{"title":"宫腔镜异常和无妇科疾病人群中观察到的异常的患病率","authors":"G. Van Der Leij md, F. B. Lammes md phd","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the prevalence of hysteroscopically observed abnormalities and anomalies in a population without gynaecological complaints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Analysis of the hysteroscopic observations in 503 patients who consented to have a hysteroscopic tubal occlusion attempt for sterilization (Ovabloc<sup>R</sup> procedure).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Outpatient department of a general hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of polyps was found to be 0.032, of fibroids 0.034, of intrauterine adhesions 0.040 and all Müllerian variations 0.152. The prevalence of fibroids and intrauterine adhesions was found to be age dependent. The incidence of Müllerian variations decreased as parity increased. Post-delivery and abortion curettage were a cause of intrauterine adhesions in only a minority of our patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the hysteroscopic work-up of patients presenting with fertility problems and patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, one should consider the prevalence of intrauterine abnormalities and anomalies in asymptomatic women. Adhesions around the tubal orifices could be indicative of a tubal obstruction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"6 6","pages":"347-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of hysteroscopic abnormalities and anomalies observed in a population without gynaecological complaints\",\"authors\":\"G. Van Der Leij md, F. B. Lammes md phd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the prevalence of hysteroscopically observed abnormalities and anomalies in a population without gynaecological complaints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Analysis of the hysteroscopic observations in 503 patients who consented to have a hysteroscopic tubal occlusion attempt for sterilization (Ovabloc<sup>R</sup> procedure).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Outpatient department of a general hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prevalence of polyps was found to be 0.032, of fibroids 0.034, of intrauterine adhesions 0.040 and all Müllerian variations 0.152. The prevalence of fibroids and intrauterine adhesions was found to be age dependent. The incidence of Müllerian variations decreased as parity increased. Post-delivery and abortion curettage were a cause of intrauterine adhesions in only a minority of our patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the hysteroscopic work-up of patients presenting with fertility problems and patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, one should consider the prevalence of intrauterine abnormalities and anomalies in asymptomatic women. Adhesions around the tubal orifices could be indicative of a tubal obstruction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"347-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.144-gy0552.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of hysteroscopic abnormalities and anomalies observed in a population without gynaecological complaints
Objective
To investigate the prevalence of hysteroscopically observed abnormalities and anomalies in a population without gynaecological complaints.
Design
Analysis of the hysteroscopic observations in 503 patients who consented to have a hysteroscopic tubal occlusion attempt for sterilization (OvablocR procedure).
Setting
Outpatient department of a general hospital.
Results
The prevalence of polyps was found to be 0.032, of fibroids 0.034, of intrauterine adhesions 0.040 and all Müllerian variations 0.152. The prevalence of fibroids and intrauterine adhesions was found to be age dependent. The incidence of Müllerian variations decreased as parity increased. Post-delivery and abortion curettage were a cause of intrauterine adhesions in only a minority of our patients.
Conclusions
In the hysteroscopic work-up of patients presenting with fertility problems and patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, one should consider the prevalence of intrauterine abnormalities and anomalies in asymptomatic women. Adhesions around the tubal orifices could be indicative of a tubal obstruction.