{"title":"通讯","authors":"Chiara Oriti Niosi, Loreta Tellería Escobar","doi":"10.1055/s-2006-933420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a more effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer and more effective in the neoadjuvant setting than tamoxifen. We compared letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for steroid-hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Methods: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study is a randomized, phase 3, doubleblind trial that compared five years of treatment with various adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: letrozole, letrozole followed by tamoxifen, tamoxifen, and tamoxifen followed by letrozole. This analysis compares the two groups assigned to receive letrozole initially with the two groups assigned to receive tamoxifen initially; events and follow-up in the sequential-treatment groups were included up to the time that treatmentswere switched. Results: A total of 8010 women with data that could be assessed were enrolled, 4003 in the letrozole group and 4007 in the tamoxifen group. After a median follow-up of 25.8 months, 351 events had occurred in the letrozole group and 428 events in the tamoxifen group, with fi ve-year disease-free survival estimates of 84.0 percent and 81.4 percent, respectively. As compared with tamoxifen, letrozole significantly reduced the risk of an event ending a period of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.93; P = 0.003), especially the risk of distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.88; P = 0.001). Thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal bleeding were more common in the tamoxifen group. Women given letrozole had a higher incidence of skeletal and cardiac events and of hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: In Newsletter1_2006.indd XI 17.02.2006 13:47:37 XII S c h w e iz Newsletter 1/2006 der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Senologie postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with letrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, reduced the risk of recurrent disease, especially at distant sites. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004205.) Breast Cancer Research and Treatment High Ep-CAM Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Node-positive Breast Cancer Gilbert Spizzo, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Peter Obrist, Ronald Simon, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Rahel Bart, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Ossi Robert Köchli, Philip Haas, Friedrich Mross, Markus Zuber, Holger Dietrich, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Guenther Gastl Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 1446—1452 Impact factor (2004) 3.13 Division of Haematology and Oncology; Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Pathology; Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Basel; Institute of Pathology and Cytology Boss and Spichtin, Basel; Department of Pathology; Department of Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, City Hospital Zürich, Zürich; Surgery Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland; City Hospital Lörrach, Lörrach; Gynaecological Hospital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Germany","PeriodicalId":77424,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of human genetics","volume":"16 1","pages":"243-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newsletter\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Oriti Niosi, Loreta Tellería Escobar\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2006-933420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a more effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer and more effective in the neoadjuvant setting than tamoxifen. We compared letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for steroid-hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Methods: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study is a randomized, phase 3, doubleblind trial that compared five years of treatment with various adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: letrozole, letrozole followed by tamoxifen, tamoxifen, and tamoxifen followed by letrozole. This analysis compares the two groups assigned to receive letrozole initially with the two groups assigned to receive tamoxifen initially; events and follow-up in the sequential-treatment groups were included up to the time that treatmentswere switched. Results: A total of 8010 women with data that could be assessed were enrolled, 4003 in the letrozole group and 4007 in the tamoxifen group. After a median follow-up of 25.8 months, 351 events had occurred in the letrozole group and 428 events in the tamoxifen group, with fi ve-year disease-free survival estimates of 84.0 percent and 81.4 percent, respectively. As compared with tamoxifen, letrozole significantly reduced the risk of an event ending a period of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.93; P = 0.003), especially the risk of distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.88; P = 0.001). Thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal bleeding were more common in the tamoxifen group. Women given letrozole had a higher incidence of skeletal and cardiac events and of hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: In Newsletter1_2006.indd XI 17.02.2006 13:47:37 XII S c h w e iz Newsletter 1/2006 der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Senologie postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with letrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, reduced the risk of recurrent disease, especially at distant sites. