{"title":"“人类学对法律重要吗?””","authors":"J. Comaroff","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does anthropology matter to law? As phrased, this provocation, worthy\nof address though it certainly is, may ultimately be unanswerable.\nThe reason? Because, like all questions of this sort, it harbours others\nwithin it. Precisely which ‘anthropology’? ‘Law’ as what? As everyday\npractice, as theorised praxis, as pedagogy, as politics by other means?\nWhat, moreover, counts as mattering? And from where, in particular,\nis the provocation being posed? All these questions, patently, make\na difference.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"3478 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Does Anthropology Matter to Law?’\",\"authors\":\"J. Comaroff\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does anthropology matter to law? As phrased, this provocation, worthy\\nof address though it certainly is, may ultimately be unanswerable.\\nThe reason? Because, like all questions of this sort, it harbours others\\nwithin it. Precisely which ‘anthropology’? ‘Law’ as what? As everyday\\npractice, as theorised praxis, as pedagogy, as politics by other means?\\nWhat, moreover, counts as mattering? And from where, in particular,\\nis the provocation being posed? All these questions, patently, make\\na difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"3478 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does anthropology matter to law? As phrased, this provocation, worthy
of address though it certainly is, may ultimately be unanswerable.
The reason? Because, like all questions of this sort, it harbours others
within it. Precisely which ‘anthropology’? ‘Law’ as what? As everyday
practice, as theorised praxis, as pedagogy, as politics by other means?
What, moreover, counts as mattering? And from where, in particular,
is the provocation being posed? All these questions, patently, make
a difference.