用于体内药物反应评估的介入图像引导微型装置植入和回收方法。

American Journal of Physiology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 Epub Date: 2019-09-26 DOI:10.1002/mp.13803
Sharath K Bhagavatula, Kunj Upadhyaya, Brendyn J Miller, Patrick Bursch, Alex Lammers, Michael J Cima, Stuart G Silverman, Oliver Jonas
{"title":"用于体内药物反应评估的介入图像引导微型装置植入和回收方法。","authors":"Sharath K Bhagavatula, Kunj Upadhyaya, Brendyn J Miller, Patrick Bursch, Alex Lammers, Michael J Cima, Stuart G Silverman, Oliver Jonas","doi":"10.1002/mp.13803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently developed implantable microdevices can perform multi-drug response assessment of cancer drugs in-vivo, with potential to develop highly optimized personalized cancer treatment strategies. However, minimally invasive/interventional image-guided methods of in-vivo microdevice implantation, securement, and retrieval are needed for broad clinical translation. Here we demonstrate proof-of-concept of an interventional microdevice implantation and retrieval method for personalized drug response assessment, using ex-vivo phantom, ex-vivo tissue, and in-vivo murine models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A method for minimally-invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval was developed, by which a custom-prototyped 6 mm retrievable microdevice can be implanted into a live tumor, deliver drugs into 10 discrete regions of adjacent tissue, and retrieved along with the adjacent drug-exposed tissue with a custom-prototyped retrieval needle device to allow in-vivo multi-drug response assessment. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US)-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval were tested in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models. Successful retrieval was defined as retrieval of the microdevice and adjacent core phantom/tissue sample containing at least 4/10 drug delivery sites. Subsequently, 10 implantation and retrieval trials in phantom models were performed using bi-axial and tri-axial retrieval needles; success rates were calculated and compared using a two-proportion z-test and the number of successfully retrieved drug release sites per microdevice was calculated and compared using a one-tailed independent t-test. Finally, five microdevices, each containing ten reservoirs preloaded with chemotherapy agent Doxorubicin, were implanted into mouse tumors in-vivo, secured for 24-h during drug release, and microdevice/tissue retrieval was performed under ultrasound guidance. Fluorescence microscopy of the retrieved tissue was used to confirm drug delivery and apoptosis staining assessed in-vivo tissue response; correlation of drug release and apoptosis staining were used to assess in-vivo drug efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval were successful in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models with both US and CT guidance. Bi-axial retrieval success rate was significantly higher than triaxial retrieval in ex-vivo phantom trials (90% vs 50%, z = 1.95, P = 0.026), and had nonsignificantly higher number of retrieved drug-release sites per microdevice (8.3 vs 7.0, t = 1.37, P = 0.097). Bi-axial retrieval was successful in all five in-vivo mouse tumor models, and allowed in-vivo drug response assessment at up to ten discrete drug delivery sites per microdevice. An average of 6.8/10 discrete tumor sites containing micro-doses of delivered drug were retrieved per in-vivo attempt (min 5, max 10, std 1.93). Tissue regions of drug delivery, as assessed with fluorescent Doxorubicin drug signal, correlated with regions of apoptosis staining in all in-vivo models, indicating drug efficacy. No bleeding, microdevice migration, or other complications were noted during implantation, 24-h observation, or retrieval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The demonstrated image-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval method is similar to routine outpatient biopsy procedures, obviates the need for surgery, and can be performed at varying depths under CT and/or US guidance. There is potential for this method to enable clinical translation of in-vivo personalized drug response assessment/prediction in a much larger number of patients than currently possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":7590,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physiology","volume":"88 1","pages":"5134-5143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interventional image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval method for in-vivo drug response assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Sharath K Bhagavatula, Kunj Upadhyaya, Brendyn J Miller, Patrick Bursch, Alex Lammers, Michael J Cima, Stuart G Silverman, Oliver Jonas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.13803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently developed implantable microdevices can perform multi-drug response assessment of cancer drugs in-vivo, with potential