常规耕作、免耕和旧田制土壤表面节肢动物种群的比较

A.Y. Blumberg, D.A. Crossley Jr.
{"title":"常规耕作、免耕和旧田制土壤表面节肢动物种群的比较","authors":"A.Y. Blumberg,&nbsp;D.A. Crossley Jr.","doi":"10.1016/0304-3746(83)90007-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) sorghum and adjacent old field (OF) were compared using pitfall trap captures. Overall diversity (<span><math><mtext>H</mtext></math></span>) and similarity quotients (QS) between systems were calculated for each of seven 24-h sampling periods throughout the season. Diversity of the soil surface arthropods was greater in NT than either CT or OF. Although each system was distinct (any two of the systems had less than 30% of their species in common), NT was most similar to OF and least similar to CT during a period of drought and after heading of the sorghum. Percentages of individuals and species represented by spiders were similar in NT (30 and 15%) and OF (22 and 17%); percentages were substantially less in CT (11 and 8%). Yields (biomass of sorghum) in CT and NT were not significantly different despite the generally predicted higher pest populations in NT in the absence of insecticides. Leaf area grazed by insects was greater in CT (28%) than in NT (12%).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100066,"journal":{"name":"Agro-Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3746(83)90007-0","citationCount":"101","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage, no-tillage and old field systems\",\"authors\":\"A.Y. Blumberg,&nbsp;D.A. Crossley Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3746(83)90007-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) sorghum and adjacent old field (OF) were compared using pitfall trap captures. Overall diversity (<span><math><mtext>H</mtext></math></span>) and similarity quotients (QS) between systems were calculated for each of seven 24-h sampling periods throughout the season. Diversity of the soil surface arthropods was greater in NT than either CT or OF. Although each system was distinct (any two of the systems had less than 30% of their species in common), NT was most similar to OF and least similar to CT during a period of drought and after heading of the sorghum. Percentages of individuals and species represented by spiders were similar in NT (30 and 15%) and OF (22 and 17%); percentages were substantially less in CT (11 and 8%). Yields (biomass of sorghum) in CT and NT were not significantly different despite the generally predicted higher pest populations in NT in the absence of insecticides. Leaf area grazed by insects was greater in CT (28%) than in NT (12%).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agro-Ecosystems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3746(83)90007-0\",\"citationCount\":\"101\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agro-Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304374683900070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro-Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304374683900070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 101

摘要

采用诱捕法比较了常规耕作和免耕作高粱及其邻近老田土壤表面节肢动物种群数量。在整个季节的7个24小时采样周期中,计算系统之间的总体多样性(H)和相似性商数(QS)。NT土壤表层节肢动物多样性高于CT和of。虽然每个系统都是不同的(任何两个系统的共同物种少于30%),但在干旱时期和高粱抽穗后,NT与of最相似,与CT最不相似。蜘蛛所代表的个体和种类百分比在NT(30%和15%)和of(22%和17%)中相似;CT上的比例要低得多(11%和8%)。尽管普遍预测在不施用杀虫剂的情况下,华北地区的害虫种群数量会增加,但华北地区和华北地区的产量(高粱生物量)没有显著差异。昆虫掠食的叶面积,试验区(28%)大于试验区(12%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage, no-tillage and old field systems

Soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) sorghum and adjacent old field (OF) were compared using pitfall trap captures. Overall diversity (H) and similarity quotients (QS) between systems were calculated for each of seven 24-h sampling periods throughout the season. Diversity of the soil surface arthropods was greater in NT than either CT or OF. Although each system was distinct (any two of the systems had less than 30% of their species in common), NT was most similar to OF and least similar to CT during a period of drought and after heading of the sorghum. Percentages of individuals and species represented by spiders were similar in NT (30 and 15%) and OF (22 and 17%); percentages were substantially less in CT (11 and 8%). Yields (biomass of sorghum) in CT and NT were not significantly different despite the generally predicted higher pest populations in NT in the absence of insecticides. Leaf area grazed by insects was greater in CT (28%) than in NT (12%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Subject index Author index Elsevier's dictionary of weeds of western Europe Energy and economics of intensive animal production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1