诱导反应样运动对大鼠学习和康复的促进作用(专题社论:《ABE》5篇精选文章)

Hiroto Sano, H. Kaneko, Y. Hasegawa
{"title":"诱导反应样运动对大鼠学习和康复的促进作用(专题社论:《ABE》5篇精选文章)","authors":"Hiroto Sano, H. Kaneko, Y. Hasegawa","doi":"10.14326/ABE.2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated the effects of forced response-like movements on serial reversal learning of a sensorimotor task in normal and hemiplegic (unilateral cortical lesion in the forepaw sensorimotor area) rats. The rats were trained to respond to an air-puff stimulus applied to one forepaw; the response involved releasing either the stimulated or non-stimulated forepaw from a lever. During the training, an error trial was followed by a correction trial wherein a lever on the correct-response side (n=4 in each group) or the incorrect-response side (n=4 in each group) was automatically elevated at 220 ms after the air-puff stimulation, mimicking the ratsʼ lever-release movement. No lever activation was applied to the rats in the control condition (n=4 in each group). We found that learning speed was generally facilitated by the lever activation procedure on the incorrectresponse side, but not on the correct-response side. As an exception, however, lever activation on the correctresponse side facilitated learning in the contralesional (paralyzed side) forepaw of the hemiplegic group. Reaction time was not affected by the lever activation procedure, although it was longer for the contralesional forepaw compared to the ipsilesional forepaw in the hemiplegic group and both forepaws in the normal group. We conclude that the sensory inputs induced by the same forced response-like movement facilitate learning or rehabilitation differently in normal and hemiplegic rats. The results and the animal model in this study are useful for the development of more efficient motion-assisting devices for rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":39233,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":"234-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitation of Learning and Rehabilitation in Rats by Inducing Response-like Movement (Special Editorials : Five Selected Articles in ABE)\",\"authors\":\"Hiroto Sano, H. Kaneko, Y. Hasegawa\",\"doi\":\"10.14326/ABE.2.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated the effects of forced response-like movements on serial reversal learning of a sensorimotor task in normal and hemiplegic (unilateral cortical lesion in the forepaw sensorimotor area) rats. The rats were trained to respond to an air-puff stimulus applied to one forepaw; the response involved releasing either the stimulated or non-stimulated forepaw from a lever. During the training, an error trial was followed by a correction trial wherein a lever on the correct-response side (n=4 in each group) or the incorrect-response side (n=4 in each group) was automatically elevated at 220 ms after the air-puff stimulation, mimicking the ratsʼ lever-release movement. No lever activation was applied to the rats in the control condition (n=4 in each group). We found that learning speed was generally facilitated by the lever activation procedure on the incorrectresponse side, but not on the correct-response side. As an exception, however, lever activation on the correctresponse side facilitated learning in the contralesional (paralyzed side) forepaw of the hemiplegic group. Reaction time was not affected by the lever activation procedure, although it was longer for the contralesional forepaw compared to the ipsilesional forepaw in the hemiplegic group and both forepaws in the normal group. We conclude that the sensory inputs induced by the same forced response-like movement facilitate learning or rehabilitation differently in normal and hemiplegic rats. The results and the animal model in this study are useful for the development of more efficient motion-assisting devices for rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"234-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14326/ABE.2.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14326/ABE.2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们研究了强迫反应类运动对正常和偏瘫大鼠(前爪感觉运动区单侧皮质损伤)感觉运动任务连续反转学习的影响。老鼠被训练对施加在一只前爪上的充气刺激做出反应;反应包括从杠杆上释放受刺激或未受刺激的前爪。在训练过程中,错误试验之后是纠正试验,其中在吹气刺激后220 ms自动升高正确反应侧(每组n=4)或错误反应侧(每组n=4)的杠杆,模仿大鼠的杠杆释放运动。对照组大鼠不进行杠杆激活(每组n=4)。我们发现,在错误反应侧,杠杆激活程序通常会促进学习速度,而在正确反应侧则不会。然而,作为一个例外,正确反应侧的杠杆激活促进了偏瘫组对侧(瘫痪侧)前爪的学习。反应时间不受杠杆激活程序的影响,尽管与偏瘫组的同病变前爪和正常组的双前爪相比,对侧前爪的反应时间更长。我们得出结论,在正常和偏瘫大鼠中,相同的强迫反应运动诱导的感觉输入对学习或康复的促进是不同的。本研究的结果和动物模型为开发更有效的运动辅助康复装置提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facilitation of Learning and Rehabilitation in Rats by Inducing Response-like Movement (Special Editorials : Five Selected Articles in ABE)
We investigated the effects of forced response-like movements on serial reversal learning of a sensorimotor task in normal and hemiplegic (unilateral cortical lesion in the forepaw sensorimotor area) rats. The rats were trained to respond to an air-puff stimulus applied to one forepaw; the response involved releasing either the stimulated or non-stimulated forepaw from a lever. During the training, an error trial was followed by a correction trial wherein a lever on the correct-response side (n=4 in each group) or the incorrect-response side (n=4 in each group) was automatically elevated at 220 ms after the air-puff stimulation, mimicking the ratsʼ lever-release movement. No lever activation was applied to the rats in the control condition (n=4 in each group). We found that learning speed was generally facilitated by the lever activation procedure on the incorrectresponse side, but not on the correct-response side. As an exception, however, lever activation on the correctresponse side facilitated learning in the contralesional (paralyzed side) forepaw of the hemiplegic group. Reaction time was not affected by the lever activation procedure, although it was longer for the contralesional forepaw compared to the ipsilesional forepaw in the hemiplegic group and both forepaws in the normal group. We conclude that the sensory inputs induced by the same forced response-like movement facilitate learning or rehabilitation differently in normal and hemiplegic rats. The results and the animal model in this study are useful for the development of more efficient motion-assisting devices for rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency detection during car driving using phase-locking index of EEG Estimation of the retinotopic map of an awake mouse brain based upon intrinsic optical signal imaging considering the ocular position and variation in pupil diameter Data-driven formulation of surgical procedures through virtual planning The Wearable Device for Acute Mountain Sickness by Using SpO2 measurement Current status and future perspective of bridge to lung transplantation using ECMO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1