监管独立电力生产商

Peter S. Fox-Penner
{"title":"监管独立电力生产商","authors":"Peter S. Fox-Penner","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(90)90045-K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) enabled private, unregulated power generators to sell electricity to electric utilities. PURPA required states to adopt somewhat flexible implementation policies with the uniform objective of facilitating sales between private producers and utilities. In contrast to many published anecdotal accounts of PURPA's impact, this research constructs a model of cogeneration investment as a function of state prices and state PURPA regulations. Tests of the model using data from around 1985 indicate that interstate regulatory differences have significant and sometimes counterintuitive impacts on private generation. Electricity and fuel prices significantly affect the amount of private capacity installed, but regulatory effects dominate the decision to invest or not to invest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(90)90045-K","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating independent power producers\",\"authors\":\"Peter S. Fox-Penner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-0572(90)90045-K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) enabled private, unregulated power generators to sell electricity to electric utilities. PURPA required states to adopt somewhat flexible implementation policies with the uniform objective of facilitating sales between private producers and utilities. In contrast to many published anecdotal accounts of PURPA's impact, this research constructs a model of cogeneration investment as a function of state prices and state PURPA regulations. Tests of the model using data from around 1985 indicate that interstate regulatory differences have significant and sometimes counterintuitive impacts on private generation. Electricity and fuel prices significantly affect the amount of private capacity installed, but regulatory effects dominate the decision to invest or not to invest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(90)90045-K\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729090045K\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729090045K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

1978年的《公用事业管理政策法》(PURPA)允许不受监管的私营发电企业向电力公司出售电力。PURPA要求各州采取一些灵活的实施政策,以促进私人生产商和公用事业公司之间的销售为统一目标。与许多发表的关于PURPA影响的轶事相比,本研究构建了一个热电联产投资模型,作为国家价格和国家PURPA法规的函数。使用1985年前后的数据对该模型进行的测试表明,州际监管差异对私人发电产生了重大的、有时是违反直觉的影响。电力和燃料价格显著影响私人装机容量,但监管效应主导着投资或不投资的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulating independent power producers

The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) enabled private, unregulated power generators to sell electricity to electric utilities. PURPA required states to adopt somewhat flexible implementation policies with the uniform objective of facilitating sales between private producers and utilities. In contrast to many published anecdotal accounts of PURPA's impact, this research constructs a model of cogeneration investment as a function of state prices and state PURPA regulations. Tests of the model using data from around 1985 indicate that interstate regulatory differences have significant and sometimes counterintuitive impacts on private generation. Electricity and fuel prices significantly affect the amount of private capacity installed, but regulatory effects dominate the decision to invest or not to invest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capital recovery for the regulated firm under certainty and regulatory uncertainty The oil market and international agreements on CO2 emissions Land use with endogenous environmental degradation and conservation Announcement and call for papers Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1