{"title":"戴安娜48,没有空间的宇宙。亚里士多德与地方理论,那不勒斯,文献城,2017,290页,ISBN 978-8870886481, 29 - 75","authors":"Giulio Di Basilio","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this book Diana Quarantotto carries out an analysis of Aristotle’s conception of place. The title of the text, L’universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo (The universe without space: Aristotle and the theory of place) briefly encapsulates how Aristotle conceives of things’ location: space, as a three-dimensional extension existing independently of the things that occupy it, is not Aristotle’s considered understanding of location; rather for Aristotle things are in a place, for it is true of them to say that they are somewhere. Conversely, every portion of space turns out to be occupied by a body – if only by air – so that Aristotle’s universe is a plenum, that is, a universe where no space is empty. In such a universe, explains Quarantotto, to hypothesise the existence of space would be to multiply entities unnecessarily (p. 38). Since antiquity Aristotle’s theory of place has never failed to provoke controversy, and in fact has been rarely accepted as it stands. The theory has been deemed irremediably unsatisfying, ‘open to serious objections’ (Ross),1 ‘inadequate’ (Hussey),2 vel sim. In the recent debate, however, interpreters have started to reassess Aristotle’s theory and to pay due respect to its own philosophical merits. Quarantotto belongs to this camp in so far as she attempts to bring out the virtues of Aristotle’s theory; but she also highlights the reasons why such a theory may well fail to command agreement to contemporary readers. Quarantotto’s book consists of a close analysis of Aristotle’s Physics IV.1–5.3 Accordingly, the volume breaks down into 5 chapters, each chapter being devoted to its correspondent chapter in Aristotle’s Physics. The reader will find a glossary at the end, with key terms, as well as an index locorum. An introduction is devoted to frame Aristotle’s investigation within the larger project of his Physics. This makes for a succinct but highly illuminating lead-in to Aristotle’s treatise as","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"79 1","pages":"1 - 232 - 236 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diana Quarantotto, L’universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo, Bibliopolis, Naples, 2017, 290 p., ISBN 978-8870886481, € 29.75\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Di Basilio\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rhiz-2018-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this book Diana Quarantotto carries out an analysis of Aristotle’s conception of place. The title of the text, L’universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo (The universe without space: Aristotle and the theory of place) briefly encapsulates how Aristotle conceives of things’ location: space, as a three-dimensional extension existing independently of the things that occupy it, is not Aristotle’s considered understanding of location; rather for Aristotle things are in a place, for it is true of them to say that they are somewhere. Conversely, every portion of space turns out to be occupied by a body – if only by air – so that Aristotle’s universe is a plenum, that is, a universe where no space is empty. In such a universe, explains Quarantotto, to hypothesise the existence of space would be to multiply entities unnecessarily (p. 38). Since antiquity Aristotle’s theory of place has never failed to provoke controversy, and in fact has been rarely accepted as it stands. The theory has been deemed irremediably unsatisfying, ‘open to serious objections’ (Ross),1 ‘inadequate’ (Hussey),2 vel sim. In the recent debate, however, interpreters have started to reassess Aristotle’s theory and to pay due respect to its own philosophical merits. Quarantotto belongs to this camp in so far as she attempts to bring out the virtues of Aristotle’s theory; but she also highlights the reasons why such a theory may well fail to command agreement to contemporary readers. Quarantotto’s book consists of a close analysis of Aristotle’s Physics IV.1–5.3 Accordingly, the volume breaks down into 5 chapters, each chapter being devoted to its correspondent chapter in Aristotle’s Physics. The reader will find a glossary at the end, with key terms, as well as an index locorum. An introduction is devoted to frame Aristotle’s investigation within the larger project of his Physics. This makes for a succinct but highly illuminating lead-in to Aristotle’s treatise as\",\"PeriodicalId\":40571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 232 - 236 - 290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2018-0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这本书中,Diana Quarantotto对亚里士多德的地方概念进行了分析。这篇文章的标题是L ' universverso senza spazio。亚里士多德的《没有空间的宇宙:亚里士多德和位置理论》简要概括了亚里士多德对事物位置的看法:空间是独立于占据它的事物而存在的三维延伸,并不是亚里士多德对位置的理解;而对亚里士多德来说,事物是在一个地方,因为它们说它们在某个地方是对的。相反,空间的每一部分都被一个物体所占据——如果只是空气的话——所以亚里士多德的宇宙是一个充满空间的宇宙,也就是说,没有空间是空的。Quarantotto解释说,在这样一个宇宙中,假设空间的存在将是不必要地增加实体(第38页)。自古以来,亚里士多德的位置理论总是引起争议,事实上,很少有人接受它的立场。这个理论被认为是无法弥补的不令人满意,“有严重的反对意见”(罗斯),1“不充分”(赫西),2页。然而,在最近的争论中,解释者开始重新评估亚里士多德的理论,并对其自身的哲学价值给予应有的尊重。夸伦托属于这一阵营,因为她试图揭示亚里士多德理论的优点;但她也强调了为什么这种理论很可能无法得到当代读者的认同。Quarantotto的书包含了对亚里士多德物理学IV.1-5.3的详细分析,因此,全书分为5章,每一章都专门介绍亚里士多德物理学的相应章节。读者将在最后发现一个词汇表,其中包括关键术语,以及索引词典。一篇引言致力于将亚里士多德的研究框架置于他的物理学的更大项目中。这为亚里士多德的论著提供了一个简洁但极具启发性的引子
Diana Quarantotto, L’universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo, Bibliopolis, Naples, 2017, 290 p., ISBN 978-8870886481, € 29.75
In this book Diana Quarantotto carries out an analysis of Aristotle’s conception of place. The title of the text, L’universo senza spazio. Aristotele e la teoria del luogo (The universe without space: Aristotle and the theory of place) briefly encapsulates how Aristotle conceives of things’ location: space, as a three-dimensional extension existing independently of the things that occupy it, is not Aristotle’s considered understanding of location; rather for Aristotle things are in a place, for it is true of them to say that they are somewhere. Conversely, every portion of space turns out to be occupied by a body – if only by air – so that Aristotle’s universe is a plenum, that is, a universe where no space is empty. In such a universe, explains Quarantotto, to hypothesise the existence of space would be to multiply entities unnecessarily (p. 38). Since antiquity Aristotle’s theory of place has never failed to provoke controversy, and in fact has been rarely accepted as it stands. The theory has been deemed irremediably unsatisfying, ‘open to serious objections’ (Ross),1 ‘inadequate’ (Hussey),2 vel sim. In the recent debate, however, interpreters have started to reassess Aristotle’s theory and to pay due respect to its own philosophical merits. Quarantotto belongs to this camp in so far as she attempts to bring out the virtues of Aristotle’s theory; but she also highlights the reasons why such a theory may well fail to command agreement to contemporary readers. Quarantotto’s book consists of a close analysis of Aristotle’s Physics IV.1–5.3 Accordingly, the volume breaks down into 5 chapters, each chapter being devoted to its correspondent chapter in Aristotle’s Physics. The reader will find a glossary at the end, with key terms, as well as an index locorum. An introduction is devoted to frame Aristotle’s investigation within the larger project of his Physics. This makes for a succinct but highly illuminating lead-in to Aristotle’s treatise as