A. Kazantsev, K. Chernykh, N. Zarkua, R. Lider, E. Burkova, G. Bagdavadze, E. Y. Kalinin, T. E. Zaitseva, A. E. Chikin, Y. Linets, K. Kubachev
{"title":"缺血性脑卒中不同时期颈动脉内膜切除术的近期和远期效果","authors":"A. Kazantsev, K. Chernykh, N. Zarkua, R. Lider, E. Burkova, G. Bagdavadze, E. Y. Kalinin, T. E. Zaitseva, A. E. Chikin, Y. Linets, K. Kubachev","doi":"10.23888/pavlovj2020283312-322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Analysis of hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different periods of acute cerebrovascular event (ACVE). Materials and Methods . The given study was retrospective and was conducted using the method of patients sampling. In the period from 2010 to 2019, 1113 patients with ACVE in history who were later conducted CEA, were selected. Depending on the time interval between the last ACVE and CAE, all the patients were divided into 4 groups: the 1 st group – in the acutest period of ACVE (1-3 days) (n=24; 2.2%); the 2 nd group – in the acute period of ACVE (up to 28 days) (n=493; 44.3%); the 3 rd group – in the early rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 6 months) (n=481; 43.2%); the 4 th group – in the late rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 2 years) (n=115; 10.3%). The long-term period was 34.8±12.5 months. Results . In the hospitalization period of observation the following complications were found: lethal outcome ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р=0.16)); myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0%; group 4 – 0.9% (n=1); р=0.35)); ACVE/transient ischemic attack (TIA), ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р 1-2 =0.01; р 1-3 =0.009; р 1-4 =0.01)). By the end of hospitalization period the composite endpoint consisting of lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA made in group 1 – 4.2% (n=1), in group 2 – 1.2% (n=6), in group 3 – 0.4% (n=2), in group 4 – 2.6% (n=3), р=0.08. Complications of the long-term follow-up period were: lethal outcome from all causes ((group 1 – 25% (n=6); group 2 – 5.5% (n=27); group 3 – 7.3% (n=35); group 4 – 14% (n=16); р 1-2 =0.002; р 1-3 =0.008; р 2-4 =0.012)); lethal outcome from cardiovascular causes ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 4.8% (n=23); group 4 – 5.2% (n=6); р=0.79)), myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 12.5% (n=3); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 5.4% (n=26); group 4 – 6.1% (n=7); р=0.15)), ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 16.6% (n=4); group 2 – 6.3% (n=31); group 3 – 6% (n=29); group 4 – 11.3% (n=13); р=0.05)); composite endpoint including lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 54.2% (n=13); group 2 – 15.4% (n=76); group 3 – 18.7% (n=90); group 4 – 31.3% (n=36); р 1-2 =0.0001; р 1-3 =0.0001; р 1-4 =0.005; р 2-4 =0.0006; р 3-4 =0.012)). Conclusion. Application of CEA demonstrated effectiveness and safety in the acute and early rehabilitation period of ACVE.","PeriodicalId":13184,"journal":{"name":"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"264 1","pages":"312-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy in different periods of ischemic stroke\",\"authors\":\"A. Kazantsev, K. Chernykh, N. Zarkua, R. Lider, E. Burkova, G. Bagdavadze, E. Y. Kalinin, T. E. Zaitseva, A. E. Chikin, Y. Linets, K. Kubachev\",\"doi\":\"10.23888/pavlovj2020283312-322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. Analysis of hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different periods of acute cerebrovascular event (ACVE). Materials and Methods . The given study was retrospective and was conducted using the method of patients sampling. In the period from 2010 to 2019, 1113 patients with ACVE in history who were later conducted CEA, were selected. Depending on the time interval between the last ACVE and CAE, all the patients were divided into 4 groups: the 1 st group – in the acutest period of ACVE (1-3 days) (n=24; 2.2%); the 2 nd group – in the acute period of ACVE (up to 28 days) (n=493; 44.3%); the 3 rd group – in the early rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 6 months) (n=481; 43.2%); the 4 th group – in the late rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 2 years) (n=115; 10.3%). The long-term period was 34.8±12.5 months. Results . In the hospitalization period of observation the following complications were found: lethal outcome ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р=0.16)); myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0%; group 