G. Bezhanishvili, C. Franks, Selwyn Ng, Dima Sinapova, M. Thomas, Paddy Blanchette, Peter A. Cholak, J. Knight
{"title":"2021年北美符号逻辑协会年会","authors":"G. Bezhanishvili, C. Franks, Selwyn Ng, Dima Sinapova, M. Thomas, Paddy Blanchette, Peter A. Cholak, J. Knight","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the invited 32nd Annual Gödel Lecture MATTHEW FOREMAN, Gödel diffeomorphisms. Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. E-mail: mforeman@math.uci.edu Motivated by problems in physics, solutions to differential equations were studied in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by people like Birkhoff, Poincaré and von Neumann. Poincaré’s work was described by Smale in the 1960s as the qualitative study and von Neumann’s own description was the study of the statistical aspects of differential equations. The explicit goal was to classify this behavior. A contemporaneous problem was whether time forwards could be distinguished from time backwards. The modern formulation of these problems is to classify diffeomorphisms of smooth manifolds up to topological conjugacy and measure isomorphism and to ask, for a given diffeomorphism, whether T ∼= T –1. Very significant progress was made on both classes of problems, in the first case by people like Birkhoff, Morse and Smale and in the second case by Birkhoff, Poincare, von Neumann, Halmos, Kolmogorov, Sinai, Ornstein and Furstenberg. This talk applies techniques developed by Kechris, Louveau and Hjorth to these problems to show that the relevant equivalence relations are complete analytic. Moreover the collection of T that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is also complete analytic. Finally, the whole story can be miniaturized to show that the collection of diffeomorphisms of the two-torus that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is Π1-hard. 30","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2021 NORTH AMERICAN ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SYMBOLIC LOGIC\",\"authors\":\"G. Bezhanishvili, C. Franks, Selwyn Ng, Dima Sinapova, M. Thomas, Paddy Blanchette, Peter A. Cholak, J. Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/bsl.2021.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of the invited 32nd Annual Gödel Lecture MATTHEW FOREMAN, Gödel diffeomorphisms. Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. E-mail: mforeman@math.uci.edu Motivated by problems in physics, solutions to differential equations were studied in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by people like Birkhoff, Poincaré and von Neumann. Poincaré’s work was described by Smale in the 1960s as the qualitative study and von Neumann’s own description was the study of the statistical aspects of differential equations. The explicit goal was to classify this behavior. A contemporaneous problem was whether time forwards could be distinguished from time backwards. The modern formulation of these problems is to classify diffeomorphisms of smooth manifolds up to topological conjugacy and measure isomorphism and to ask, for a given diffeomorphism, whether T ∼= T –1. Very significant progress was made on both classes of problems, in the first case by people like Birkhoff, Morse and Smale and in the second case by Birkhoff, Poincare, von Neumann, Halmos, Kolmogorov, Sinai, Ornstein and Furstenberg. This talk applies techniques developed by Kechris, Louveau and Hjorth to these problems to show that the relevant equivalence relations are complete analytic. Moreover the collection of T that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is also complete analytic. Finally, the whole story can be miniaturized to show that the collection of diffeomorphisms of the two-torus that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is Π1-hard. 30\",\"PeriodicalId\":22265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
受邀参加第32届Gödel年度讲座MATTHEW FOREMAN, Gödel微分同态。美国加州大学欧文分校数学系。受物理学问题的启发,19世纪末和20世纪初,伯克霍夫、庞加莱和冯·诺伊曼等人开始研究微分方程的解。20世纪60年代,斯梅尔把庞加莱的工作描述为定性研究,而冯·诺伊曼自己的描述则是对微分方程统计方面的研究。明确的目标是对这种行为进行分类。当时的一个问题是能否区分向前的时间和向后的时间。这些问题的现代表述是对光滑流形的微分同构进行分类,直到拓扑共轭和测量同构,并问,对于给定的微分同构,是否T ~ = T -1。在这两类问题上都取得了重大进展,第一类是由伯克霍夫、莫尔斯和斯梅尔等人完成的,第二类是由伯克霍夫、庞加莱、冯·诺伊曼、哈尔莫斯、科尔莫戈罗夫、西奈、奥恩斯坦和弗斯滕伯格完成的。本讲座运用Kechris, Louveau和Hjorth的技术来解决这些问题,以证明相关的等价关系是完全解析的。此外,T的集合在理论上与它们的逆测度同构也是完全解析的。最后,整个故事可以被缩小,以表明在理论上与它们的逆同构的两个环面的微分同构的集合是Π1-hard。30.
2021 NORTH AMERICAN ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SYMBOLIC LOGIC
of the invited 32nd Annual Gödel Lecture MATTHEW FOREMAN, Gödel diffeomorphisms. Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. E-mail: mforeman@math.uci.edu Motivated by problems in physics, solutions to differential equations were studied in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by people like Birkhoff, Poincaré and von Neumann. Poincaré’s work was described by Smale in the 1960s as the qualitative study and von Neumann’s own description was the study of the statistical aspects of differential equations. The explicit goal was to classify this behavior. A contemporaneous problem was whether time forwards could be distinguished from time backwards. The modern formulation of these problems is to classify diffeomorphisms of smooth manifolds up to topological conjugacy and measure isomorphism and to ask, for a given diffeomorphism, whether T ∼= T –1. Very significant progress was made on both classes of problems, in the first case by people like Birkhoff, Morse and Smale and in the second case by Birkhoff, Poincare, von Neumann, Halmos, Kolmogorov, Sinai, Ornstein and Furstenberg. This talk applies techniques developed by Kechris, Louveau and Hjorth to these problems to show that the relevant equivalence relations are complete analytic. Moreover the collection of T that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is also complete analytic. Finally, the whole story can be miniaturized to show that the collection of diffeomorphisms of the two-torus that are measure theoretically isomorphic to their inverses is Π1-hard. 30