弗基耶和卡尔佩珀县菲尔普斯野生动物管理区双线蝾螈的栖息地检测模型

J. D. McGhee, Michael D. Killian
{"title":"弗基耶和卡尔佩珀县菲尔普斯野生动物管理区双线蝾螈的栖息地检测模型","authors":"J. D. McGhee, Michael D. Killian","doi":"10.25778/9s42-h193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aquatic salamanders represent an important component of Virginia river watersheds, but despite potential declines, few specifics are known about their habitat preferences. We surveyed the habitats of the northern two-lined salamander and collected data on an array of habitat variables associated with the species. We used a logistic regression analysis to develop a model predicting its presence or absence for a given 50m-transect. Our final model incorporated the variation in stream depth and direction of stream flow and accounted for 25% of the variation in our data. We conclude that stream depth variation is an important feature of salamander habitat ecology, and surmise that direction of flow is of site-specific importance possibly related to stream order. Both features may be behavioral adaptations to avoid fish predation. INTRODUCTION Stream-dwelling salamanders are an important component of aquatic ecosystems. They account for a significant proportion of the biomass of a stream ecosystem, and act as a key trophic link, important as both predators and prey (Spight 1967, Burton and Likens 1975, Rocco and Brooks 2000). Consequently, these salamanders have potential to act as an indicator of stream health (Rocco and Brooks 2000, Barr and Babbitt 2002). This is particularly true for headwater streams were salamanders may act as the dominant vertebrate predator (Davic and Welsh 2004). Accordingly, it would be beneficial to better understand how these species make use of their available habitat. This is especially important in the face of on-going amphibian declines (Alford and Richards 1999). Knowledge of this type may provide better insights into the conservation of these species and their associated ecosystems (Cushman 2005). Previous surveys of stream and terrestrial amphibian diversity have been carried out in the Rappahannock River watershed of northern Virginia; however, more needs to be done to quantify the habitat preferences of important stream species (Mitchell 1998, McGhee and Killian 2010). To begin addressing this need, we conducted a preliminary study of salamander habitat at C.F. Phelps Wildlife Management Area (WMA) located in the Rappahannock River watershed and developed a simple habitat model for the Virginia Journal of Science Volume 61 Number 4 Winter 2010 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: jaymcghee@rmc.edu Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol61/iss4 152 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE northern two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata), a common stream species for the area (McGhee and Killian 2010). Northern two-lined salamanders are common to northern Virginia forest streams within the Rappahannock River watershed (Mitchell and Reay 1999). While they are considered potentially important components of the local ecosystems in which they occur, few studies have developed predictive models of habitat use (Davic and Welsh 2004). They occupy stream margins and seeps, using submerged rocks and woody debris for cover; but may periodically be found in upland terrestrial sites (Petranka 1998). Females attach eggs beneath submerged rocks of varying surface area in headwater streams (Jakubanis et al. 2008). Larvae of this species are benthic predators associated with stream pools with low silt (Smith and Grossman 2003, Petranka 1998). Two-lined salamanders are able to access low-order streams typically inaccessible to predatory fishes, and have become adapted to these headwater stream environments (Vannote et al. 1980, Davic and Welsh 2004). We hypothesized that two-lined salamanders would be detected in or near cool narrow, shallow streams. From this hypothesis, we predicted that important habitat variables in a logistic regression model would be stream temperature, stream depth, and stream width. METHODS We chose sampling sites by randomly selecting a GPS starting location constrained to occur within C. F. Phelps WMA, and moving from that point to the nearest stream. We then moved upstream or downstream a randomly selected distance of up to 50m, and laid a 50m transect running downstream. We sampled stream transects by searching five 1-m quadrats placed within each of the five 10-m sections of the 2 transect. The particular location of the quadrat within these 10-m sections was randomly selected (Jaeger 1994, Jaeger and Inger 1994). We searched quadrats by looking under larger cover objects such as rocks or decaying logs, leaf pack, leaf litter, and using a standard-mesh aquarium dip net (1/16 inch mesh size) to sample stream bottoms (Mitchell 2000). We identified captured salamanders to species (Petranka 1998). Data were collected at both transect and quadrat levels (Table 1). We used logistic regression to select models with those predictive variables most associated with salamander captures at the transect level. Variables measured