to develop highly optimized personalized cancer treatment strategies. However, minimally invasive/interventional image-guided methods of in-vivo microdevice implantation, securement, and retrieval are needed for broad clinical translation. Here we demonstrate proof-of-concept of an interventional microdevice implantation and retrieval method for personalized drug response assessment, using ex-vivo phantom, ex-vivo tissue, and in-vivo murine models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A method for minimally-invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval was developed, by which a custom-prototyped 6 mm retrievable microdevice can be implanted into a live tumor, deliver drugs into 10 discrete regions of adjacent tissue, and retrieved along with the adjacent drug-exposed tissue with a custom-prototyped retrieval needle device to allow in-vivo multi-drug response assessment. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US)-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval were tested in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models. Successful retrieval was defined as retrieval of the microdevice and adjacent core phantom/tissue sample containing at least 4/10 drug delivery sites. Subsequently, 10 implantation and retrieval trials in phantom models were performed using bi-axial and tri-axial retrieval needles; success rates were calculated and compared using a two-proportion z-test and the number of successfully retrieved drug release sites per microdevice was calculated and compared using a one-tailed independent t-test. Finally, five microdevices, each containing ten reservoirs preloaded with chemotherapy agent Doxorubicin, were implanted into mouse tumors in-vivo, secured for 24-h during drug release, and microdevice/tissue retrieval was performed under ultrasound guidance. Fluorescence microscopy of the retrieved tissue was used to confirm drug delivery and apoptosis staining assessed in-vivo tissue response; correlation of drug release and apoptosis staining were used to assess in-vivo drug efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval were successful in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models with both US and CT guidance. Bi-axial retrieval success rate was significantly higher than triaxial retrieval in ex-vivo phantom trials (90% vs 50%, z = 1.95, P = 0.026), and had nonsignificantly higher number of retrieved drug-release sites per microdevice (8.3 vs 7.0, t = 1.37, P = 0.097). Bi-axial retrieval was successful in all five in-vivo mouse tumor models, and allowed in-vivo drug response assessment at up to ten discrete drug delivery sites per microdevice. An average of 6.8/10 discrete tumor sites containing micro-doses of delivered drug were retrieved per in-vivo attempt (min 5, max 10, std 1.93). Tissue regions of drug delivery, as assessed with fluorescent Doxorubicin drug signal, correlated with regions of apoptosis staining in all in-vivo models, indicating drug efficacy. No bleeding, microdevice migration, or other complications were noted during implantation, 24-h observation, or retrieval.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The demonstrated image-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval method is similar to routine outpatient biopsy procedures, obviates the need for surgery, and can be performed at varying depths under CT and/or US guidance. There is potential for this method to enable clinical translation of in-vivo personalized drug response assessment/prediction in a much larger number of patients than currently possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physiology\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"5134-5143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近开发的植入式微型装置可在体内对癌症药物进行多种药物反应评估,有望开发出高度优化的个性化癌症治疗策略。然而,体内微型装置的植入、固定和回收需要微创/介入图像引导方法,以实现广泛的临床转化。在此,我们利用体外模型、体外组织和体内小鼠模型,展示了用于个性化药物反应评估的介入性微装置植入和回收方法的概念验证:方法:开发了一种微创微型装置植入和取出方法,通过这种方法可将定制的 6 毫米可取式微装置植入活体肿瘤,向邻近组织的 10 个离散区域输送药物,并用定制的取针装置将邻近药物暴露组织一并取出,以进行体内多种药物反应评估。在体外模型和组织模型中测试了计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声波(US)引导下的微创微型装置植入和回收。成功取回的定义是取回微装置和至少包含 4/10 个给药点的邻近核心模型/组织样本。随后,使用双轴和三轴取回针在模型中进行了 10 次植入和取回试验;使用双比例 z 检验计算和比较成功率,使用单尾独立 t 检验计算和比较每个微器件成功取回的药物释放点数量。最后,将五个微装置(每个装置包含十个预装化疗药物多柔比星的储库)植入小鼠体内肿瘤,在药物释放期间固定24小时,并在超声引导下进行微装置/组织回收。取回组织的荧光显微镜用于确认药物输送,凋亡染色用于评估体内组织反应;药物释放和凋亡染色的相关性用于评估体内药物疗效:结果:在US和CT引导下,在体外模型和组织模型中成功进行了图像引导下的微型装置植入和取出。在体外模型试验中,双轴取回成功率明显高于三轴取回(90% vs 50%,z = 1.95,P = 0.026),每个微器件取回的药物释放点数量也明显高于三轴取回(8.3 vs 7.0,t = 1.37,P = 0.097)。双轴检索在所有五种体内小鼠肿瘤模型中都取得了成功,并可对每个微装置上多达十个离散给药点进行体内药物反应评估。每次体内尝试平均可在 6.8/10 个离散的肿瘤部位取回微剂量的给药剂量(最少 5 个,最多 10 个,标准差 1.93)。用荧光多柔比星药物信号评估的组织给药区域与所有体内模型的细胞凋亡染色区域相关,表明药物具有疗效。在植入、24 小时观察或取出过程中,未发现出血、微型装置移位或其他并发症:所展示的图像引导微创微器件植入和取出方法与常规门诊活检程序相似,无需手术,可在 CT 和/或 US 引导下在不同深度进行。这种方法有可能使体内个性化药物反应评估/预测的临床转化成为可能,其适用患者数量远远超过目前的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An interventional image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval method for in-vivo drug response assessment.

