分析调查过程中犯罪嫌疑人的人权

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research Pub Date : 2022-08-11 DOI:10.15408/jlr.v4i2.27605
SlametHadi Santoso, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, S. Paparang
{"title":"分析调查过程中犯罪嫌疑人的人权","authors":"SlametHadi Santoso, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, S. Paparang","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i2.27605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, the criminal justice system consists of numerous steps, including investigation, investigation, prosecution, and trial. The investigative stage consists of a series of measures taken by investigators in accordance with and according to the manner outlined in this statute in order to discover the suspect and collect evidence that clarifies the nature of the criminal act. In addition, the suspect is a person who, based on preliminary information, should be accused of committing a crime because of his behavior or circumstances. The idea of presumption of innocence stipulates that all parties engaged in a criminal case must be presumed innocent until a court determines guilt. This principle must be observed by law enforcement throughout the investigation, prosecution, and court examination processes. This right is guaranteed by Article 8, paragraph 1, of Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, which states that any individual who is suspected, arrested, detained, prosecuted, or brought before a court must be presumed innocent until a court decision declares his guilt and acquires permanent legal force. Suspects have rights and are protected by the law, despite the fact that they are suspected of committing a crime. This research is normative legal in nature. This study provides input and opinions that law enforcers, in this case Police Investigators, must implement the Presumption of Innocence Principle and defend human rights, since everyone must be deemed innocent prior to a court ruling declaring his guilt and acquiring permanent legal force. In order to expedite the investigative examination process, suspects should submit truthful and uncomplicated information, so that there are no factors that can lead to violence against suspects or abuses of their human rights.","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Yuridis Hak-Hak Asasi Tersangka Pidana Dalam Proses Penyidikan\",\"authors\":\"SlametHadi Santoso, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, S. Paparang\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jlr.v4i2.27605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Indonesia, the criminal justice system consists of numerous steps, including investigation, investigation, prosecution, and trial. The investigative stage consists of a series of measures taken by investigators in accordance with and according to the manner outlined in this statute in order to discover the suspect and collect evidence that clarifies the nature of the criminal act. In addition, the suspect is a person who, based on preliminary information, should be accused of committing a crime because of his behavior or circumstances. The idea of presumption of innocence stipulates that all parties engaged in a criminal case must be presumed innocent until a court determines guilt. This principle must be observed by law enforcement throughout the investigation, prosecution, and court examination processes. This right is guaranteed by Article 8, paragraph 1, of Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, which states that any individual who is suspected, arrested, detained, prosecuted, or brought before a court must be presumed innocent until a court decision declares his guilt and acquires permanent legal force. Suspects have rights and are protected by the law, despite the fact that they are suspected of committing a crime. This research is normative legal in nature. This study provides input and opinions that law enforcers, in this case Police Investigators, must implement the Presumption of Innocence Principle and defend human rights, since everyone must be deemed innocent prior to a court ruling declaring his guilt and acquiring permanent legal force. In order to expedite the investigative examination process, suspects should submit truthful and uncomplicated information, so that there are no factors that can lead to violence against suspects or abuses of their human rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.27605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.27605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,刑事司法系统包括许多步骤,包括调查、调查、起诉和审判。调查阶段由调查人员按照本规约所概述的方式采取的一系列措施组成,目的是发现嫌疑人和收集证据,澄清犯罪行为的性质。此外,根据初步资料,嫌疑犯是由于其行为或情况而应被指控犯罪的人。无罪推定的概念规定,在法院判定有罪之前,刑事案件的所有当事人都必须被推定为无罪。在整个调查、起诉和法庭审查过程中,执法部门必须遵守这一原则。2009年关于司法权的第48号法律第8条第1款保障了这一权利,其中规定,在法院判决宣布其有罪并具有永久法律效力之前,任何被怀疑、逮捕、拘留、起诉或提交法院审理的个人都必须被推定为无罪。犯罪嫌疑人尽管涉嫌犯罪,但仍有权利受到法律保护。本研究本质上是规范性的法律研究。这项研究提供了执法人员,在这种情况下是警察调查员,必须执行无罪推定原则和捍卫人权的投入和意见,因为在法院宣布其有罪并获得永久法律效力之前,每个人都必须被视为无罪。为了加快调查审查过程,嫌疑人应提交真实和简单的资料,以便不存在可能导致对嫌疑人施暴或侵犯其人权的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analisis Yuridis Hak-Hak Asasi Tersangka Pidana Dalam Proses Penyidikan
In Indonesia, the criminal justice system consists of numerous steps, including investigation, investigation, prosecution, and trial. The investigative stage consists of a series of measures taken by investigators in accordance with and according to the manner outlined in this statute in order to discover the suspect and collect evidence that clarifies the nature of the criminal act. In addition, the suspect is a person who, based on preliminary information, should be accused of committing a crime because of his behavior or circumstances. The idea of presumption of innocence stipulates that all parties engaged in a criminal case must be presumed innocent until a court determines guilt. This principle must be observed by law enforcement throughout the investigation, prosecution, and court examination processes. This right is guaranteed by Article 8, paragraph 1, of Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, which states that any individual who is suspected, arrested, detained, prosecuted, or brought before a court must be presumed innocent until a court decision declares his guilt and acquires permanent legal force. Suspects have rights and are protected by the law, despite the fact that they are suspected of committing a crime. This research is normative legal in nature. This study provides input and opinions that law enforcers, in this case Police Investigators, must implement the Presumption of Innocence Principle and defend human rights, since everyone must be deemed innocent prior to a court ruling declaring his guilt and acquiring permanent legal force. In order to expedite the investigative examination process, suspects should submit truthful and uncomplicated information, so that there are no factors that can lead to violence against suspects or abuses of their human rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Fill in the Blank? A Discussion of Prefilled Tax Returns in the U.S. Does Notice 2014-21 Need an Update? An Analysis of Potential Tax Classifications for Cryptocurrency Covers and Front Matter Editorial Policy Pathology of The Legal Gap in the Tax Collection and Payment Stage (A Comparative Study of The IRS and The United States)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1