{"title":"2寻找证据","authors":"Inez E. Cooke","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80004-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When the Cochrane Collaboration fulfils its quest to organize the available evidence in a registry of trials and systematic reviews, it will mean that our task to find the best evidence will be much less daunting than it may at present seem. Meanwhile, to be evidence-based practitioners, we must learn the techniques that will make our search both comprehensive and efficient. To find this evidence requires:<span>o<ol><li><span>1.</span><span><p>the construction of a specific question based on the clinical problem;</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>the design of a search strategy that is inclusive but practical;</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>the search of the appropriate database(s);</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>the scan of the retrieved abstracts for the most useful papers for critical appraisal.</p></span></li></ol></span></p><p>Efficient searching for evidence does mean getting to grips with the manifold advantages that computerization can offer us. The use of a computer for this purpose needs, like any other new technique we take on, practice to gain competence and confidence. Within the UK, the National Health Service Research and Development Department has made the collation and dissemination of clinical evidence to practitioners a priority. Hence at present, there is an enormous effort within the UK to make sure that the evidence is in the clinical areas of need, in a format we can use it and available in a place where and when we want it, whether that is the ward or the general practitioner's surgery. The aim is to remove at least some of the barriers that prevent us from becoming individual evidence-based practitioners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 551-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80004-6","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 Finding the evidence\",\"authors\":\"Inez E. Cooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80004-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When the Cochrane Collaboration fulfils its quest to organize the available evidence in a registry of trials and systematic reviews, it will mean that our task to find the best evidence will be much less daunting than it may at present seem. Meanwhile, to be evidence-based practitioners, we must learn the techniques that will make our search both comprehensive and efficient. To find this evidence requires:<span>o<ol><li><span>1.</span><span><p>the construction of a specific question based on the clinical problem;</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>the design of a search strategy that is inclusive but practical;</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>the search of the appropriate database(s);</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>the scan of the retrieved abstracts for the most useful papers for critical appraisal.</p></span></li></ol></span></p><p>Efficient searching for evidence does mean getting to grips with the manifold advantages that computerization can offer us. The use of a computer for this purpose needs, like any other new technique we take on, practice to gain competence and confidence. Within the UK, the National Health Service Research and Development Department has made the collation and dissemination of clinical evidence to practitioners a priority. Hence at present, there is an enormous effort within the UK to make sure that the evidence is in the clinical areas of need, in a format we can use it and available in a place where and when we want it, whether that is the ward or the general practitioner's surgery. The aim is to remove at least some of the barriers that prevent us from becoming individual evidence-based practitioners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 551-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80004-6\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

当Cochrane协作完成了将现有证据整理成试验和系统评价的任务时,这将意味着我们寻找最佳证据的任务将不会像现在看起来那么艰巨。与此同时,作为循证从业者,我们必须学习使我们的搜索既全面又有效的技术。要找到这个证据需要:1。1 .基于临床问题的具体问题构建;2 .搜索策略的设计,既包容又实用;3 .检索适当的数据库;检索摘要的扫描,以寻找对批判性评估最有用的论文。有效地寻找证据确实意味着要掌握计算机化能给我们带来的多种优势。为了这个目的而使用计算机,就像我们采用任何其他新技术一样,需要通过练习来获得能力和信心。在联合王国,国家卫生服务研究和发展部已将临床证据的整理和传播作为一项优先事项。因此,目前在英国有一个巨大的努力,以确保证据是在临床需要的领域,在一种我们可以使用它的格式,并在我们需要的地方和时间,无论是病房还是全科医生的手术。其目的是至少消除一些阻碍我们成为以证据为基础的个体实践者的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 Finding the evidence

When the Cochrane Collaboration fulfils its quest to organize the available evidence in a registry of trials and systematic reviews, it will mean that our task to find the best evidence will be much less daunting than it may at present seem. Meanwhile, to be evidence-based practitioners, we must learn the techniques that will make our search both comprehensive and efficient. To find this evidence requires:o

  1. 1.

    the construction of a specific question based on the clinical problem;

  2. 2.

    the design of a search strategy that is inclusive but practical;

  3. 3.

    the search of the appropriate database(s);

  4. 4.

    the scan of the retrieved abstracts for the most useful papers for critical appraisal.

Efficient searching for evidence does mean getting to grips with the manifold advantages that computerization can offer us. The use of a computer for this purpose needs, like any other new technique we take on, practice to gain competence and confidence. Within the UK, the National Health Service Research and Development Department has made the collation and dissemination of clinical evidence to practitioners a priority. Hence at present, there is an enormous effort within the UK to make sure that the evidence is in the clinical areas of need, in a format we can use it and available in a place where and when we want it, whether that is the ward or the general practitioner's surgery. The aim is to remove at least some of the barriers that prevent us from becoming individual evidence-based practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy. Contributors to this issue Preface 3 Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1