at the quadrat level were averaged and averages and standard deviations were used as separate predictor variables. As synergistic effects may occur between the variables we measured, we created a priori multiplicative variables for testing as well (Table 1). We used forward stepwise selection (P = 0.05 to enter and 0.10 to remove) in SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). We assessed variable coefficients using the change in -2 loglikelihood and evaluated the explanatory value of models using Nagelkerke’s r (Ryan 1997, Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989, Nagelkerke 1991). For all statistical","PeriodicalId":23516,"journal":{"name":"Virginia journal of science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Habitat Model for the Detection of Two-lined Salamanders at C. F. Phelps Wildlife Management Area, Fauquier and Culpeper Counties, Virginia\",\"authors\":\"J. D. McGhee, Michael D. Killian\",\"doi\":\"10.25778/9s42-h193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aquatic salamanders represent an important component of Virginia river watersheds, but despite potential declines, few specifics are known about their habitat preferences. We surveyed the habitats of the northern two-lined salamander and collected data on an array of habitat variables associated with the species. We used a logistic regression analysis to develop a model predicting its presence or absence for a given 50m-transect. Our final model incorporated the variation in stream depth and direction of stream flow and accounted for 25% of the variation in our data. We conclude that stream depth variation is an important feature of salamander habitat ecology, and surmise that direction of flow is of site-specific importance possibly related to stream order. Both features may be behavioral adaptations to avoid fish predation. INTRODUCTION Stream-dwelling salamanders are an important component of aquatic ecosystems. They account for a significant proportion of the biomass of a stream ecosystem, and act as a key trophic link, important as both predators and prey (Spight 1967, Burton and Likens 1975, Rocco and Brooks 2000). Consequently, these salamanders have potential to act as an indicator of stream health (Rocco and Brooks 2000, Barr and Babbitt 2002). This is particularly true for headwater streams were salamanders may act as the dominant vertebrate predator (Davic and Welsh 2004). Accordingly, it would be beneficial to better understand how these species make use of their available habitat. This is especially important in the face of on-going amphibian declines (Alford and Richards 1999). Knowledge of this type may provide better insights into the conservation of these species and their associated ecosystems (Cushman 2005). Previous surveys of stream and terrestrial amphibian diversity have been carried out in the Rappahannock River watershed of northern Virginia; however, more needs to be done to quantify the habitat preferences of important stream species (Mitchell 1998, McGhee and Killian 2010). To begin addressing this need, we conducted a preliminary study of salamander habitat at C.F. Phelps Wildlife Management Area (WMA) located in the Rappahannock River watershed and developed a simple habitat model for the Virginia Journal of Science Volume 61 Number 4 Winter 2010 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: jaymcghee@rmc.edu Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol61/iss4 152 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE northern two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata), a common stream species for the area (McGhee and Killian 2010). Northern two-lined salamanders are common to northern Virginia forest streams within the Rappahannock River watershed (Mitchell and Reay 1999). While they are considered potentially important components of the local ecosystems in which they occur, few studies have developed predictive models of habitat use (Davic and Welsh 2004). They occupy stream margins and seeps, using submerged rocks and woody debris for cover; but may periodically be found in upland terrestrial sites (Petranka 1998). Females attach eggs beneath submerged rocks of varying surface area in headwater streams (Jakubanis et al. 2008). Larvae of this species are benthic predators associated with stream pools with low silt (Smith and Grossman 2003, Petranka 1998). Two-lined salamanders are able to access low-order streams typically inaccessible to predatory fishes, and have become adapted to these headwater stream environments (Vannote et al. 1980, Davic and Welsh 2004). We hypothesized that two-lined salamanders would be detected in or near cool narrow, shallow streams. From this hypothesis, we predicted that important habitat variables in a logistic regression model would be stream temperature, stream depth, and stream width. METHODS We chose sampling sites by randomly selecting a GPS starting location constrained to occur within C. F. Phelps WMA, and moving from that point to the nearest stream. We then moved upstream or downstream a randomly selected distance of up to 50m, and