政治与变态(皮尔·保罗·帕索里尼今日的《萨德》)

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/fid2204860a
Oleg Aronson
{"title":"政治与变态(皮尔·保罗·帕索里尼今日的《萨德》)","authors":"Oleg Aronson","doi":"10.2298/fid2204860a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to examine Pier Paolo Pasolini?s film Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom, not only as an adaptation of Marquis de Sade?s work, but as a possible response to the problems of modern society, which reanimates fascism, no longer as political ideology, but as a ?natural? form of contemporary human sensibility. Relying on his original ?semiology of reality,? the expression of which is cinema, Pasolini?s film embodies the non-political logic of fascism as the logic of perversion, hidden behind the facade of political ideology. The article shows that Salo consistently contradicts the key principles of cinematic expressiveness of Pasolini?s theory itself, which focuses on moments in which ?reality? reveals itself (acting as life itself). As a result, the film connects the unconnected - the shock of scenes of torture and sexual violence with a cultural allegory that anesthetizes effect of visual violence. For Pasolini, both violence and culture are mechanisms for analyzing the ephemeral substance of power, which inevitably generates some form of fascism and perversion, while de Sade is the discoverer of the basic sensual (plastic) syntagmas of power, embodied in the figure of the libertine. The sadistic libertinage, which combines the idea of freedom and the practice of torture, finds itself at the very heart of contemporary politics, its operative unconscious.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics and perversion (Pier Paolo Pasolini’s de Sade today)\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Aronson\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/fid2204860a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article attempts to examine Pier Paolo Pasolini?s film Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom, not only as an adaptation of Marquis de Sade?s work, but as a possible response to the problems of modern society, which reanimates fascism, no longer as political ideology, but as a ?natural? form of contemporary human sensibility. Relying on his original ?semiology of reality,? the expression of which is cinema, Pasolini?s film embodies the non-political logic of fascism as the logic of perversion, hidden behind the facade of political ideology. The article shows that Salo consistently contradicts the key principles of cinematic expressiveness of Pasolini?s theory itself, which focuses on moments in which ?reality? reveals itself (acting as life itself). As a result, the film connects the unconnected - the shock of scenes of torture and sexual violence with a cultural allegory that anesthetizes effect of visual violence. For Pasolini, both violence and culture are mechanisms for analyzing the ephemeral substance of power, which inevitably generates some form of fascism and perversion, while de Sade is the discoverer of the basic sensual (plastic) syntagmas of power, embodied in the figure of the libertine. The sadistic libertinage, which combines the idea of freedom and the practice of torture, finds itself at the very heart of contemporary politics, its operative unconscious.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2204860a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2204860a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章试图考察Pier Paolo Pasolini?《索多玛的120天》(Salo)不仅改编自萨德侯爵(Marquis de Sade)的作品。而是作为对现代社会问题的一种可能的回应,它使法西斯主义复活,不再是政治意识形态,而是一种“自然的”?当代人类情感的形式。依靠他独创的现实符号学,它的表达方式是电影,帕索里尼S电影将法西斯主义的非政治逻辑作为变态的逻辑体现出来,隐藏在政治意识形态的表象之下。本文表明,《萨洛》始终与帕索里尼的电影表现力的关键原则相矛盾。S理论本身,它关注的是现实?显示自己(作为生命本身)。因此,这部电影将不相关的——酷刑和性暴力场景的震惊与一种文化寓言联系起来,这种寓言麻醉了视觉暴力的效果。对于帕索里尼来说,暴力和文化都是分析权力的短暂本质的机制,这不可避免地会产生某种形式的法西斯主义和变态,而萨德则是权力的基本感官(塑料)语法的发现,体现在浪子的形象中。虐待狂式的解放,结合了自由的概念和酷刑的实践,发现自己处于当代政治的核心,它的运作无意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Politics and perversion (Pier Paolo Pasolini’s de Sade today)
The article attempts to examine Pier Paolo Pasolini?s film Salo, or 120 Days of Sodom, not only as an adaptation of Marquis de Sade?s work, but as a possible response to the problems of modern society, which reanimates fascism, no longer as political ideology, but as a ?natural? form of contemporary human sensibility. Relying on his original ?semiology of reality,? the expression of which is cinema, Pasolini?s film embodies the non-political logic of fascism as the logic of perversion, hidden behind the facade of political ideology. The article shows that Salo consistently contradicts the key principles of cinematic expressiveness of Pasolini?s theory itself, which focuses on moments in which ?reality? reveals itself (acting as life itself). As a result, the film connects the unconnected - the shock of scenes of torture and sexual violence with a cultural allegory that anesthetizes effect of visual violence. For Pasolini, both violence and culture are mechanisms for analyzing the ephemeral substance of power, which inevitably generates some form of fascism and perversion, while de Sade is the discoverer of the basic sensual (plastic) syntagmas of power, embodied in the figure of the libertine. The sadistic libertinage, which combines the idea of freedom and the practice of torture, finds itself at the very heart of contemporary politics, its operative unconscious.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s education, knowledge and competence in Ancient Greece The role of education in Aristotle’s Politics The roman stoics on the emancipatory potential of the philosophical paideia The writing of existence in the latest work of Alberto Moreiras Recognition as a counter hegemonic strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1