“我们”是谁?考察加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省COVID-19公共卫生传播中的关系精神

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION JCOM-Journal of Science Communication Pub Date : 2023-04-16 DOI:10.22323/2.22020204
Philippa Spoel, A. Millar, Naomi Lacelle, Aarani Mathialagan
{"title":"“我们”是谁?考察加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省COVID-19公共卫生传播中的关系精神","authors":"Philippa Spoel, A. Millar, Naomi Lacelle, Aarani Mathialagan","doi":"10.22323/2.22020204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper investigates the multiple meanings and functions of the pronoun “we” in COVID-19 public updates by British Columbia's acclaimed Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry in 2020. Our rhetorical case study shows how “we” contributes to Henry's relational ethos by attempting to foster a communal identity with her implied audience while also distinguishing public health expertise, actions, and authority from citizens' knowledge and actions. Ambiguous uses of “we” blur the line between the knowledge and responsibilities of “we” in public health and “we” as citizens. Overall, our rhetorical analysis demonstrates the significant but ambivalent role this pronoun can play in building relations of social trust among citizens, experts, and institutions within public health and science communication contexts and it suggests the importance of judicious pronoun usage when communicators strive to foster these relations.","PeriodicalId":51818,"journal":{"name":"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who are “we”? Examining relational ethos in British Columbia, Canada's COVID-19 public health communication\",\"authors\":\"Philippa Spoel, A. Millar, Naomi Lacelle, Aarani Mathialagan\",\"doi\":\"10.22323/2.22020204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper investigates the multiple meanings and functions of the pronoun “we” in COVID-19 public updates by British Columbia's acclaimed Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry in 2020. Our rhetorical case study shows how “we” contributes to Henry's relational ethos by attempting to foster a communal identity with her implied audience while also distinguishing public health expertise, actions, and authority from citizens' knowledge and actions. Ambiguous uses of “we” blur the line between the knowledge and responsibilities of “we” in public health and “we” as citizens. Overall, our rhetorical analysis demonstrates the significant but ambivalent role this pronoun can play in building relations of social trust among citizens, experts, and institutions within public health and science communication contexts and it suggests the importance of judicious pronoun usage when communicators strive to foster these relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCOM-Journal of Science Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22020204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了不列颠哥伦比亚省著名的省卫生官员邦尼·亨利博士在2020年新冠肺炎公开更新中代词“我们”的多重含义和功能。我们的修辞案例研究表明,“我们”是如何通过试图与她隐含的受众培养一种公共身份,同时将公共卫生专业知识、行动和权威与公民的知识和行动区分开来,从而为亨利的关系精神做出贡献的。对“我们”的含糊使用模糊了公共卫生领域“我们”的知识和责任与作为公民的“我们”之间的界限。总的来说,我们的修辞分析表明,在公共卫生和科学传播的背景下,这个代词在建立公民、专家和机构之间的社会信任关系方面可以发挥重要但矛盾的作用,它表明,当传播者努力促进这些关系时,明智地使用代词的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who are “we”? Examining relational ethos in British Columbia, Canada's COVID-19 public health communication
This paper investigates the multiple meanings and functions of the pronoun “we” in COVID-19 public updates by British Columbia's acclaimed Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry in 2020. Our rhetorical case study shows how “we” contributes to Henry's relational ethos by attempting to foster a communal identity with her implied audience while also distinguishing public health expertise, actions, and authority from citizens' knowledge and actions. Ambiguous uses of “we” blur the line between the knowledge and responsibilities of “we” in public health and “we” as citizens. Overall, our rhetorical analysis demonstrates the significant but ambivalent role this pronoun can play in building relations of social trust among citizens, experts, and institutions within public health and science communication contexts and it suggests the importance of judicious pronoun usage when communicators strive to foster these relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
80
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Increasing culturally relevant science media coverage: exploring the outcomes of a collaboration in Puerto Rico. An analysis of science communication about COVID-19 vaccination in Portuguese online news media What would aliens think of science on earth? Philosophical dialogues in the museum to help children reflect about science Towards inclusive PE for science granting councils in Sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and opportunities Visualising science: a thorough guide for designing and using science graphics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1