中小企业会计信息系统实施的作用:基于技术接受模型的应用

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Namibian Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.59670/jns.v34i.1276
Nantachai Sasadeeong
{"title":"中小企业会计信息系统实施的作用:基于技术接受模型的应用","authors":"Nantachai Sasadeeong","doi":"10.59670/jns.v34i.1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims 1) to study the level of opinion on acceptance factors, 2) the relationship between acceptance variables, and 3) to retest the causal relationship model for acceptance using the accounting package programme in Bangkok and its vicinity. The mixed method was applied to this research; 500 respondents were collected online and used descriptive statistics to explain percentages, averages, standard dimensions, and analysis through the AMOS programme—interviews with 30 key informants with semi-structured interviews, analysis, and summaries using data analysis elements. The result presented the benefits of using high-level, timely management decisions and reducing posting errors (0.827). The usability was moderate level; it was easily and quickly processed and reconciled more efficiently and accurately (0.899). The effectiveness was high: accurate and faster accounting records, fault prevention systems, and fraud problem reduction (0.870). The intention was high level; essential for the establishment’s work, available online and offline, staff’s support, and they tend to recommend it to friends or establishments (0.832). The used behaviour was high-level, up-to-date, and met accounting certification standards (0.825). The researcher tested the harmonisation of models based on assumptions and empirical data and found that all thresholds were within the acceptable (pass) criteria; CMIN/df = 1.984, GFI. CFI = .988, NFI = .977, TFI = .979, RMR = .979, RMSEA = .044, and hypothesis testing shows that accepting all hypotheses except hypothesis 4 (H4) does not meet the hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":37633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Namibian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROLE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION FOR SMEs: BASED ON APPLICATION OF THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL\",\"authors\":\"Nantachai Sasadeeong\",\"doi\":\"10.59670/jns.v34i.1276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research aims 1) to study the level of opinion on acceptance factors, 2) the relationship between acceptance variables, and 3) to retest the causal relationship model for acceptance using the accounting package programme in Bangkok and its vicinity. The mixed method was applied to this research; 500 respondents were collected online and used descriptive statistics to explain percentages, averages, standard dimensions, and analysis through the AMOS programme—interviews with 30 key informants with semi-structured interviews, analysis, and summaries using data analysis elements. The result presented the benefits of using high-level, timely management decisions and reducing posting errors (0.827). The usability was moderate level; it was easily and quickly processed and reconciled more efficiently and accurately (0.899). The effectiveness was high: accurate and faster accounting records, fault prevention systems, and fraud problem reduction (0.870). The intention was high level; essential for the establishment’s work, available online and offline, staff’s support, and they tend to recommend it to friends or establishments (0.832). The used behaviour was high-level, up-to-date, and met accounting certification standards (0.825). The researcher tested the harmonisation of models based on assumptions and empirical data and found that all thresholds were within the acceptable (pass) criteria; CMIN/df = 1.984, GFI. CFI = .988, NFI = .977, TFI = .979, RMR = .979, RMSEA = .044, and hypothesis testing shows that accepting all hypotheses except hypothesis 4 (H4) does not meet the hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Namibian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Namibian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v34i.1276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Namibian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v34i.1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的目的是1)研究接受因素的意见水平,2)接受变量之间的关系,3)使用曼谷及其周边地区的会计一揽子计划重新检验接受的因果关系模型。本研究采用混合法;在线收集了500名受访者,并使用描述性统计来解释百分比、平均值、标准维度和通过AMOS计划进行的分析,该计划通过半结构化访谈、分析和使用数据分析元素的总结与30名关键线人进行访谈。结果显示了使用高水平、及时的管理决策和减少发布错误的好处(0.827)。可用性为中等水平;处理简便、快速,调和效率高、准确性高(0.899)。效率很高:准确和快速的会计记录,故障预防系统和欺诈问题减少(0.870)。意图是高层次的;对机构的工作至关重要,在线上和离线可用,员工的支持,他们倾向于推荐给朋友或机构(0.832)。使用的行为是高水平的,最新的,并且满足会计认证标准(0.825)。研究人员基于假设和经验数据测试了模型的一致性,发现所有阈值都在可接受(通过)标准之内;CMIN/df = 1.984, GFI。CFI = .988, NFI = .977, TFI = .979, RMR = .979, RMSEA = .044,假设检验表明接受除假设4 (H4)外的所有假设不符合假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ROLE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION FOR SMEs: BASED ON APPLICATION OF THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL
The research aims 1) to study the level of opinion on acceptance factors, 2) the relationship between acceptance variables, and 3) to retest the causal relationship model for acceptance using the accounting package programme in Bangkok and its vicinity. The mixed method was applied to this research; 500 respondents were collected online and used descriptive statistics to explain percentages, averages, standard dimensions, and analysis through the AMOS programme—interviews with 30 key informants with semi-structured interviews, analysis, and summaries using data analysis elements. The result presented the benefits of using high-level, timely management decisions and reducing posting errors (0.827). The usability was moderate level; it was easily and quickly processed and reconciled more efficiently and accurately (0.899). The effectiveness was high: accurate and faster accounting records, fault prevention systems, and fraud problem reduction (0.870). The intention was high level; essential for the establishment’s work, available online and offline, staff’s support, and they tend to recommend it to friends or establishments (0.832). The used behaviour was high-level, up-to-date, and met accounting certification standards (0.825). The researcher tested the harmonisation of models based on assumptions and empirical data and found that all thresholds were within the acceptable (pass) criteria; CMIN/df = 1.984, GFI. CFI = .988, NFI = .977, TFI = .979, RMR = .979, RMSEA = .044, and hypothesis testing shows that accepting all hypotheses except hypothesis 4 (H4) does not meet the hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Namibian Studies
Journal of Namibian Studies Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Durres During The First Norman Attack 1081-1085 Gastrolinguistics Philosophical Wisdom Of Segas’ Produced In Tingkeban Traditional Ceremony As A Strengthening Of National Identity Understanding The Knowledge, Beliefs, And Practices Of Samareños On Red Tide Phenomenon: Implications For Sustainable Management Foreign Investment And Economic Growth In Indonesia (Panel Data Approach, Granger Causality And Vecm) Optical And Numerical Topology Optimization Of Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1