laid a 50m transect running downstream. We sampled stream transects by searching five 1-m quadrats placed within each of the five 10-m sections of the 2 transect. The particular location of the quadrat within these 10-m sections was randomly selected (Jaeger 1994, Jaeger and Inger 1994). We searched quadrats by looking under larger cover objects such as rocks or decaying logs, leaf pack, leaf litter, and using a standard-mesh aquarium dip net (1/16 inch mesh size) to sample stream bottoms (Mitchell 2000). We identified captured salamanders to species (Petranka 1998). Data were collected at both transect and quadrat levels (Table 1). We used logistic regression to select models with those predictive variables most associated with salamander captures at the transect level. Variables measured at the quadrat level were averaged and averages and standard deviations were used as separate predictor variables. As synergistic effects may occur between the variables we measured, we created a priori multiplicative variables for testing as well (Table 1). We used forward stepwise selection (P = 0.05 to enter and 0.10 to remove) in SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). We assessed variable coefficients using the change in -2 loglikelihood and evaluated the explanatory value of models using Nagelkerke’s r (Ryan 1997, Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989, Nagelkerke 1991). For all statistical\",\"PeriodicalId\":23516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25778/9s42-h193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia journal of science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25778/9s42-h193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水生蝾螈是弗吉尼亚河流域的重要组成部分,尽管它们的数量可能会下降,但人们对它们的栖息地偏好知之甚少。我们调查了北双线蝾螈的栖息地,并收集了与该物种相关的一系列栖息地变量的数据。我们使用逻辑回归分析来开发一个模型,预测给定的50米样带的存在或不存在。我们的最终模型包含了河流深度和水流方向的变化,占我们数据变化的25%。我们认为河流深度变化是蝾螈栖息地生态的一个重要特征,并推测水流方向可能与河流顺序有关。这两种特征都可能是为了躲避鱼类捕食而做出的行为适应。水栖蝾螈是水生生态系统的重要组成部分。它们占溪流生态系统生物量的很大比例,是一个关键的营养环节,既是捕食者也是猎物(Spight 1967, Burton and Likens 1975, Rocco and Brooks 2000)。因此,这些蝾螈有可能作为河流健康状况的指标(Rocco and Brooks 2000, Barr and Babbitt 2002)。对于源头溪流来说尤其如此,因为蝾螈可能是主要的脊椎动物捕食者(Davic and Welsh 2004)。因此,更好地了解这些物种如何利用它们现有的栖息地将是有益的。在两栖动物数量持续减少的情况下,这一点尤为重要(Alford and Richards 1999)。这种类型的知识可以更好地了解这些物种及其相关生态系统的保护(Cushman 2005)。以前对河流和陆地两栖动物多样性的调查已经在弗吉尼亚州北部的拉帕汉诺克河流域进行了;然而,需要做更多的工作来量化重要河流物种的栖息地偏好(Mitchell 1998, McGhee和Killian 2010)。为了开始解决这一需求,我们对位于Rappahannock河流域的C.F. Phelps野生动物管理区(WMA)的蝾螈栖息地进行了初步研究,并开发了一个简单的栖息地模型,发表在《弗吉尼亚科学杂志》2010年冬季第61卷第4期。E-mail: jaymcghee@rmc.edu Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol61/iss4 152 Virginia Journal of Science北双线蝾螈(Eurycea bislineata),该地区常见的溪流物种(McGhee and Killian 2010)。北双线蝾螈在拉帕汉诺克河流域的北弗吉尼亚森林溪流中很常见(Mitchell和Reay 1999)。虽然它们被认为是当地生态系统的潜在重要组成部分,但很少有研究开发了栖息地利用的预测模型(Davic和Welsh, 2004年)。它们占据溪流边缘和渗漏处,利用水下岩石和木质碎屑作为掩护;但可能周期性地在陆地高地发现(Petranka 1998)。雌性在源头溪流中不同表面积的水下岩石下产卵(Jakubanis et al. 2008)。该物种的幼虫是底栖捕食者,与低淤泥的溪流池有关(Smith and Grossman 2003, Petranka 1998)。双线蝾螈能够进入通常食肉鱼类无法进入的低阶溪流,并且已经适应了这些上游溪流环境(Vannote et al. 1980, Davic and Welsh 2004)。我们假设,在凉爽、狭窄、浅的溪流中或附近会发现双线蝾螈。根据这一假设,我们预测在logistic回归模型中重要的生境变量是河流温度、河流深度和河流宽度。我们通过随机选择一个GPS起始位置来选择采样点,该位置限制在c.f. Phelps WMA范围内,并从该点移动到最近的溪流。然后我们在上游或下游随机选择50米的距离,并在下游铺设50米的样条。我们通过搜索放置在2个样带的5个10米剖面内的5个1米样方来采样溪流样带。在这些10米区间内随机选择样方的特定位置(Jaeger 1994, Jaeger and Inger 1994)。我们通过寻找较大的覆盖物(如岩石或腐烂的原木,叶包,凋落叶)来搜索样方,并使用标准网目水族馆浸水网(1/16英寸网目大小)来取样溪流底部(Mitchell 2000)。我们将捕获的蝾螈分为两种(Petranka 1998)。在样带和样方水平上收集数据(表1)。我们使用逻辑回归选择与样带水平上捕获的蝾螈最相关的预测变量的模型。在样方水平上测量的变量取平均值,并用平均值和标准差作为单独的预测变量。 由于我们测量的变量之间可能发生协同效应,我们也创建了一个先验的乘法变量来进行测试(表1)。我们在SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL)中使用前向逐步选择(P = 0.05进入,0.10删除)。我们使用-2对数似然的变化来评估变量系数,并使用Nagelkerke的r来评估模型的解释价值(Ryan 1997, Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989, Nagelkerke 1991)。对于所有统计数据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Habitat Model for the Detection of Two-lined Salamanders at C. F. Phelps Wildlife Management Area, Fauquier and Culpeper Counties, Virginia
Aquatic salamanders represent an important component of Virginia river watersheds, but despite potential declines, few specifics are known about their habitat preferences. We surveyed the habitats of the northern two-lined salamander and collected data on an array of habitat variables associated with the species. We used a logistic regression analysis to develop a model predicting its presence or absence for a given 50m-transect. Our final model incorporated the variation in stream depth and direction of stream flow and accounted for 25% of the variation in our data. We conclude that stream depth variation is an important feature of salamander habitat ecology, and surmise that direction of flow is of site-specific importance possibly related to stream order. Both features may be behavioral adaptations to avoid fish predation. INTRODUCTION Stream-dwelling salamanders are an important component of aquatic ecosystems. They account for a significant proportion of the biomass of a stream ecosystem, and act as a key trophic link, important as both predators and prey (Spight 1967, Burton and Likens 1975, Rocco and Brooks 