定义罗马的神性:纪念s·r·f·普莱斯

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Transactions of the American Philological Association Pub Date : 2012-05-10 DOI:10.1353/APA.2012.0001
D. Levene
{"title":"定义罗马的神性:纪念s·r·f·普莱斯","authors":"D. Levene","doi":"10.1353/APA.2012.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent analysis of the imperial cult has argued that it can be best understood in terms of the lack of a fundamental division between gods and humans at Rome worshiping a human as a god was accordingly not a transgressive act. This paper challenges this interpretation, demonstrating that gods and humans were indeed usually conceived as separate species of being. The imperial cult was thus transgressive in theory; however, it primarily operated in contexts where that could be overlooked and the worship of humans as gods accordingly appeared unproblematic.","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"79 1","pages":"41 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the Divine in Rome: In memoriam S. R. F. Price\",\"authors\":\"D. Levene\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/APA.2012.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent analysis of the imperial cult has argued that it can be best understood in terms of the lack of a fundamental division between gods and humans at Rome worshiping a human as a god was accordingly not a transgressive act. This paper challenges this interpretation, demonstrating that gods and humans were indeed usually conceived as separate species of being. The imperial cult was thus transgressive in theory; however, it primarily operated in contexts where that could be overlooked and the worship of humans as gods accordingly appeared unproblematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2012.0001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2012.0001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

最近对帝国崇拜的分析认为,最好的理解是,在罗马,神与人之间缺乏根本的区分,因此,把人当作神来崇拜并不是一种违法行为。这篇论文挑战了这种解释,证明神和人确实通常被认为是不同的物种。因此,帝王崇拜在理论上是违法的;然而,它主要是在可以忽略这一点的情况下运作的,因此,将人类崇拜为神似乎是没有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining the Divine in Rome: In memoriam S. R. F. Price
Recent analysis of the imperial cult has argued that it can be best understood in terms of the lack of a fundamental division between gods and humans at Rome worshiping a human as a god was accordingly not a transgressive act. This paper challenges this interpretation, demonstrating that gods and humans were indeed usually conceived as separate species of being. The imperial cult was thus transgressive in theory; however, it primarily operated in contexts where that could be overlooked and the worship of humans as gods accordingly appeared unproblematic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.
期刊最新文献
Becoming a Place: Speaking Landscapes in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo The Platonic Epistles and Fanaticism in the History of Philosophy: Meiners, Tiedemann, and Kant Erotic Epistemology, Cult Didactic Rhetoric, and the "Mysteries of Venus" in Ovid's Ars amatoria 2.601–40 List of Abbreviations The State of the Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1