熵指数与地理空间技术在印度米佐拉姆邦伦雷地区滑坡预测中的应用

Jonmenjoy Barman , Syed Sadath Ali , Brototi Biswas , Jayanta Das
{"title":"熵指数与地理空间技术在印度米佐拉姆邦伦雷地区滑坡预测中的应用","authors":"Jonmenjoy Barman ,&nbsp;Syed Sadath Ali ,&nbsp;Brototi Biswas ,&nbsp;Jayanta Das","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2023.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study focuses on developing a landslide susceptibility zonation (LSZ) using GIS-based bivariate statistical model in the Lunglei district of Mizoram. Initially, 17 factors were selected after calculating the multicollinearity test for LSZ. A landslide inventory map was created based on 234 historic landslide events, which were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Using the Index of Entropy (IOE) model, nine causative factors were identified as having significant weightage for LSZ: elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, normalized difference vegetation index, geomorphology, distance to road, distance to lineament, and distance to river. On the other hand, factors such as land use land cover, stream power index, terrain ruggedness index, terrain roughness, topographic wetness index, annual rainfall, topographic position index, and geology had negligible weightage. Based on the relative importance of the causative factors, two models were developed: scenario 1, which considered nine factors, and scenario 2, which considered all 17 factors. The results revealed that 16% and 14% of the district area were identified as very highly landslide prone in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. The high susceptibility zone accounted for 26% and 25% of the area in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. To assess the accuracy of the models, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and quality sum ratio method was performed using 30% of the testing landslide data and an equal number of non-landslide data points. The area under the curve (AUC) for scenario 1 and scenario 2 were 0.947 and 0.922, respectively, indicating higher efficiency for scenario 1. The quality sum ratios were 0.435 and 0.43 for scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. Based on these results, the LSZ mapping from scenario 1 is considered suitable for policymakers to address development and risk reduction associated with landslides.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 508-521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000665/pdfft?md5=0c49313c2adff5eb9718d69d54457a6a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666592123000665-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of index of entropy and Geospatial techniques for landslide prediction in Lunglei district, Mizoram, India\",\"authors\":\"Jonmenjoy Barman ,&nbsp;Syed Sadath Ali ,&nbsp;Brototi Biswas ,&nbsp;Jayanta Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nhres.2023.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study focuses on developing a landslide susceptibility zonation (LSZ) using GIS-based bivariate statistical model in the Lunglei district of Mizoram. Initially, 17 factors were selected after calculating the multicollinearity test for LSZ. A landslide inventory map was created based on 234 historic landslide events, which were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Using the Index of Entropy (IOE) model, nine causative factors were identified as having significant weightage for LSZ: elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, normalized difference vegetation index, geomorphology, distance to road, distance to lineament, and distance to river. On the other hand, factors such as land use land cover, stream power index, terrain ruggedness index, terrain roughness, topographic wetness index, annual rainfall, topographic position index, and geology had negligible weightage. Based on the relative importance of the causative factors, two models were developed: scenario 1, which considered nine factors, and scenario 2, which considered all 17 factors. The results revealed that 16% and 14% of the district area were identified as very highly landslide prone in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. The high susceptibility zone accounted for 26% and 25% of the area in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. To assess the accuracy of the models, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and quality sum ratio method was performed using 30% of the testing landslide data and an equal number of non-landslide data points. The area under the curve (AUC) for scenario 1 and scenario 2 were 0.947 and 0.922, respectively, indicating higher efficiency for scenario 1. The quality sum ratios were 0.435 and 0.43 for scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. Based on these results, the LSZ mapping from scenario 1 is considered suitable for policymakers to address development and risk reduction associated with landslides.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Hazards Research\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 508-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000665/pdfft?md5=0c49313c2adff5eb9718d69d54457a6a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666592123000665-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Hazards Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592123000665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的重点是利用基于gis的二元统计模型在米佐拉姆邦隆雷地区建立滑坡易感性区划(LSZ)。初步通过对LSZ进行多重共线性检验,筛选出17个影响因子。基于234个历史滑坡事件,随机分为训练数据集(70%)和测试数据集(30%),创建了滑坡库存图。利用熵指数(IOE)模型,确定了高程、坡度、坡向、曲率、归一化植被指数、地貌、道路距离、地形距离和河流距离等9个因素对LSZ具有显著权重。另一方面,土地利用、土地覆被、河流动力指数、地形崎岖度指数、地形粗糙度、地形湿度指数、年降雨量、地形位置指数和地质等因素的权重可以忽略不计。根据致病因素的相对重要性,开发了两个模型:考虑9个因素的情景1和考虑所有17个因素的情景2。结果表明,在情景1和情景2中,16%和14%的区域分别被确定为非常高度滑坡易发区。在情景1和情景2中,高易感带面积分别占26%和25%。为了评估模型的准确性,使用30%的测试滑坡数据和同等数量的非滑坡数据点进行了接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线和质量和比方法。方案1和方案2的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.947和0.922,表明方案1的效率更高。方案1和方案2的质量和比分别为0.435和0.43。基于这些结果,情景1的LSZ地图被认为适合决策者解决与滑坡相关的开发和风险降低问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of index of entropy and Geospatial techniques for landslide prediction in Lunglei district, Mizoram, India

The present study focuses on developing a landslide susceptibility zonation (LSZ) using GIS-based bivariate statistical model in the Lunglei district of Mizoram. Initially, 17 factors were selected after calculating the multicollinearity test for LSZ. A landslide inventory map was created based on 234 historic landslide events, which were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Using the Index of Entropy (IOE) model, nine causative factors were identified as having significant weightage for LSZ: elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, normalized difference vegetation index, geomorphology, distance to road, distance to lineament, and distance to river. On the other hand, factors such as land use land cover, stream power index, terrain ruggedness index, terrain roughness, topographic wetness index, annual rainfall, topographic position index, and geology had negligible weightage. Based on the relative importance of the causative factors, two models were developed: scenario 1, which considered nine factors, and scenario 2, which considered all 17 factors. The results revealed that 16% and 14% of the district area were identified as very highly landslide prone in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. The high susceptibility zone accounted for 26% and 25% of the area in scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. To assess the accuracy of the models, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and quality sum ratio method was performed using 30% of the testing landslide data and an equal number of non-landslide data points. The area under the curve (AUC) for scenario 1 and scenario 2 were 0.947 and 0.922, respectively, indicating higher efficiency for scenario 1. The quality sum ratios were 0.435 and 0.43 for scenario 1 and scenario 2, respectively. Based on these results, the LSZ mapping from scenario 1 is considered suitable for policymakers to address development and risk reduction associated with landslides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review on the extreme rainfall studies in India Socioeconomic impacts of flooding and its coping strategies in Nigeria: Evidence from Dagiri community, Gwagwalada area council of Abuja Ecosysem-based approach to local flood risk management in Ogun State, Nigeria: Knowledge, and pathway to Actualisation Comprehensive seismic hazard assessment for Guwahati City, Northeast India: Insights from probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard analysis Source characteristics of earthquakes in Delhi and its vicinity: Implications for seismogenesis in the stable continental region of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1