{"title":"非球面多焦人工晶状体的临床评价及其对发展中国家的意义。","authors":"S. Kaushik, Kamlesh","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate the clinical performance of a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare the results with a corresponding monofocal IOL.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nTwo groups of 20 patients each were implanted with a multifocal and monofocal IOL and prospectively studied. Distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and quality of vision were assessed in both groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn 85% of multifocal cases and 100% of monofocal cases, the corrected distance vision was 6/9 or better. With distance correction, 80% of multifocal cases had near vision of N9 or better against 10% of monofocal cases. The mean addition required for near vision N6 was +0.8 diopters (D) and +2.6 D in the multifocal and monofocal groups, respectively. Multifocal cases showed significantly decreased contrast sensitivity and increased depth of focus.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMultifocal IOLs are a good option for those with nonexacting visual requirements. The loss in contrast sensitivity seems to be an acceptable trade-off for satisfactory unaided near vision.","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"30 1","pages":"298-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical evaluation of an aspheric multifocal intraocular lens and its implications for the developing world.\",\"authors\":\"S. Kaushik, Kamlesh\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\\nTo evaluate the clinical performance of a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare the results with a corresponding monofocal IOL.\\n\\n\\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\\nTwo groups of 20 patients each were implanted with a multifocal and monofocal IOL and prospectively studied. Distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and quality of vision were assessed in both groups.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIn 85% of multifocal cases and 100% of monofocal cases, the corrected distance vision was 6/9 or better. With distance correction, 80% of multifocal cases had near vision of N9 or better against 10% of monofocal cases. The mean addition required for near vision N6 was +0.8 diopters (D) and +2.6 D in the multifocal and monofocal groups, respectively. Multifocal cases showed significantly decreased contrast sensitivity and increased depth of focus.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nMultifocal IOLs are a good option for those with nonexacting visual requirements. The loss in contrast sensitivity seems to be an acceptable trade-off for satisfactory unaided near vision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"298-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A clinical evaluation of an aspheric multifocal intraocular lens and its implications for the developing world.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the clinical performance of a new aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare the results with a corresponding monofocal IOL.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Two groups of 20 patients each were implanted with a multifocal and monofocal IOL and prospectively studied. Distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, depth of focus, and quality of vision were assessed in both groups.
RESULTS
In 85% of multifocal cases and 100% of monofocal cases, the corrected distance vision was 6/9 or better. With distance correction, 80% of multifocal cases had near vision of N9 or better against 10% of monofocal cases. The mean addition required for near vision N6 was +0.8 diopters (D) and +2.6 D in the multifocal and monofocal groups, respectively. Multifocal cases showed significantly decreased contrast sensitivity and increased depth of focus.
CONCLUSIONS
Multifocal IOLs are a good option for those with nonexacting visual requirements. The loss in contrast sensitivity seems to be an acceptable trade-off for satisfactory unaided near vision.