模拟英国硫沉积的长期趋势

D.S. Lee, R.D. Kingdon
{"title":"模拟英国硫沉积的长期趋势","authors":"D.S. Lee,&nbsp;R.D. Kingdon","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO<sub>2</sub> has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101025,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling long-term trends in UK sulphur deposition\",\"authors\":\"D.S. Lee,&nbsp;R.D. Kingdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO<sub>2</sub> has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO<sub>2</sub> sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00090-9\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464190901000909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464190901000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在英国尺度上,二氧化硫(SO2)干沉降的下降速度快于二氧化硫排放量的下降速度,而S湿沉降的下降速度慢于排放量的下降速度。提出了三个假设来解释这种对排放变化的非线性响应:排放有效释放高度的变化;过去几年二氧化硫的氧化可能受到氧化剂的限制;冠层对SO2的抗性随氨浓度的变化而变化。在这三个假设中,第一个已经在这里使用10层拉格朗日酸沉积模型进行了测试。该模型再现了观测到的总S沉积的下降速率,但没有再现其幅度。模拟和观测到的英国硫沉积的量级不匹配与模式框架及其局限性是一致的。更重要的是,该模型没有重现使用两组不同的英国排放数据所观察到的英国湿沉降和干沉降比例的变化。英国提供的排放数据显示,1989-1994年期间,低水平二氧化硫源占总量的比例有小幅上升,而高水平二氧化硫源的比例有小幅下降。这些变化与观测到的SO2浓度变化以及干湿S沉积的变化并不明显一致。因此,模型不能模拟观测到的湿沉积和干沉积部分的变化并不奇怪。目前的模拟和排放数据的限制导致未来总S沉积变化率的情景对于远离源的湿沉积为主的地区可能是乐观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling long-term trends in UK sulphur deposition

On the UK-scale, sulphur dioxide (SO2) dry deposition has declined at a faster rate than SO2 emissions, but S wet deposition has declined at a slower rate than emissions. Three hypotheses have been put forward to explain this non-linear response to changes in emissions: changes in the effective release height of emissions; oxidation of SO2 may have been oxidant limited in previous years; the canopy resistance of SO2 has changed in response to changing ammonia concentrations. Of these three hypotheses, the first has been tested here using a 10-layer Lagrangian acid deposition model. The model reproduced the rate of decline of observed total S deposition but not the magnitude. The mismatch in magnitude between modelled and observed UK S deposition is consistent with the model framework and its limitations. More importantly, the model did not reproduce the changes in the proportions of wet and dry deposition to the UK that have been observed using two different sets of UK emission data. The UK-derived emissions data show a small increase in the proportion of low-level SO2 sources to the total and a small decrease in proportion of the high-level SO2 sources over the period 1989–1994. These changes are not apparently consistent with observed changes in SO2 concentrations nor changes in wet and dry S deposition. Thus, it is unsurprising that the modelling does not simulate the observed changes in fractions of wet and dry deposition. The current constraints of the modelling and the emissions data have the consequence that future scenarios of rates of change of total S deposition may be optimistic for locations that are dominated by wet deposition, remote from sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Author index Erratum Editorial board Preface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1