硫酸盐的原位LA-ICPMS U-Pb定年:碳酸盐标准物质作为基质匹配标准的适用性

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochronology Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.5194/gchron-4-601-2022
A. Beranoaguirre, I. Vasiliev, A. Gerdes
{"title":"硫酸盐的原位LA-ICPMS U-Pb定年:碳酸盐标准物质作为基质匹配标准的适用性","authors":"A. Beranoaguirre, I. Vasiliev, A. Gerdes","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-601-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Recent developments in analytical capabilities in the\nfield of in situ laser ablation mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) have expanded\nthe applications of U–Pb geochronometers in low-U minerals such as\ncarbonates or garnets. The rapid evolution of the technique relies on\nwell-characterized matrix-matched reference materials. In this article, we\nexplore the suitability of using carbonate as an “almost-matrix-matched\nreference material” for in situ U–Pb dating of sulfates. For such purpose, we have used the astrochronologically dated gypsum and anhydrite samples deposited during the Messinian Salinity Crisis (5.97–5.33 Ma) and compared these dates with the U–Pb ages obtained by LA-ICPMS. Although the majority of the samples failed due to the elevated common Pb content and low 238U/204Pb ratios, five of the samples showed a higher dispersion\non U/Pb ratios. The obtained dates in four of these samples are comparable with the expected ages, while another gave an unexpected younger age, each of them with 6 %–11 % of uncertainty. The pit depth of the spots showed that the sulfates ablate similar to carbonates, so the offset due to the crater geometry mismatch or downhole fractionation can be assumed to be negligible. To sum up, the bias between the U–Pb and expected cyclostratigraphic ages, if any, is included in the uncertainty, and thus the results obtained here suggest that carbonate reference material is currently the best option for standardization of in situ U–Pb sulfate analyses.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In situ LA-ICPMS U–Pb dating of sulfates: applicability of carbonate reference materials as matrix-matched standards\",\"authors\":\"A. Beranoaguirre, I. Vasiliev, A. Gerdes\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gchron-4-601-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Recent developments in analytical capabilities in the\\nfield of in situ laser ablation mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) have expanded\\nthe applications of U–Pb geochronometers in low-U minerals such as\\ncarbonates or garnets. The rapid evolution of the technique relies on\\nwell-characterized matrix-matched reference materials. In this article, we\\nexplore the suitability of using carbonate as an “almost-matrix-matched\\nreference material” for in situ U–Pb dating of sulfates. For such purpose, we have used the astrochronologically dated gypsum and anhydrite samples deposited during the Messinian Salinity Crisis (5.97–5.33 Ma) and compared these dates with the U–Pb ages obtained by LA-ICPMS. Although the majority of the samples failed due to the elevated common Pb content and low 238U/204Pb ratios, five of the samples showed a higher dispersion\\non U/Pb ratios. The obtained dates in four of these samples are comparable with the expected ages, while another gave an unexpected younger age, each of them with 6 %–11 % of uncertainty. The pit depth of the spots showed that the sulfates ablate similar to carbonates, so the offset due to the crater geometry mismatch or downhole fractionation can be assumed to be negligible. To sum up, the bias between the U–Pb and expected cyclostratigraphic ages, if any, is included in the uncertainty, and thus the results obtained here suggest that carbonate reference material is currently the best option for standardization of in situ U–Pb sulfate analyses.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-601-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-601-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要原位激光烧蚀质谱(LA-ICPMS)分析能力的最新发展扩大了U-Pb地球时计在低u矿物(如碳酸盐或石榴石)中的应用。该技术的快速发展依赖于表征良好的基质匹配参考物质。在本文中,我们探讨了使用碳酸盐作为“几乎与基质匹配的参考物质”的适用性,用于硫酸盐的原位U-Pb定年。为此,我们使用了在墨西尼亚盐度危机时期(5.97-5.33 Ma)沉积的石膏和硬石膏样品,并将这些日期与LA-ICPMS获得的U-Pb年龄进行了比较。虽然大多数样品由于普通Pb含量升高和238U/204Pb比低而失败,但有5个样品表现出较高的分散U/Pb比。其中四个样本的所得日期与预期年龄相当,而另一个样本的年龄出乎意料地更小,每个样本都有6% - 11%的不确定性。这些斑点的坑深表明,硫酸盐与碳酸盐类似,因此由于陨石坑几何形状不匹配或井下分馏造成的偏移可以忽略不计。综上所述,不确定性中包含了U-Pb和预期旋回地层年龄之间的偏差(如果有的话),因此本文获得的结果表明,碳酸盐基准物质是目前原位U-Pb硫酸盐分析标准化的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In situ LA-ICPMS U–Pb dating of sulfates: applicability of carbonate reference materials as matrix-matched standards
Abstract. Recent developments in analytical capabilities in the field of in situ laser ablation mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) have expanded the applications of U–Pb geochronometers in low-U minerals such as carbonates or garnets. The rapid evolution of the technique relies on well-characterized matrix-matched reference materials. In this article, we explore the suitability of using carbonate as an “almost-matrix-matched reference material” for in situ U–Pb dating of sulfates. For such purpose, we have used the astrochronologically dated gypsum and anhydrite samples deposited during the Messinian Salinity Crisis (5.97–5.33 Ma) and compared these dates with the U–Pb ages obtained by LA-ICPMS. Although the majority of the samples failed due to the elevated common Pb content and low 238U/204Pb ratios, five of the samples showed a higher dispersion on U/Pb ratios. The obtained dates in four of these samples are comparable with the expected ages, while another gave an unexpected younger age, each of them with 6 %–11 % of uncertainty. The pit depth of the spots showed that the sulfates ablate similar to carbonates, so the offset due to the crater geometry mismatch or downhole fractionation can be assumed to be negligible. To sum up, the bias between the U–Pb and expected cyclostratigraphic ages, if any, is included in the uncertainty, and thus the results obtained here suggest that carbonate reference material is currently the best option for standardization of in situ U–Pb sulfate analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geochronological and geochemical effects of zircon chemical abrasion: insights from single-crystal stepwise dissolution experiments The marine reservoir age of Greenland coastal waters Late Neogene terrestrial climate reconstruction of the central Namib Desert derived by the combination of U–Pb silcrete and terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating Early Holocene ice retreat from Isle Royale in the Laurentian Great Lakes constrained with 10Be exposure-age dating Technical note: Darkroom lighting for luminescence dating laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1