在变化和不确定的时代进行评估和学习

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480
Therese N. Hopfenbeck
{"title":"在变化和不确定的时代进行评估和学习","authors":"Therese N. Hopfenbeck","doi":"10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year we left behind, 2021, was a year like no other, with the pandemic impacting students’ learning and assessment globally. While some countries have decided to open up, other countries have adopted a stricter approach and still use lockdown in areas of COVID outbreak. The impact of school lockdowns for students’ learning and the assessment of their achievements following pandemic will be the theme for a forthcoming Special Issue in this journal (O’Leary & Hayward to be published). What we already know, is that we are still in challenging times, where uncertainty is in the centre of our lives. Even worse, the uncertainty now includes dreadful scenes from the war in Ukraine, where children, instead of going to school and preparing for their exams this Spring, are fleeing their country in fear of bombs. Wars, whether they occur in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Syria, or Yemen, are taking away the future of a generation of children who should be living together peacefully, connecting through music and art, preparing for adulthood, and developing the skills to solve problems we have not yet discovered. In challenging times, with a global pandemic, wars and personal losses, it is worth reminding ourselves of the reasons so many of us committed our lives to education. In Europe, the President of the assessment organisation AEA-Europe, Dr Christina Wikström, made the following statement to members in March 2022: ‘We place our trust in all our members, irrespective of nationality, to always stand up for peace, democracy, and equality for all. We must also work together in our scholarly profession since scholarship is necessary for the survival and prosperity of humanity’ (Wikström, 2022). It is in this spirit we publish the first 2022 issue of Assessment in Education – knowing that education matters, and particularly in times of uncertainty and challenges. As an international journal, we hope that researchers will continue to connect, collaborate, and stand up for the values which enhance learning for all students, no matter which continent they live on. We owe it to them to offer aspirations for the future, and quality education for all can provide that hope. In the first article in this regular issue, Steinmann et al. (this issue) presents findings from a study investigating the reliability of questionnaire scales. Student self-report scales have been known for their limitations, both with respect to validity and reliability (Samuelstuen & Bråten, 2007; Samuelstuen et al., 2007), but the current study specifically investigates the use of mixed wording in items used in international large-scale studies. More specifically, students were asked to report their agreement on items, such as ‘I usually do well in mathematics’ and ‘I am just not good at mathematics’, mixing positive and negative statements. Steinmann et al. used data from the international IEA studies PIRLS and TIMSS 2011, to further investigate how students responded to these scales, and demonstrated that 2–36% of ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: PRINCIPLES, POLICY & PRACTICE 2022, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment and learning in times of change and uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Therese N. Hopfenbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year we left behind, 2021, was a year like no other, with the pandemic impacting students’ learning and assessment globally. While some countries have decided to open up, other countries have adopted a stricter approach and still use lockdown in areas of COVID outbreak. The impact of school lockdowns for students’ learning and the assessment of their achievements following pandemic will be the theme for a forthcoming Special Issue in this journal (O’Leary & Hayward to be published). What we already know, is that we are still in challenging times, where uncertainty is in the centre of our lives. Even worse, the uncertainty now includes dreadful scenes from the war in Ukraine, where children, instead of going to school and preparing for their exams this Spring, are fleeing their country in fear of bombs. Wars, whether they occur in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Syria, or Yemen, are taking away the future of a generation of children who should be living together peacefully, connecting through music and art, preparing for adulthood, and developing the skills to solve problems we have not yet discovered. In challenging times, with a global pandemic, wars and personal losses, it is worth reminding ourselves of the reasons so many of us committed our lives to education. In Europe, the President of the assessment organisation AEA-Europe, Dr Christina Wikström, made the following statement to members in March 2022: ‘We place our trust in all our members, irrespective of nationality, to always stand up for peace, democracy, and equality for all. We must also work together in our scholarly profession since scholarship is necessary for the survival and prosperity of humanity’ (Wikström, 2022). It is in this spirit we publish the first 2022 issue of Assessment in Education – knowing that education matters, and particularly in times of uncertainty and challenges. As an international journal, we hope that researchers will continue to connect, collaborate, and stand up for the values which enhance learning for all students, no matter which continent they live on. We owe it to them to offer aspirations for the future, and quality education for all can provide that hope. In the first article in this regular issue, Steinmann et al. (this issue) presents findings from a study investigating the reliability of questionnaire scales. Student self-report scales have been known for their limitations, both with respect to validity and reliability (Samuelstuen & Bråten, 2007; Samuelstuen et al., 2007), but the current study specifically investigates the use of mixed wording in items used in international large-scale studies. More specifically, students were asked to report their agreement on items, such as ‘I usually do well in mathematics’ and ‘I am just not good at mathematics’, mixing positive and negative statements. Steinmann et al. used data from the international IEA studies PIRLS and TIMSS 2011, to further investigate how students responded to these scales, and demonstrated that 2–36% of ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: PRINCIPLES, POLICY & PRACTICE 2022, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480\",\"PeriodicalId\":51515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们离开的那一年,即2021年,是与众不同的一年,疫情影响了全球学生的学习和评估。