心电测量与超声心动图评价心脏手术患者左心室收缩功能的收缩时间比的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究

Ankita Singh, Minati Choudhury, S. Chauhan, P. Kapoor
{"title":"心电测量与超声心动图评价心脏手术患者左心室收缩功能的收缩时间比的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Ankita Singh, Minati Choudhury, S. Chauhan, P. Kapoor","doi":"10.25259/jccc_21_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nTo identify the correlation between systolic time ratio(STR) measured with electrical cardiometry (EC) device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and echocardiography in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to find a noninvasive technique for estimating left ventricular systolic function during the perioperative period.\n\n\n\nSystolic time ratio data were obtained simultaneously from the electrical cardiometry device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and transthoracic echocardiography at the following predefined timepoints— before anaesthesia induction (T0 baseline), after induction (T1), at the end of the surgery(T2), and after extubation (T3) in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The agreement between the systolic time ratio measured by electrical cardiometry and transthoracic echocardiography was studied using Bland-Altman plots. Paired t-tests were used to compare systolic time ratio measurements at different time points.\n\n\n\nMean STR by EC and Echocardiography at T0 was 0.456 (0.429-0.483) and 0.348 (0.330-.366) at T1 was 0.464 (0.442 -0.486) and 0.372 (0.344-0.401) at T2 was 0.421 (0.402 -0.439) and 0.305 (0.290-0.320) and at T3 was 0.438 (0.419-0.457) and 0.353 (0.336-0.370), P value <0.001. Bland-Altman analysis showed that EC measured STR compared with echocardiography at T0 with a mean bias of 0.108 and (with limits of agreement -0.19 ,0.14) at T1 it was 0.092 (with limits of agreement -0.21,0.40) at T2 it was 0.11 (with limits of agreement -0.04,0.28) and at T3 it was 0.085 (with limits of agreement -0.101 ,0.271).\n\n\n\nIn conclusion, no association between systolic time ratio as measured by electrical cardiometry and echocardiography was found in our study. Our results do not conclusively prohibit using electrical cardiometry in the perioperative period to evaluate LV systolic function. Further work must be done to establish the role of STR as a surrogate marker of LV systolic function.\n","PeriodicalId":34567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Systolic Time Ratio from Electrical Cardiometry Versus Echocardiography for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Ankita Singh, Minati Choudhury, S. Chauhan, P. Kapoor\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/jccc_21_2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nTo identify the correlation between systolic time ratio(STR) measured with electrical cardiometry (EC) device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and echocardiography in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to find a noninvasive technique for estimating left ventricular systolic function during the perioperative period.\\n\\n\\n\\nSystolic time ratio data were obtained simultaneously from the electrical cardiometry device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and transthoracic echocardiography at the following predefined timepoints— before anaesthesia induction (T0 baseline), after induction (T1), at the end of the surgery(T2), and after extubation (T3) in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The agreement between the systolic time ratio measured by electrical cardiometry and transthoracic echocardiography was studied using Bland-Altman plots. Paired t-tests were used to compare systolic time ratio measurements at different time points.\\n\\n\\n\\nMean STR by EC and Echocardiography at T0 was 0.456 (0.429-0.483) and 0.348 (0.330-.366) at T1 was 0.464 (0.442 -0.486) and 0.372 (0.344-0.401) at T2 was 0.421 (0.402 -0.439) and 0.305 (0.290-0.320) and at T3 was 0.438 (0.419-0.457) and 0.353 (0.336-0.370), P value <0.001. Bland-Altman analysis showed that EC measured STR compared with echocardiography at T0 with a mean bias of 0.108 and (with limits of agreement -0.19 ,0.14) at T1 it was 0.092 (with limits of agreement -0.21,0.40) at T2 it was 0.11 (with limits of agreement -0.04,0.28) and at T3 it was 0.085 (with limits of agreement -0.101 ,0.271).