肺移植的生存分析:一种新的“SELeCT”评分的简单诊断测试用作预后工具。单中心队列研究结果

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Minerva Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9
F. Patrucco, C. Albera, E. Clivati, M. Boffini, M. Rinaldi, C. Costa, R. Cavallo, P. Solidoro
{"title":"肺移植的生存分析:一种新的“SELeCT”评分的简单诊断测试用作预后工具。单中心队列研究结果","authors":"F. Patrucco, C. Albera, E. Clivati, M. Boffini, M. Rinaldi, C. Costa, R. Cavallo, P. Solidoro","doi":"10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BacKGroUNd: there are few validated scores evaluating outcomes of lung transplanted patients based on donor or recipient characteristic before or at the time of transplantation. MetHods: in our study we evaluated a new, and easy to use, 5-item score on survival of patients who underwent lung transplantation. It was called SELeCT Score and was based on clinical, laboratoristic and radiological findings recorded at each observation. resULts: We found higher scores in case of unscheduled observations and an inverse correlation with overall survival rate, even excluding patients who died within 60 days. We identified a threshold of 2 points as significant to predict patients’ survival. Fungal and bacterial infections show scores higher than acute rejections and cMV and other viral infections. coNcLUsioNs: seLect score could represent a useful prognostic tool in guiding clinical choices, demonstrating that more compromised patients (routinely evaluated with clinic, laboratory test and radiological images) had a worse outcome, and that it could be important at least as much as","PeriodicalId":29817,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of survival in lung transplantation: simple diagnostic tests in a new \\\"SELeCT\\\" Score used as prognostic tool. Results from a single center cohort study\",\"authors\":\"F. Patrucco, C. Albera, E. Clivati, M. Boffini, M. Rinaldi, C. Costa, R. Cavallo, P. Solidoro\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BacKGroUNd: there are few validated scores evaluating outcomes of lung transplanted patients based on donor or recipient characteristic before or at the time of transplantation. MetHods: in our study we evaluated a new, and easy to use, 5-item score on survival of patients who underwent lung transplantation. It was called SELeCT Score and was based on clinical, laboratoristic and radiological findings recorded at each observation. resULts: We found higher scores in case of unscheduled observations and an inverse correlation with overall survival rate, even excluding patients who died within 60 days. We identified a threshold of 2 points as significant to predict patients’ survival. Fungal and bacterial infections show scores higher than acute rejections and cMV and other viral infections. coNcLUsioNs: seLect score could represent a useful prognostic tool in guiding clinical choices, demonstrating that more compromised patients (routinely evaluated with clinic, laboratory test and radiological images) had a worse outcome, and that it could be important at least as much as\",\"PeriodicalId\":29817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2784-8477.21.01985-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前很少有基于供体或受体在移植前或移植时的特征来评估肺移植患者预后的有效评分。方法:在我们的研究中,我们评估了一种新的、易于使用的5项肺移植患者生存评分。它被称为SELeCT评分,是基于每次观察时记录的临床、实验室和放射学结果。结果:我们发现,即使排除60天内死亡的患者,非计划观察的得分更高,与总生存率呈负相关。我们确定了2点的阈值对预测患者的生存具有重要意义。真菌和细菌感染的得分高于急性排斥反应、巨细胞病毒和其他病毒感染。结论:seLect评分可以作为指导临床选择的一个有用的预后工具,表明更多的受损患者(通过临床、实验室检查和放射图像进行常规评估)的预后更差,并且它的重要性至少与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of survival in lung transplantation: simple diagnostic tests in a new "SELeCT" Score used as prognostic tool. Results from a single center cohort study
BacKGroUNd: there are few validated scores evaluating outcomes of lung transplanted patients based on donor or recipient characteristic before or at the time of transplantation. MetHods: in our study we evaluated a new, and easy to use, 5-item score on survival of patients who underwent lung transplantation. It was called SELeCT Score and was based on clinical, laboratoristic and radiological findings recorded at each observation. resULts: We found higher scores in case of unscheduled observations and an inverse correlation with overall survival rate, even excluding patients who died within 60 days. We identified a threshold of 2 points as significant to predict patients’ survival. Fungal and bacterial infections show scores higher than acute rejections and cMV and other viral infections. coNcLUsioNs: seLect score could represent a useful prognostic tool in guiding clinical choices, demonstrating that more compromised patients (routinely evaluated with clinic, laboratory test and radiological images) had a worse outcome, and that it could be important at least as much as
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Respiratory Medicine
Minerva Respiratory Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Exogenous lipoid pneumonia secondary to repetitive micro-aspiration of paraffin oils laxatives Breathing new life into asthma research: a review of machine learning and multi-omics approaches Enhancing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management: long-term noninvasive ventilation, ventilation, holistic treatment, monitoring, and artificial intelligence integration Smoking effects on the pulmonary functions and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients: potential value of anticyclic citrullinated peptide assessed in bronchoalveolar lavage High-intensity non-invasive ventilation: a brief review and update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1