs than rangelands. The two woodland landscapes, i.e., scale-leaved evergreen coniferous and deciduous broad-leaved trees had the most potential for providing CESs. The lowland mixed halophyte shrubs-annual species landscape had the least potential for CESs supply. The education and income (p < 0.05) were the main social drivers of CESs provision, which are effective for restoration of areas with the risk of CESs loss. Our findings provide useful information for planners and managers to understand the potential of different landscapes in providing multiple CESs and to relate them to conservation/restoration plans.","PeriodicalId":8380,"journal":{"name":"Arid Land Research and Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"619 - 636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural services in arid landscapes. A comparative study based on people’s perception, southeast of Iran\",\"authors\":\"A. Khosravi Mashizi, Mohsen Sharafatmandrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15324982.2023.2213671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are powerful motivators for stakeholders and managers to preserve valuable landscapes. There is little information about CESs and their spatial distribution in arid lands. It is necessary to identify the most important social-ecological drivers of CESs supply to improve coldspot areas in this regard. Seven cultural ecosystem services were quantified based on people’s perception across eight different arid landscapes, in southeast of Iran. A questionnaire was prepared based on landscape photography to interview people using non-proportional quota sampling. Using hotspot analysis, the spatial distribution of cultural services was then examined. CESs’ hotspots were often dispersed in the semi-arid regions (95% of hotspots), whereas coldspots were often dispersed in arid regions (73% of coldspots). The landscape condition, landscape type, and plant traits were the most important ecological drivers of CESs supply (p < 0.05), showing priority regions for conservation or restoration. Woodlands were more successful in providing CESs than rangelands. The two woodland landscapes, i.e., scale-leaved evergreen coniferous and deciduous broad-leaved trees had the most potential for providing CESs. The lowland mixed halophyte shrubs-annual species landscape had the least potential for CESs supply. The education and income (p < 0.05) were the main social drivers of CESs provision, which are effective for restoration of areas with the risk of CESs loss. Our findings provide useful information for planners and managers to understand the potential of different landscapes in providing multiple CESs and to relate them to conservation/restoration plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arid Land Research and Management\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"619 - 636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arid Land Research and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2023.2213671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arid Land Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2023.2213671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化生态系统服务(CESs)是利益相关者和管理者保护有价值景观的强大动力。关于干旱区CESs及其空间分布的资料很少。有必要确定最重要的社会生态驱动因素,以改善这方面的冷点地区。根据人们对伊朗东南部8种不同干旱景观的感知,对7种文化生态系统服务进行了量化。以风景摄影为基础,编制问卷,采用非比例定额抽样的方式进行访谈。利用热点分析方法,考察了文化服务的空间分布。CESs热点多分布在半干旱区(95%的热点),冷点多分布在干旱区(73%的冷点)。景观条件、景观类型和植物性状是影响CESs供给的最重要生态驱动因素(p < 0.05),具有优先保护或恢复区域。林地比牧场更成功地提供了清洁能源。两种林地景观,即鳞片常绿针叶林和落叶阔叶林,最有可能提供CESs。低地盐生混合灌丛-一年生种景观的CESs供应潜力最小。教育和经济收入是促进经济发展的主要社会驱动因素(p < 0.05),这两种社会驱动因素对经济发展风险地区的恢复是有效的。我们的研究结果为规划者和管理者提供了有用的信息,以了解不同景观在提供多种生态环境方面的潜力,并将其与保护/修复计划联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultural services in arid landscapes. A comparative study based on people’s perception, southeast of Iran
Abstract Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are powerful motivators for stakeholders and managers to preserve valuable landscapes. There is little information about CESs and their spatial distribution in arid lands. It is necessary to identify the most important social-ecological drivers of CESs supply to improve coldspot areas in this regard. Seven cultural ecosystem services were quantified based on people’s perception across eight different arid landscapes, in southeast of Iran. A questionnaire was prepared based on landscape photography to interview people using non-proportional quota sampling. Using hotspot analysis, the spatial distribution of cultural services was then examined. CESs’ hotspots were often dispersed in the semi-arid regions (95% of hotspots), whereas coldspots were often dispersed in arid regions (73% of coldspots). The landscape condition, landscape type, and plant traits were the most important ecological drivers of CESs supply (p < 0.05), showing priority regions for conservation or restoration. Woodlands were more successful in providing CESs than rangelands. The two woodland landscapes, i.e., scale-leaved evergreen coniferous and deciduous broad-leaved trees had the most potential for providing CESs. The lowland mixed halophyte shrubs-annual species landscape had the least potential for CESs supply. The education and income (p < 0.05) were the main social drivers of CESs provision, which are effective for restoration of areas with the risk of CESs loss. Our findings provide useful information for planners and managers to understand the potential of different landscapes in providing multiple CESs and to relate them to conservation/restoration plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arid Land Research and Management
Arid Land Research and Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Arid Land Research and Management, a cooperating journal of the International Union of Soil Sciences , is a common outlet and a valuable source of information for fundamental and applied research on soils affected by aridity. This journal covers land ecology, including flora and fauna, as well as soil chemistry, biology, physics, and other edaphic aspects. The journal emphasizes recovery of degraded lands and practical, appropriate uses of soils. Reports of biotechnological applications to land use and recovery are included. Full papers and short notes, as well as review articles and book and meeting reviews are published.
期刊最新文献
Effect of hydrogen peroxide application on physiology, production, and post-harvest quality of mini watermelon under salt stress Trends analysis of Evapotranspiration and responses to soil moisture and wind speed over the Taklimakan Desert, China Prediction of current and future gully erosion susceptibility in the Oued Zat watershed in the High Atlas region of Morocco using an SVM-based machine learning approach Effect of different timing of water deficit combined with foliar application of ascorbic acid on physiological variables of sour passion fruit Distribution characteristics of selenium and influencing factors in the plant–soil system of an arid oasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1