4 – 0.9% (n=1); р=0.35)); ACVE/transient ischemic attack (TIA), ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р 1-2 =0.01; р 1-3 =0.009; р 1-4 =0.01)). By the end of hospitalization period the composite endpoint consisting of lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA made in group 1 – 4.2% (n=1), in group 2 – 1.2% (n=6), in group 3 – 0.4% (n=2), in group 4 – 2.6% (n=3), р=0.08. Complications of the long-term follow-up period were: lethal outcome from all causes ((group 1 – 25% (n=6); group 2 – 5.5% (n=27); group 3 – 7.3% (n=35); group 4 – 14% (n=16); р 1-2 =0.002; р 1-3 =0.008; р 2-4 =0.012)); lethal outcome from cardiovascular causes ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 4.8% (n=23); group 4 – 5.2% (n=6); р=0.79)), myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 12.5% (n=3); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 5.4% (n=26); group 4 – 6.1% (n=7); р=0.15)), ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 16.6% (n=4); group 2 – 6.3% (n=31); group 3 – 6% (n=29); group 4 – 11.3% (n=13); р=0.05)); composite endpoint including lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 54.2% (n=13); group 2 – 15.4% (n=76); group 3 – 18.7% (n=90); group 4 – 31.3% (n=36); р 1-2 =0.0001; р 1-3 =0.0001; р 1-4 =0.005; р 2-4 =0.0006; р 3-4 =0.012)). Conclusion. Application of CEA demonstrated effectiveness and safety in the acute and early rehabilitation period of ACVE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"312-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23888/pavlovj2020283312-322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P.Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23888/pavlovj2020283312-322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immediate and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy in different periods of ischemic stroke
Aim. Analysis of hospital and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in different periods of acute cerebrovascular event (ACVE). Materials and Methods . The given study was retrospective and was conducted using the method of patients sampling. In the period from 2010 to 2019, 1113 patients with ACVE in history who were later conducted CEA, were selected. Depending on the time interval between the last ACVE and CAE, all the patients were divided into 4 groups: the 1 st group – in the acutest period of ACVE (1-3 days) (n=24; 2.2%); the 2 nd group – in the acute period of ACVE (up to 28 days) (n=493; 44.3%); the 3 rd group – in the early rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 6 months) (n=481; 43.2%); the 4 th group – in the late rehabilitation period of ACVE (up to 2 years) (n=115; 10.3%). The long-term period was 34.8±12.5 months. Results . In the hospitalization period of observation the following complications were found: lethal outcome ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р=0.16)); myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 0%; group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0%; group 4 – 0.9% (n=1); р=0.35)); ACVE/transient ischemic attack (TIA), ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 0.4% (n=2); group 3 – 0.2% (n=1); group 4 – 0%; р 1-2 =0.01; р 1-3 =0.009; р 1-4 =0.01)). By the end of hospitalization period the composite endpoint consisting of lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA made in group 1 – 4.2% (n=1), in group 2 – 1.2% (n=6), in group 3 – 0.4% (n=2), in group 4 – 2.6% (n=3), р=0.08. Complications of the long-term follow-up period were: lethal outcome from all causes ((group 1 – 25% (n=6); group 2 – 5.5% (n=27); group 3 – 7.3% (n=35); group 4 – 14% (n=16); р 1-2 =0.002; р 1-3 =0.008; р 2-4 =0.012)); lethal outcome from cardiovascular causes ((group 1 – 4.2% (n=1); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 4.8% (n=23); group 4 – 5.2% (n=6); р=0.79)), myocardial infarction ((group 1 – 12.5% (n=3); group 2 – 3.6% (n=18); group 3 – 5.4% (n=26); group 4 – 6.1% (n=7); р=0.15)), ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 16.6% (n=4); group 2 – 6.3% (n=31); group 3 – 6% (n=29); group 4 – 11.3% (n=13); р=0.05)); composite endpoint including lethal outcome + myocardial infarction + ACVE/TIA ((group 1 – 54.2% (n=13); group 2 – 15.4% (n=76); group 3 – 18.7% (n=90); group 4 – 31.3% (n=36); р 1-2 =0.0001; р 1-3 =0.0001; р 1-4 =0.005; р 2-4 =0.0006; р 3-4 =0.012)). Conclusion. Application of CEA demonstrated effectiveness and safety in the acute and early rehabilitation period of ACVE.