2000). Consequently, these salamanders have potential to act as an indicator of stream health (Rocco and Brooks 2000, Barr and Babbitt 2002). This is particularly true for headwater streams were salamanders may act as the dominant vertebrate predator (Davic and Welsh 2004). Accordingly, it would be beneficial to better understand how these species make use of their available habitat. This is especially important in the face of on-going amphibian declines (Alford and Richards 1999). Knowledge of this type may provide better insights into the conservation of these species and their associated ecosystems (Cushman 2005). Previous surveys of stream and terrestrial amphibian diversity have been carried out in the Rappahannock River watershed of northern Virginia; however, more needs to be done to quantify the habitat preferences of important stream species (Mitchell 1998, McGhee and Killian 2010). To begin addressing this need, we conducted a preliminary study of salamander habitat at C.F. Phelps Wildlife Management Area (WMA) located in the Rappahannock River watershed and developed a simple habitat model for the Virginia Journal of Science Volume 61 Number 4 Winter 2010 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: jaymcghee@rmc.edu Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2010 http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol61/iss4 152 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE northern two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata), a common stream species for the area (McGhee and Killian 2010). Northern two-lined salamanders are common to northern Virginia forest streams within the Rappahannock River watershed (Mitchell and Reay 1999). While they are considered potentially important components of the local ecosystems in which they occur, few studies have developed predictive models of habitat use (Davic and Welsh 2004). They occupy stream margins and seeps, using submerged rocks and woody debris for cover; but may periodically be found in upland terrestrial sites (Petranka 1998). Females attach eggs beneath submerged rocks of varying surface area in headwater streams (Jakubanis et al. 2008). Larvae of this species are benthic predators associated with stream pools with low silt (Smith and Grossman 2003, Petranka 1998). Two-lined salamanders are able to access low-order streams typically inaccessible to predatory fishes, and have become adapted to these headwater stream environments (Vannote et al. 1980, Davic and Welsh 2004). We hypothesized that two-lined salamanders would be detected in or near cool narrow, shallow streams. From this hypothesis, we predicted that important habitat variables in a logistic regression model would be stream temperature, stream depth, and stream width. METHODS We chose sampling sites by randomly selecting a GPS starting location constrained to occur within C. F. Phelps WMA, and moving from that point to the nearest stream. We then moved upstream or downstream a randomly selected distance of up to 50m, and laid a 50m transect running downstream. We sampled stream transects by searching five 1-m quadrats placed within each of the five 10-m sections of the 2 transect. The particular location of the quadrat within these 10-m sections was randomly selected (Jaeger 1994, Jaeger and Inger 1994). We searched quadrats by looking under larger cover objects such as rocks or decaying logs, leaf pack, leaf litter, and using a standard-mesh aquarium dip net (1/16 inch mesh size) to sample stream bottoms (Mitchell 2000). We identified captured salamanders to species (Petranka 1998). Data were collected at both transect and quadrat levels (Table 1). We used logistic regression to select models with those predictive variables most associated with salamander captures at the transect level. Variables measured at the quadrat level were averaged and averages and standard deviations were used as separate predictor variables. As synergistic effects may occur between the variables we measured, we created a priori multiplicative variables for testing as well (Table 1). We used forward stepwise selection (P = 0.05 to enter and 0.10 to remove) in SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). We assessed variable coefficients using the change in -2 loglikelihood and evaluated the explanatory value of models using Nagelkerke’s r (Ryan 1997, Hosmer and Lemeshow 1989, Nagelkerke 1991). For all statistical
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Habitat Partitioning and Associated Morphological Differences Among Three Species of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) in the South Fork Roanoke River, Virginia Estimated 2020 CO2 Emission Reductions in Virginia’s Transportation Sector from COVID-19 Identification of Planktothrix (Cyanobacteria) Blooms and Effects on the Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community in the Non-Tidal Potomac River, USA A Survey on Securing Personally Identifiable Information on Smartphones Central Administration of Agouti-Related Peptide Increases Food Intake in Japanese Quail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1