超越学科范围和顺序:考虑学生认知

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 BIOLOGY American Biology Teacher Pub Date : 2010-09-01 DOI:10.1525/ABT.2010.72.7.2
R. Duncan, Aaron D. Rogat
{"title":"超越学科范围和顺序:考虑学生认知","authors":"R. Duncan, Aaron D. Rogat","doi":"10.1525/ABT.2010.72.7.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following is a comment on a recent editorial on reforming genetics education by Michael Dougherty (2010). Dougherty properly pointed out some of the challenges of teaching genetics and the conceptual obstacles students face in this domain. We agree that students harbor many misconceptions about genetics and tend to think deterministically about genetic phenomena. Given that most genetic phenomena are complex, involve multiple genes, and are influenced by environmental factors, students' understanding of genetics is often inadequate. We also agree that the current scope and sequence of the genetics curriculum has failed to deepen students' understanding.\n\nHowever, Dougherty's suggestion to invert the genetics curriculum, such that students first learn about continuous or complex traits and then …","PeriodicalId":50960,"journal":{"name":"American Biology Teacher","volume":"11 1","pages":"405-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Disciplinary-Based Scope & Sequence: Taking Student Cognition into Account\",\"authors\":\"R. Duncan, Aaron D. Rogat\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/ABT.2010.72.7.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following is a comment on a recent editorial on reforming genetics education by Michael Dougherty (2010). Dougherty properly pointed out some of the challenges of teaching genetics and the conceptual obstacles students face in this domain. We agree that students harbor many misconceptions about genetics and tend to think deterministically about genetic phenomena. Given that most genetic phenomena are complex, involve multiple genes, and are influenced by environmental factors, students' understanding of genetics is often inadequate. We also agree that the current scope and sequence of the genetics curriculum has failed to deepen students' understanding.\\n\\nHowever, Dougherty's suggestion to invert the genetics curriculum, such that students first learn about continuous or complex traits and then …\",\"PeriodicalId\":50960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Biology Teacher\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"405-405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Biology Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/ABT.2010.72.7.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Biology Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/ABT.2010.72.7.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以下是对Michael Dougherty(2010)最近一篇关于改革遗传学教育的社论的评论。多尔蒂恰当地指出了遗传学教学的一些挑战,以及学生在这一领域面临的概念障碍。我们同意学生对遗传学有许多误解,并且倾向于对遗传现象进行决定论的思考。由于大多数遗传现象是复杂的,涉及多个基因,并受环境因素的影响,学生对遗传学的认识往往不足。我们也同意目前遗传学课程的范围和顺序未能加深学生的理解。然而,多尔蒂建议将遗传学课程倒置,让学生首先学习连续或复杂的特征,然后……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond Disciplinary-Based Scope & Sequence: Taking Student Cognition into Account
The following is a comment on a recent editorial on reforming genetics education by Michael Dougherty (2010). Dougherty properly pointed out some of the challenges of teaching genetics and the conceptual obstacles students face in this domain. We agree that students harbor many misconceptions about genetics and tend to think deterministically about genetic phenomena. Given that most genetic phenomena are complex, involve multiple genes, and are influenced by environmental factors, students' understanding of genetics is often inadequate. We also agree that the current scope and sequence of the genetics curriculum has failed to deepen students' understanding. However, Dougherty's suggestion to invert the genetics curriculum, such that students first learn about continuous or complex traits and then …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Biology Teacher
American Biology Teacher BIOLOGY-EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: The American Biology Teacher is an award winning and peer-refereed professional journal for K-16 biology teachers. Articles include topics such as modern biology content, biology teaching strategies for both the classroom and laboratory, field activities, and a wide range of assistance for application and professional development. Each issue features reviews of books, classroom technology products, and "Biology Today." Published 9 times a year, the journal also covers the social and ethical implications of biology and ways to incorporate such concerns into instructional programs.
期刊最新文献
A Class Project for Investigating Possible Future Local Effects of Global Climate Change through Student Analysis of Fossil Faunas Simplifying Biology Vocabulary via Morphology Planning to Stay: Burnout, Demoralization, Exploitation, and How to Reclaim Self-Care, Your Classroom, and Your Life … Anyway; Breaking the Mold: Changing the Face of Climate Science and Roar like a Lion: How Animals Can Help You Be Your Best Self The Alpha Female Wolf The “Moonshot” American Science Instruction Really Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1