虽然一些国家决定开放,但其他国家采取了更严格的措施,仍在疫情暴发地区采取封锁措施。大流行后学校封锁对学生学习和成绩评估的影响将是本杂志即将出版的一期特刊的主题(O ' leary & Hayward即将出版)。我们已经知道的是,我们仍然处于充满挑战的时代,不确定性是我们生活的中心。更糟糕的是,现在的不确定性包括乌克兰战争中的可怕场景,那里的孩子们因为害怕炸弹而逃离了他们的国家,而不是去上学,准备今年春天的考试。战争,无论是发生在阿富汗、埃塞俄比亚、叙利亚还是也门,都在夺走这一代儿童的未来。他们本应和平共处,通过音乐和艺术相互联系,为成年做准备,并培养解决我们尚未发现的问题的技能。在全球大流行、战争和个人损失的充满挑战的时代,我们有必要提醒自己,我们这么多人献出生命致力于教育的原因。在欧洲,评估组织欧洲原子能机构(AEA-Europe)主席克里斯蒂娜博士Wikström于2022年3月向成员发表了以下声明:“我们相信所有成员,无论国籍,都将始终捍卫所有人的和平、民主和平等。”我们也必须在我们的学术职业中共同努力,因为学术是人类生存和繁荣的必要条件”(Wikström, 2022)。正是本着这种精神,我们出版了2022年第一期《教育评估》——我们深知教育至关重要,尤其是在充满不确定性和挑战的时代。作为一份国际期刊,我们希望研究人员将继续联系、合作,并为促进所有学生学习的价值观挺身而出,无论他们生活在哪个大洲。我们有责任为他们提供对未来的憧憬,而全民优质教育可以提供这种希望。在本期的第一篇文章中,Steinmann等人(本期)提出了一项调查问卷量表可靠性的研究结果。学生自我报告量表以其有效性和可靠性方面的局限性而闻名(Samuelstuen & bramatten, 2007;Samuelstuen et al., 2007),但目前的研究专门调查了国际大规模研究中使用的项目中混合措辞的使用情况。更具体地说,学生们被要求报告他们对一些问题的认同,比如“我通常数学学得很好”和“我只是不擅长数学”,其中包括积极和消极的陈述。Steinmann等人使用国际能源署研究PIRLS和TIMSS 2011的数据,进一步调查了学生对这些量表的反应,并证明了2-36%的评估在教育中:原则,政策和实践2022,VOL. 29, NO. 6。1,1 - 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment and learning in times of change and uncertainty
The year we left behind, 2021, was a year like no other, with the pandemic impacting students’ learning and assessment globally. While some countries have decided to open up, other countries have adopted a stricter approach and still use lockdown in areas of COVID outbreak. The impact of school lockdowns for students’ learning and the assessment of their achievements following pandemic will be the theme for a forthcoming Special Issue in this journal (O’Leary & Hayward to be published). What we already know, is that we are still in challenging times, where uncertainty is in the centre of our lives. Even worse, the uncertainty now includes dreadful scenes from the war in Ukraine, where children, instead of going to school and preparing for their exams this Spring, are fleeing their country in fear of bombs. Wars, whether they occur in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Syria, or Yemen, are taking away the future of a generation of children who should be living together peacefully, connecting through music and art, preparing for adulthood, and developing the skills to solve problems we have not yet discovered. In challenging times, with a global pandemic, wars and personal losses, it is worth reminding ourselves of the reasons so many of us committed our lives to education. In Europe, the President of the assessment organisation AEA-Europe, Dr Christina Wikström, made the following statement to members in March 2022: ‘We place our trust in all our members, irrespective of nationality, to always stand up for peace, democracy, and equality for all. We must also work together in our scholarly profession since scholarship is necessary for the survival and prosperity of humanity’ (Wikström, 2022). It is in this spirit we publish the first 2022 issue of Assessment in Education – knowing that education matters, and particularly in times of uncertainty and challenges. As an international journal, we hope that researchers will continue to connect, collaborate, and stand up for the values which enhance learning for all students, no matter which continent they live on. We owe it to them to offer aspirations for the future, and quality education for all can provide that hope. In the first article in this regular issue, Steinmann et al. (this issue) presents findings from a study investigating the reliability of questionnaire scales. Student self-report scales have been known for their limitations, both with respect to validity and reliability (Samuelstuen & Bråten, 2007; Samuelstuen et al., 2007), but the current study specifically investigates the use of mixed wording in items used in international large-scale studies. More specifically, students were asked to report their agreement on items, such as ‘I usually do well in mathematics’ and ‘I am just not good at mathematics’, mixing positive and negative statements. Steinmann et al. used data from the international IEA studies PIRLS and TIMSS 2011, to further investigate how students responded to these scales, and demonstrated that 2–36% of ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: PRINCIPLES, POLICY & PRACTICE 2022, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2068480
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice
Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Recent decades have witnessed significant developments in the field of educational assessment. New approaches to the assessment of student achievement have been complemented by the increasing prominence of educational assessment as a policy issue. In particular, there has been a growth of interest in modes of assessment that promote, as well as measure, standards and quality. These have profound implications for individual learners, institutions and the educational system itself. Assessment in Education provides a focus for scholarly output in the field of assessment. The journal is explicitly international in focus and encourages contributions from a wide range of assessment systems and cultures. The journal''s intention is to explore both commonalities and differences in policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
EduSEL-R – the refined educators’ social-emotional learning questionnaire: expanded scope and improved validity Mapping oral feedback interactions in young pupils’ writing A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles Surprising Insights: rethinking Grades, Exams, and Assessment Cultures The conceptualisation implies the statistical model: implications for measuring domains of teaching quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1