面部操作,情感移情和面部反馈

Andréasson Per, Dimberg Ulf
{"title":"面部操作,情感移情和面部反馈","authors":"Andréasson Per, Dimberg Ulf","doi":"10.23937/2572-4037.1510065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the facial feedback hypothesis (FFH) one’s own facial expressions have a corresponding impact on the subjective experience of emotion. Inspired by Strack, et al. [1] participants in the present study hold a wooden stick between the teeth (forming a smile) or between the lips (forming a sulky face) while rating humorous films. In contrast to the FFH it was found that people scoring low in emotional empathy rated humorous films as less funny in a happy versus a sulky facial manipulation whereas people high in emotional empathy did not differ between the two facial manipulations. However, in Experiment 2 the “Voluntary facial action technique” [2] was applied in which the participants were required to specifically smile or frown to the different films. The results demonstrated that participants low as well as high in emotional empathy reacted as predicted by the facial feedback hypothesis. In conclusion, emotional empathy is suggested to be related to effects of facial feedback in some facial manipulations but not in others.","PeriodicalId":91098,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial Manipulations, Emotional Empathy, and Facial Feedback\",\"authors\":\"Andréasson Per, Dimberg Ulf\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2572-4037.1510065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the facial feedback hypothesis (FFH) one’s own facial expressions have a corresponding impact on the subjective experience of emotion. Inspired by Strack, et al. [1] participants in the present study hold a wooden stick between the teeth (forming a smile) or between the lips (forming a sulky face) while rating humorous films. In contrast to the FFH it was found that people scoring low in emotional empathy rated humorous films as less funny in a happy versus a sulky facial manipulation whereas people high in emotional empathy did not differ between the two facial manipulations. However, in Experiment 2 the “Voluntary facial action technique” [2] was applied in which the participants were required to specifically smile or frown to the different films. The results demonstrated that participants low as well as high in emotional empathy reacted as predicted by the facial feedback hypothesis. In conclusion, emotional empathy is suggested to be related to effects of facial feedback in some facial manipulations but not in others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology and psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4037.1510065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据面部反馈假说(FFH),一个人自己的面部表情对情绪的主观体验有相应的影响。受Strack等人[1]的启发,本研究的参与者在评价幽默电影时将一根木棍夹在牙齿之间(形成微笑)或嘴唇之间(形成愠色)。与FFH实验相反的是,情感同理心得分低的人认为幽默电影中开心的表情比愠怒的表情更不有趣,而情感同理心得分高的人在两种表情处理之间没有区别。然而,在实验2中应用了“自愿面部动作技术”[2],要求参与者对不同的电影特定地微笑或皱眉。结果表明,情绪同理心高和低的参与者的反应与面部反馈假说所预测的一致。综上所述,情绪共情在某些面部操作中与面部反馈的效果有关,而在其他面部操作中则无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facial Manipulations, Emotional Empathy, and Facial Feedback
According to the facial feedback hypothesis (FFH) one’s own facial expressions have a corresponding impact on the subjective experience of emotion. Inspired by Strack, et al. [1] participants in the present study hold a wooden stick between the teeth (forming a smile) or between the lips (forming a sulky face) while rating humorous films. In contrast to the FFH it was found that people scoring low in emotional empathy rated humorous films as less funny in a happy versus a sulky facial manipulation whereas people high in emotional empathy did not differ between the two facial manipulations. However, in Experiment 2 the “Voluntary facial action technique” [2] was applied in which the participants were required to specifically smile or frown to the different films. The results demonstrated that participants low as well as high in emotional empathy reacted as predicted by the facial feedback hypothesis. In conclusion, emotional empathy is suggested to be related to effects of facial feedback in some facial manipulations but not in others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT (Generated Pre-Trained Transformer) As an Adjunct to Mental Health Interventions: A Commentary Sexuality in Endometriosis: Preliminary Data on Pain Malevolence and Illness Intrusiveness Psychological Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation - A Review The Relationship between Personality Traits and Effectiveness of Ethiopian Athletes in Long Distance Running The Predictive Effect of Cognitive Flexibility and Probability Knowledge on Probability Category Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1