{"title":"不同类型人工晶状体在透明角膜白内障术后的对比敏感度和眩光失能","authors":"F.K. Jacobi, T. Kohnen, B. Dick","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. <strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. <strong>SETTING:</strong> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. <strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 214-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability in Different IOL Types After Clear-corneal Cataract Surgery\",\"authors\":\"F.K. Jacobi, T. Kohnen, B. Dick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. <strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. <strong>SETTING:</strong> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. <strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 214-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability in Different IOL Types After Clear-corneal Cataract Surgery
OBJECTIVE: The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.