库恩与当代现实主义/反现实主义之争

K. B. Wray
{"title":"库恩与当代现实主义/反现实主义之争","authors":"K. B. Wray","doi":"10.1086/712945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Kuhn was never a key player in the contemporary realism/antirealism debates, the debates that gained momentum around 1980 or so, with the publication of Bas van Fraassen’s The Scientific Image and Larry Laudan’s “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” But I argue that Kuhn had a significant influence on these debates. Kuhn played a significant role in focusing philosophers’ attention on a different issue than the realism/antirealism debates of the 1950s and 1960s. Instead of focusing on the meaning of theoretical terms, philosophers of science turned their attention to the problems raised by changes of theory. The particular shape of the contemporary debates thus owes something to the publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.","PeriodicalId":42878,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"91 1","pages":"72 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kuhn and the Contemporary Realism/Antirealism Debates\",\"authors\":\"K. B. Wray\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/712945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Kuhn was never a key player in the contemporary realism/antirealism debates, the debates that gained momentum around 1980 or so, with the publication of Bas van Fraassen’s The Scientific Image and Larry Laudan’s “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” But I argue that Kuhn had a significant influence on these debates. Kuhn played a significant role in focusing philosophers’ attention on a different issue than the realism/antirealism debates of the 1950s and 1960s. Instead of focusing on the meaning of theoretical terms, philosophers of science turned their attention to the problems raised by changes of theory. The particular shape of the contemporary debates thus owes something to the publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/712945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

托马斯·库恩从来都不是当代现实主义/反现实主义辩论中的关键人物,这场辩论在1980年左右随着巴斯·范·弗拉森的《科学图像》和拉里·劳丹的《收敛现实主义的争论》的出版而变得激烈起来。但我认为库恩对这些争论有重大影响。库恩发挥了重要作用,将哲学家的注意力集中在一个不同的问题上,而不是20世纪50年代和60年代的现实主义/反现实主义辩论。科学哲学家不再关注理论术语的意义,而是把注意力转向理论变化所带来的问题。因此,当代辩论的特殊形式在某种程度上要归功于《科学革命的结构》一书的出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kuhn and the Contemporary Realism/Antirealism Debates
Thomas Kuhn was never a key player in the contemporary realism/antirealism debates, the debates that gained momentum around 1980 or so, with the publication of Bas van Fraassen’s The Scientific Image and Larry Laudan’s “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” But I argue that Kuhn had a significant influence on these debates. Kuhn played a significant role in focusing philosophers’ attention on a different issue than the realism/antirealism debates of the 1950s and 1960s. Instead of focusing on the meaning of theoretical terms, philosophers of science turned their attention to the problems raised by changes of theory. The particular shape of the contemporary debates thus owes something to the publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Conceptual Analysis and the Analytic Method in Kant’s Prize Essay Johann Nikolaus Tetens (1736-1807) and the Idea of Phoneme. A Chapter in the History of Linguistic Thought What Conceptual Engineering Can Learn From The History of Philosophy of Science: Healthy Externalism and Metasemantic Plasticity Sellars, Analyticity, and a Dynamic Picture of Language Special Section Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1