全科医生在改善无家可归住院病人预后方面的作用

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0017
Zana Khan, Philip D. Haine, Samantha Dorney-Smith
{"title":"全科医生在改善无家可归住院病人预后方面的作用","authors":"Zana Khan, Philip D. Haine, Samantha Dorney-Smith","doi":"10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHomeless people experience extreme health inequalities and high rates of morbidity and mortality (Aldridge et al., 2017). Use of primary care services are low, while emergency healthcare use is high (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). Duration of admission has been estimated to be three times longer for homeless patients who often experience poor hospital discharge arrangements (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). This reflects ongoing and unaddressed care and housing needs (Blackburn et al., 2017). The paper aims to discuss these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper reveals how GPs employed in secondary care, as part of Pathway teams, support improved health and housing outcomes and safe transfer of care into community services. It draws on published literature on role of GPs in working with excluded groups, personal experience of working as a GP in secondary care, structured interviews with Pathway GPs and routine data collected by the team to highlight key outcomes.\n\n\nFindings\nThe expertise of GPs is highlighted and includes holistic assessment, management of multimorbidity or “tri-morbidity” – the combination of addictions problems, mental illness and physical health (Homeless Link, 2014; Stringfellow et al., 2015) and research and teaching.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe role of the GP in the care of patients with complex needs is more visible in primary care. This paper demonstrates some of the ways in which in-reach GPs play an important role in the care of multiply excluded groups attending and admitted to secondary care settings.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The GP role in improving outcomes for homeless inpatients\",\"authors\":\"Zana Khan, Philip D. Haine, Samantha Dorney-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nHomeless people experience extreme health inequalities and high rates of morbidity and mortality (Aldridge et al., 2017). Use of primary care services are low, while emergency healthcare use is high (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). Duration of admission has been estimated to be three times longer for homeless patients who often experience poor hospital discharge arrangements (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). This reflects ongoing and unaddressed care and housing needs (Blackburn et al., 2017). The paper aims to discuss these issues.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper reveals how GPs employed in secondary care, as part of Pathway teams, support improved health and housing outcomes and safe transfer of care into community services. It draws on published literature on role of GPs in working with excluded groups, personal experience of working as a GP in secondary care, structured interviews with Pathway GPs and routine data collected by the team to highlight key outcomes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe expertise of GPs is highlighted and includes holistic assessment, management of multimorbidity or “tri-morbidity” – the combination of addictions problems, mental illness and physical health (Homeless Link, 2014; Stringfellow et al., 2015) and research and teaching.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe role of the GP in the care of patients with complex needs is more visible in primary care. This paper demonstrates some of the ways in which in-reach GPs play an important role in the care of multiply excluded groups attending and admitted to secondary care settings.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-07-2018-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

无家可归者经历了极端的健康不平等和高发病率和死亡率(Aldridge et al., 2017)。初级保健服务的使用率很低,而紧急保健的使用率很高(matie, 2012;无家可归者链接,2014)。据估计,无家可归的病人入院时间要长三倍,他们的出院安排往往很差(matie, 2012;无家可归者链接,2014)。这反映了持续的和未解决的护理和住房需求(Blackburn等人,2017)。本文旨在探讨这些问题。设计/方法/方法本文揭示了二级保健中全科医生作为路径团队的一部分如何支持改善健康和住房结果以及将护理安全转移到社区服务。它借鉴了关于全科医生在与被排除群体合作中所起作用的已发表文献、作为二级保健全科医生的个人经验、与Pathway全科医生的结构化访谈以及团队收集的常规数据,以突出关键结果。调查结果:全科医生的专业知识得到强调,包括全面评估、多病或“三病”管理——成瘾问题、精神疾病和身体健康的结合(无家可归者链接,2014;Stringfellow et al., 2015)以及研究和教学。独创性/价值全科医生在照顾有复杂需求的病人方面的作用在初级保健中更为明显。本文展示了一些方法,其中在达到全科医生发挥了重要作用,在护理多重排除群体出席和承认二级护理设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The GP role in improving outcomes for homeless inpatients
Purpose Homeless people experience extreme health inequalities and high rates of morbidity and mortality (Aldridge et al., 2017). Use of primary care services are low, while emergency healthcare use is high (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). Duration of admission has been estimated to be three times longer for homeless patients who often experience poor hospital discharge arrangements (Mathie, 2012; Homeless Link, 2014). This reflects ongoing and unaddressed care and housing needs (Blackburn et al., 2017). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This paper reveals how GPs employed in secondary care, as part of Pathway teams, support improved health and housing outcomes and safe transfer of care into community services. It draws on published literature on role of GPs in working with excluded groups, personal experience of working as a GP in secondary care, structured interviews with Pathway GPs and routine data collected by the team to highlight key outcomes. Findings The expertise of GPs is highlighted and includes holistic assessment, management of multimorbidity or “tri-morbidity” – the combination of addictions problems, mental illness and physical health (Homeless Link, 2014; Stringfellow et al., 2015) and research and teaching. Originality/value The role of the GP in the care of patients with complex needs is more visible in primary care. This paper demonstrates some of the ways in which in-reach GPs play an important role in the care of multiply excluded groups attending and admitted to secondary care settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1