不同类型人工晶状体在透明角膜白内障术后的对比敏感度和眩光失能

F.K. Jacobi, T. Kohnen, B. Dick
{"title":"不同类型人工晶状体在透明角膜白内障术后的对比敏感度和眩光失能","authors":"F.K. Jacobi,&nbsp;T. Kohnen,&nbsp;B. Dick","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. <strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. <strong>SETTING:</strong> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. <strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 214-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability in Different IOL Types After Clear-corneal Cataract Surgery\",\"authors\":\"F.K. Jacobi,&nbsp;T. Kohnen,&nbsp;B. Dick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. <strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. <strong>SETTING:</strong> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. <strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 214-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:评价一种PMMA和两种不同的硅胶iol对透明角膜切口超声乳化术患者(最佳病例)对比敏感度和炫光失能的影响。研究设计:术后6个月视力功能的前瞻性临床研究。单位:德国吉森大学眼科。患者:42例患者视力(VA)在0.8 (logMAR单位)及以上。主要观察指标:在光敏条件下使用正弦光栅模式挂图的对比灵敏度(CS) (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio);使用Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar,德国)的中观条件下的CS和眩光残疾。结果:不同IOL组的CS和眩光失能无显著性差异。根据年龄区分,70岁及以上患者CS值明显低于70岁及以下患者。在眩光残疾方面,各年龄组之间没有差异。结论:透明角膜白内障手术成功后,通过对比敏感度和眩光失能测试检查视力,不同的硅胶IOL和PMMA IOL之间没有差异。在VA良好且无其他眼部病理的情况下,患者年龄比iol类型和材料更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability in Different IOL Types After Clear-corneal Cataract Surgery

OBJECTIVE: The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject Index Author Index Editorial Scleral Fixation Re-examined by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Corneal Topography using a New Moiré Image-based System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1