电讯业自我规管:评估澳洲电讯业申诉专员计划

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2013-06-24 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2013.054772
Liam Widdowson, Grace Li
{"title":"电讯业自我规管:评估澳洲电讯业申诉专员计划","authors":"Liam Widdowson, Grace Li","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2013.054772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) is a private corporation enacted by parliament as the sole alternate dispute resolution mediator between carriage service providers (CSPs) and consumers. The TIO is designed as an office of last resort and relies on attracting, receiving, investigating and escalating complaints as its sole source of funding. Currently, the Telecommunications Act requires all CSPs to become members of the TIO scheme. The research project was undertaken to study the effectiveness of the TIO scheme in 2010–2011. The project results demonstrated universal and significant dissatisfaction with many material aspects of the TIO scheme. Further, the analysis of TIO key performance metrics uncovered patterns that provide some evidence of the issues raised by CSPs in their responses. A comprehensive legal analysis of the unique position of the TIO considered the sources of power the TIO relies upon and offers some insight into perhaps why the scheme operates in the manner it does. In conclusion, a set of recommendations is made to reform the scheme to provide fair, just and economical outcomes for CSPs and consumers.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telecommunications industry self-regulation: assessing the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Scheme in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Liam Widdowson, Grace Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2013.054772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Australia, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) is a private corporation enacted by parliament as the sole alternate dispute resolution mediator between carriage service providers (CSPs) and consumers. The TIO is designed as an office of last resort and relies on attracting, receiving, investigating and escalating complaints as its sole source of funding. Currently, the Telecommunications Act requires all CSPs to become members of the TIO scheme. The research project was undertaken to study the effectiveness of the TIO scheme in 2010–2011. The project results demonstrated universal and significant dissatisfaction with many material aspects of the TIO scheme. Further, the analysis of TIO key performance metrics uncovered patterns that provide some evidence of the issues raised by CSPs in their responses. A comprehensive legal analysis of the unique position of the TIO considered the sources of power the TIO relies upon and offers some insight into perhaps why the scheme operates in the manner it does. In conclusion, a set of recommendations is made to reform the scheme to provide fair, just and economical outcomes for CSPs and consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.054772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.054772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在澳大利亚,电信行业申诉专员(TIO)是由议会设立的一家私营公司,作为运输服务提供商(csp)和消费者之间唯一的替代争议解决调解人。TIO被设计为最后的办公室,其唯一的资金来源是吸引、接收、调查和升级投诉。目前,《电信法》要求所有csp成为TIO计划的成员。本研究项目于2010-2011年进行,目的是研究TIO计划的成效。项目结果表明,人们普遍对TIO方案的许多实质性方面感到不满。此外,对TIO关键性能指标的分析揭示了一些模式,这些模式为csp在其响应中提出的问题提供了一些证据。对监察主任独特地位的全面法律分析,考虑了监察主任所依赖的权力来源,并提供了一些关于该计划为何以这种方式运作的见解。最后,提出了一套建议,以改革该计划,为csp和消费者提供公平,公正和经济的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telecommunications industry self-regulation: assessing the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Scheme in Australia
In Australia, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) is a private corporation enacted by parliament as the sole alternate dispute resolution mediator between carriage service providers (CSPs) and consumers. The TIO is designed as an office of last resort and relies on attracting, receiving, investigating and escalating complaints as its sole source of funding. Currently, the Telecommunications Act requires all CSPs to become members of the TIO scheme. The research project was undertaken to study the effectiveness of the TIO scheme in 2010–2011. The project results demonstrated universal and significant dissatisfaction with many material aspects of the TIO scheme. Further, the analysis of TIO key performance metrics uncovered patterns that provide some evidence of the issues raised by CSPs in their responses. A comprehensive legal analysis of the unique position of the TIO considered the sources of power the TIO relies upon and offers some insight into perhaps why the scheme operates in the manner it does. In conclusion, a set of recommendations is made to reform the scheme to provide fair, just and economical outcomes for CSPs and consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1