\\n\\n\\n\\nIn conclusion, no association between systolic time ratio as measured by electrical cardiometry and echocardiography was found in our study. Our results do not conclusively prohibit using electrical cardiometry in the perioperative period to evaluate LV systolic function. Further work must be done to establish the role of STR as a surrogate marker of LV systolic function.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/jccc_21_2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Critical Care TSS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jccc_21_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨心脏手术患者心电测量仪(ICON) (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany)测量的收缩时间比(STR)与超声心动图之间的相关性,并寻找一种评估围手术期左心室收缩功能的无创技术。心脏择期手术患者在麻醉诱导前(T0基线)、诱导后(T1)、手术结束时(T2)和拔管后(T3),通过心电仪ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany)和经胸超声心动图同时获得收缩时间比数据。使用Bland-Altman图研究心电测量和经胸超声心动图测量的收缩时间比之间的一致性。采用配对t检验比较不同时间点的收缩时间比测量值。T0时EC和超声心动图平均STR分别为0.456(0.429-0.483)和0.348 (0.330- 0.366),T1为0.464(0.442 -0.486)和0.372 (0.344-0.401),T2为0.421(0.402 -0.439)和0.305 (0.290-0.320),T3为0.438(0.419-0.457)和0.353 (0.336-0.370),P值<0.001。Bland-Altman分析显示,EC测量的STR与超声心动图在T0时的平均偏倚为0.108,在T1时为0.092(一致性限为-0.19,0.14),在T2时为0.11(一致性限为-0.04,0.28),在T3时为0.085(一致性限为-0.101,0.271)。总之,在我们的研究中没有发现心电测量和超声心动图测量的收缩时间比之间的关联。我们的结果并没有明确禁止在围手术期使用心电测量来评估左室收缩功能。必须做进一步的工作来确定STR作为左室收缩功能的替代标志物的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Systolic Time Ratio from Electrical Cardiometry Versus Echocardiography for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
To identify the correlation between systolic time ratio(STR) measured with electrical cardiometry (EC) device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and echocardiography in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to find a noninvasive technique for estimating left ventricular systolic function during the perioperative period. Systolic time ratio data were obtained simultaneously from the electrical cardiometry device ICON (Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany) and transthoracic echocardiography at the following predefined timepoints— before anaesthesia induction (T0 baseline), after induction (T1), at the end of the surgery(T2), and after extubation (T3) in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The agreement between the systolic time ratio measured by electrical cardiometry and transthoracic echocardiography was studied using Bland-Altman plots. Paired t-tests were used to compare systolic time ratio measurements at different time points. Mean STR by EC and Echocardiography at T0 was 0.456 (0.429-0.483) and 0.348 (0.330-.366) at T1 was 0.464 (0.442 -0.486) and 0.372 (0.344-0.401) at T2 was 0.421 (0.402 -0.439) and 0.305 (0.290-0.320) and at T3 was 0.438 (0.419-0.457) and 0.353 (0.336-0.370), P value <0.001. Bland-Altman analysis showed that EC measured STR compared with echocardiography at T0 with a mean bias of 0.108 and (with limits of agreement -0.19 ,0.14) at T1 it was 0.092 (with limits of agreement -0.21,0.40) at T2 it was 0.11 (with limits of agreement -0.04,0.28) and at T3 it was 0.085 (with limits of agreement -0.101 ,0.271). In conclusion, no association between systolic time ratio as measured by electrical cardiometry and echocardiography was found in our study. Our results do not conclusively prohibit using electrical cardiometry in the perioperative period to evaluate LV systolic function. Further work must be done to establish the role of STR as a surrogate marker of LV systolic function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Cardiac Biomarkers and Tetralogy of Fallot Score: Do they Predict Outcomes in Intracardiac Tetralogy of Fallot Repair? The Anesthesiologist as Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Intensivist: Heralding a New Era? Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Nursing Care A Bibliometric Study on Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia: Time and Trends have much to Tell! Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement with Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure of more than 50 mmHg: A Prospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1