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004205.) Breast Cancer Research and Treatment High Ep-CAM Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Node-positive Breast Cancer Gilbert Spizzo, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Peter Obrist, Ronald Simon, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Rahel Bart, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Ossi Robert Köchli, Philip Haas, Friedrich Mross, Markus Zuber, Holger Dietrich, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Guenther Gastl Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 1446—1452 Impact factor (2004) 3.13 Division of Haematology and Oncology; Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Pathology; Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Basel; Institute of Pathology and Cytology Boss and Spichtin, Basel; Department of Pathology; Department of Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, City Hospital Zürich, Zürich; Surgery Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland; City Hospital Lörrach, Lörrach; Gynaecological Hospital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Germany\",\"PeriodicalId\":77424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Japanese journal of human genetics\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"243-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Japanese journal of human genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-933420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-933420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑是一种更有效的治疗转移性乳腺癌的药物,在新辅助治疗中比他莫昔芬更有效。我们比较了来曲唑和他莫昔芬作为绝经后妇女类固醇激素受体阳性乳腺癌的辅助治疗。方法:Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98研究是一项随机、3期、双盲试验,比较了绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌妇女5年的各种辅助内分泌治疗方案:来曲唑、来曲唑+他莫昔芬、他莫昔芬和他莫昔芬+来曲唑。该分析比较了最初接受来曲唑的两组和最初接受他莫昔芬的两组;顺序治疗组的事件和随访包括到治疗切换的时间。结果:共有8010名有资料可评估的女性入组,来曲唑组4003名,他莫昔芬组4007名。在中位随访25.8个月后,来曲唑组发生了351起事件,他莫昔芬组发生了428起事件,5年无病生存率分别为84.0%和81.4%。与他莫昔芬相比,来曲唑显著降低了事件结束无病生存期的风险(风险比,0.81;95%置信区间为0.70 ~ 0.93;P = 0.003),尤其是远处复发的风险(风险比,0.73;95%置信区间为0.60 ~ 0.88;P = 0.001)。血栓栓塞、子宫内膜癌和阴道出血在他莫昔芬组更为常见。服用来曲唑的妇女骨骼和心脏事件以及高胆固醇血症的发生率更高。结论:见Newsletter1_2006。绝经后内分泌反应性乳腺癌妇女,与他莫昔芬相比,来曲唑辅助治疗降低了疾病复发的风险,特别是在远处部位。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT00004205)高表达的Ep-CAM与结阳性乳腺癌预后不良相关Gilbert Spizzo, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Peter Obrist, Ronald Simon, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Rahel Bart, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Ossi Robert Köchli, Philip Haas, Friedrich Mross, Markus Zuber, Holger Dietrich, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Guenther Gastl Eur J Cancer 2005;41: 1446-1452影响因子(2004)3.13血液学和肿瘤学;奥地利因斯布鲁克大学病理学系;病理学系;内科;瑞士巴塞尔大学妇产科;巴塞尔病理与细胞学研究所Boss and Spichtin;病理学系;zrich市医院外科,妇产科,zrich;瑞士奥尔滕外科医院;市医院Lörrach, Lörrach;莱茵菲尔登妇科医院,莱茵菲尔登,德国
Background: The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a more effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer and more effective in the neoadjuvant setting than tamoxifen. We compared letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for steroid-hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Methods: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study is a randomized, phase 3, doubleblind trial that compared five years of treatment with various adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: letrozole, letrozole followed by tamoxifen, tamoxifen, and tamoxifen followed by letrozole. This analysis compares the two groups assigned to receive letrozole initially with the two groups assigned to receive tamoxifen initially; events and follow-up in the sequential-treatment groups were included up to the time that treatmentswere switched. Results: A total of 8010 women with data that could be assessed were enrolled, 4003 in the letrozole group and 4007 in the tamoxifen group. After a median follow-up of 25.8 months, 351 events had occurred in the letrozole group and 428 events in the tamoxifen group, with fi ve-year disease-free survival estimates of 84.0 percent and 81.4 percent, respectively. As compared with tamoxifen, letrozole significantly reduced the risk of an event ending a period of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.93; P = 0.003), especially the risk of distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.88; P = 0.001). Thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal bleeding were more common in the tamoxifen group. Women given letrozole had a higher incidence of skeletal and cardiac events and of hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: In Newsletter1_2006.indd XI 17.02.2006 13:47:37 XII S c h w e iz Newsletter 1/2006 der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Senologie postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with letrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, reduced the risk of recurrent disease, especially at distant sites. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004205.) Breast Cancer Research and Treatment High Ep-CAM Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Node-positive Breast Cancer Gilbert Spizzo, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Peter Obrist, Ronald Simon, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Rahel Bart, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Ossi Robert Köchli, Philip Haas, Friedrich Mross, Markus Zuber, Holger Dietrich, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Guenther Gastl Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 1446—1452 Impact factor (2004) 3.13 Division of Haematology and Oncology; Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Pathology; Department of Internal Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Basel; Institute of Pathology and Cytology Boss and Spichtin, Basel; Department of Pathology; Department of Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, City Hospital Zürich, Zürich; Surgery Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland; City Hospital Lörrach, Lörrach; Gynaecological Hospital Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Germany