间充质干细胞在烧伤创面治疗中的应用

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.3390/ebj3040043
Astrid Jenssen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, E. Kankuri, Ragnvald Brekke, A. Guttormsen, B. Gjertsen, K. Mustafa, S. Almeland
{"title":"间充质干细胞在烧伤创面治疗中的应用","authors":"Astrid Jenssen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, E. Kankuri, Ragnvald Brekke, A. Guttormsen, B. Gjertsen, K. Mustafa, S. Almeland","doi":"10.3390/ebj3040043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cellular therapies for burn wound healing, including the administration of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs), have shown promising results. This review aims to provide an overview of the current administration methods in preclinical and clinical studies of bone-marrow-, adipose-tissue-, and umbilical-cord-derived MSCs for treating burn wounds. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search in PubMed and Embase and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Additional relevant studies were identified through a manual search of reference lists. A total of sixty-nine studies were included in this review. Of the included studies, only five had clinical data from patients, one was a prospective case–control, three were case reports, and one was a case series. Administration methods used were local injection (41% in preclinical and 40% in clinical studies), cell-seeded scaffolds (35% and 20%), topical application (17% and 60%), and systemic injection (1% and 0%). There was great heterogeneity between the studies regarding experimental models, administration methods, and cell dosages. Local injection was the most common administration method in animal studies, while topical application was used in most clinical reports. The best delivery method of MSCs in burn wounds is yet to be identified. Although the potential of MSC treatment for burn wounds is promising, future research should focus on examining the effect and scalability of such therapy in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administration Methods of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Burn Wounds\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Jenssen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, E. Kankuri, Ragnvald Brekke, A. Guttormsen, B. Gjertsen, K. Mustafa, S. Almeland\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ebj3040043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cellular therapies for burn wound healing, including the administration of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs), have shown promising results. This review aims to provide an overview of the current administration methods in preclinical and clinical studies of bone-marrow-, adipose-tissue-, and umbilical-cord-derived MSCs for treating burn wounds. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search in PubMed and Embase and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Additional relevant studies were identified through a manual search of reference lists. A total of sixty-nine studies were included in this review. Of the included studies, only five had clinical data from patients, one was a prospective case–control, three were case reports, and one was a case series. Administration methods used were local injection (41% in preclinical and 40% in clinical studies), cell-seeded scaffolds (35% and 20%), topical application (17% and 60%), and systemic injection (1% and 0%). There was great heterogeneity between the studies regarding experimental models, administration methods, and cell dosages. Local injection was the most common administration method in animal studies, while topical application was used in most clinical reports. The best delivery method of MSCs in burn wounds is yet to be identified. Although the potential of MSC treatment for burn wounds is promising, future research should focus on examining the effect and scalability of such therapy in clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European burn journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European burn journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3040043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3040043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤创面愈合的细胞疗法,包括间充质干细胞或基质细胞(MSCs)的应用,已经显示出有希望的结果。本文综述了目前骨髓、脂肪组织和脐带来源的间充质干细胞治疗烧伤创面的临床前和临床研究中的给药方法。通过PubMed和Embase的文献检索确定相关研究,并根据纳入和排除标准进行资格筛选。通过人工检索参考文献清单确定了其他相关研究。本综述共纳入69项研究。在纳入的研究中,只有5项有患者的临床数据,1项是前瞻性病例对照,3项是病例报告,1项是病例系列。使用的给药方法有局部注射(临床前41%,临床研究40%)、细胞种子支架(35%和20%)、外用(17%和60%)和全身注射(1%和0%)。这些研究在实验模型、给药方法和细胞剂量方面存在很大的异质性。在动物实验中,局部注射是最常见的给药方法,而在大多数临床报告中,使用外用给药。骨髓间充质干细胞在烧伤创面的最佳递送方法尚未确定。虽然间充质干细胞治疗烧伤创面的潜力是有希望的,但未来的研究应侧重于在临床试验中检查这种治疗的效果和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Administration Methods of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Burn Wounds
Cellular therapies for burn wound healing, including the administration of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSCs), have shown promising results. This review aims to provide an overview of the current administration methods in preclinical and clinical studies of bone-marrow-, adipose-tissue-, and umbilical-cord-derived MSCs for treating burn wounds. Relevant studies were identified through a literature search in PubMed and Embase and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Additional relevant studies were identified through a manual search of reference lists. A total of sixty-nine studies were included in this review. Of the included studies, only five had clinical data from patients, one was a prospective case–control, three were case reports, and one was a case series. Administration methods used were local injection (41% in preclinical and 40% in clinical studies), cell-seeded scaffolds (35% and 20%), topical application (17% and 60%), and systemic injection (1% and 0%). There was great heterogeneity between the studies regarding experimental models, administration methods, and cell dosages. Local injection was the most common administration method in animal studies, while topical application was used in most clinical reports. The best delivery method of MSCs in burn wounds is yet to be identified. Although the potential of MSC treatment for burn wounds is promising, future research should focus on examining the effect and scalability of such therapy in clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balance Impairment in the Burn Population: A Burn Model System National Database Study Resource Requirements in a Burn Mass Casualty Event Hypnosis in Burn Care: Efficacy, Applications, and Implications for Austere Settings Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors’ Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects European Burns Association (EBA)—Summer 2024 News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1