斯图尔特·m·胡佛和柯蒂斯·d·科茨,《上帝造人吗?》媒体、宗教和男子气概的危机

IF 1.9 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Communication Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.194593
E. Bloomfield
{"title":"斯图尔特·m·胡佛和柯蒂斯·d·科茨,《上帝造人吗?》媒体、宗教和男子气概的危机","authors":"E. Bloomfield","doi":"10.5860/choice.194593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book follows in the footsteps of Hoover's path-breaking work in the study of media and religion via critical cultural studies. The research analyzed by Hoover and Coats comes from a series of media audience studies conducted by the Center for Media, Religion, and Culture at the University of Colorado. The authors ask the following question: what exactly is the role of religion and media in U.S. Christian men's understandings of their identities and social roles? The authors investigate self-identified Christian, white, middle-class, heterosexual, married men's ideas about masculinity, using interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Explanations for the current so-called \"crisis of masculinity\" come in a variety of forms and from a range of political positions, from those who fear that the social and economic gains of women translate to equivalent losses for men, to those who blame media for its representations of \"toxic\" masculinities (p. 10), from television's \"dumb dads\" (p. 94) to its casual philanderers. For \"neo-traditional\" Christian leader Don Eberly, the solution to this so-called \"crisis\" is for America to reinvest in traditional patriarchal masculinity, turning men into strong fathers (p. 9).These strong fathers will in turn create strong families who will go on to act in the public sphere, investing in civic service and establishing a moral society, or so the story goes. Given the relatively coherent discourses of masculinity in American Evangelical Christianity, exemplified by Eberly, the authors initially sought to measure just how well Evangelical men understood and lived a religiously-directed masculine ideal. The assumption 386","PeriodicalId":51388,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication","volume":"14 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stewart M. Hoover and Curtis D. Coats, Does God Make the Man? Media, Religion, and the Crisis of Masculinity\",\"authors\":\"E. Bloomfield\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.194593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book follows in the footsteps of Hoover's path-breaking work in the study of media and religion via critical cultural studies. The research analyzed by Hoover and Coats comes from a series of media audience studies conducted by the Center for Media, Religion, and Culture at the University of Colorado. The authors ask the following question: what exactly is the role of religion and media in U.S. Christian men's understandings of their identities and social roles? The authors investigate self-identified Christian, white, middle-class, heterosexual, married men's ideas about masculinity, using interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Explanations for the current so-called \\\"crisis of masculinity\\\" come in a variety of forms and from a range of political positions, from those who fear that the social and economic gains of women translate to equivalent losses for men, to those who blame media for its representations of \\\"toxic\\\" masculinities (p. 10), from television's \\\"dumb dads\\\" (p. 94) to its casual philanderers. For \\\"neo-traditional\\\" Christian leader Don Eberly, the solution to this so-called \\\"crisis\\\" is for America to reinvest in traditional patriarchal masculinity, turning men into strong fathers (p. 9).These strong fathers will in turn create strong families who will go on to act in the public sphere, investing in civic service and establishing a moral society, or so the story goes. Given the relatively coherent discourses of masculinity in American Evangelical Christianity, exemplified by Eberly, the authors initially sought to measure just how well Evangelical men understood and lived a religiously-directed masculine ideal. The assumption 386\",\"PeriodicalId\":51388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.194593\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.194593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这本书遵循了胡佛通过批判性文化研究来研究媒体和宗教的开创性工作的脚步。胡佛和科茨分析的研究来自科罗拉多大学媒体、宗教和文化中心进行的一系列媒体受众研究。作者提出了以下问题:宗教和媒体在美国基督徒男性对其身份和社会角色的理解中究竟扮演了什么角色?作者调查了自认为是基督徒、白人、中产阶级、异性恋和已婚男性对男子气概的看法,采用了访谈、焦点小组讨论和参与者观察的方式。对于当前所谓的“男子气概危机”,有各种各样的解释,来自不同的政治立场,有人担心女性的社会和经济收益会转化为男性的同等损失,有人指责媒体对“有毒”男子气概的表现(第10页),有人指责电视上的“愚蠢爸爸”(第94页),有人指责电视上的花花公子。对于“新传统”基督教领袖唐·埃伯利来说,解决这种所谓“危机”的办法是美国重新投资传统的父权男子气概,把男人变成强有力的父亲(第9页)。这些强有力的父亲反过来又会创造出强大的家庭,这些家庭将继续在公共领域发挥作用,投资于公民服务,建立一个道德社会,或者故事是这样发展的。考虑到以埃伯利为代表的美国福音派基督教中相对连贯的男性话语,作者最初试图衡量福音派男性对宗教指导的男性理想的理解和生活程度。假设386
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stewart M. Hoover and Curtis D. Coats, Does God Make the Man? Media, Religion, and the Crisis of Masculinity
This book follows in the footsteps of Hoover's path-breaking work in the study of media and religion via critical cultural studies. The research analyzed by Hoover and Coats comes from a series of media audience studies conducted by the Center for Media, Religion, and Culture at the University of Colorado. The authors ask the following question: what exactly is the role of religion and media in U.S. Christian men's understandings of their identities and social roles? The authors investigate self-identified Christian, white, middle-class, heterosexual, married men's ideas about masculinity, using interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Explanations for the current so-called "crisis of masculinity" come in a variety of forms and from a range of political positions, from those who fear that the social and economic gains of women translate to equivalent losses for men, to those who blame media for its representations of "toxic" masculinities (p. 10), from television's "dumb dads" (p. 94) to its casual philanderers. For "neo-traditional" Christian leader Don Eberly, the solution to this so-called "crisis" is for America to reinvest in traditional patriarchal masculinity, turning men into strong fathers (p. 9).These strong fathers will in turn create strong families who will go on to act in the public sphere, investing in civic service and establishing a moral society, or so the story goes. Given the relatively coherent discourses of masculinity in American Evangelical Christianity, exemplified by Eberly, the authors initially sought to measure just how well Evangelical men understood and lived a religiously-directed masculine ideal. The assumption 386
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Communication is an online, multi-media, academic journal that adheres to the highest standards of peer review and engages established and emerging scholars from anywhere in the world. The International Journal of Communication is an interdisciplinary journal that, while centered in communication, is open and welcoming to contributions from the many disciplines and approaches that meet at the crossroads that is communication study. We are interested in scholarship that crosses disciplinary lines and speaks to readers from a range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. In other words, the International Journal of Communication will be a forum for scholars when they address the wider audiences of our many sub-fields and specialties, rather than the location for the narrower conversations more appropriately conducted within more specialized journals. USC Annenberg Press USC Annenberg Press is committed to excellence in communication scholarship, journalism, media research, and application. To advance this goal, we edit and publish prominent scholarly publications that are both innovative and influential, and that chart new courses in their respective fields of study. Annenberg Press is among the first to deliver journal content online free of charge, and devoted to the wide dissemination of its content. Annenberg Press continues to offer scholars and readers a forum that meets the highest standards of peer review and engages established and emerging scholars from anywhere in the world.
期刊最新文献
Media Representations of Academia: Mapping and Typologizing News Coverage of All Swiss Higher Education Institutions Making Sense of Metrics in the Music Industries Discursive Media Institutionalism: Assessing Vivien A. Schmidt’s Framework and Its Value for Media and Communication Studies (Mis)informed During COVID-19: How Education Level and Information Sources Contribute to Knowledge Gaps Research perspectives on TikTok and its legacy apps: introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1