Purpose: Recently developed implantable microdevices can perform multi-drug response assessment of cancer drugs in-vivo, with potential to develop highly optimized personalized cancer treatment strategies. However, minimally invasive/interventional image-guided methods of in-vivo microdevice implantation, securement, and retrieval are needed for broad clinical translation. Here we demonstrate proof-of-concept of an interventional microdevice implantation and retrieval method for personalized drug response assessment, using ex-vivo phantom, ex-vivo tissue, and in-vivo murine models.

Methods: A method for minimally-invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval was developed, by which a custom-prototyped 6 mm retrievable microdevice can be implanted into a live tumor, deliver drugs into 10 discrete regions of adjacent tissue, and retrieved along with the adjacent drug-exposed tissue with a custom-prototyped retrieval needle device to allow in-vivo multi-drug response assessment. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US)-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval were tested in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models. Successful retrieval was defined as retrieval of the microdevice and adjacent core phantom/tissue sample containing at least 4/10 drug delivery sites. Subsequently, 10 implantation and retrieval trials in phantom models were performed using bi-axial and tri-axial retrieval needles; success rates were calculated and compared using a two-proportion z-test and the number of successfully retrieved drug release sites per microdevice was calculated and compared using a one-tailed independent t-test. Finally, five microdevices, each containing ten reservoirs preloaded with chemotherapy agent Doxorubicin, were implanted into mouse tumors in-vivo, secured for 24-h during drug release, and microdevice/tissue retrieval was performed under ultrasound guidance. Fluorescence microscopy of the retrieved tissue was used to confirm drug delivery and apoptosis staining assessed in-vivo tissue response; correlation of drug release and apoptosis staining were used to assess in-vivo drug efficacy.

Results: Image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval were successful in ex-vivo phantom and tissue models with both US and CT guidance. Bi-axial retrieval success rate was significantly higher than triaxial retrieval in ex-vivo phantom trials (90% vs 50%, z = 1.95, P = 0.026), and had nonsignificantly higher number of retrieved drug-release sites per microdevice (8.3 vs 7.0, t = 1.37, P = 0.097). Bi-axial retrieval was successful in all five in-vivo mouse tumor models, and allowed in-vivo drug response assessment at up to ten discrete drug delivery sites per microdevice. An average of 6.8/10 discrete tumor sites containing micro-doses of delivered drug were retrieved per in-vivo attempt (min 5, max 10, std 1.93). Tissue regions of drug delivery, as assessed with fluorescent Doxorubicin drug signal, correlated with regions of apoptosis staining in all in-vivo models, indicating drug efficacy. No bleeding, microdevice migration, or other complications were noted during implantation, 24-h observation, or retrieval.

Conclusions: The demonstrated image-guided minimally invasive microdevice implantation and retrieval method is similar to routine outpatient biopsy procedures, obviates the need for surgery, and can be performed at varying depths under CT and/or US guidance. There is potential for this method to enable clinical translation of in-vivo personalized drug response assessment/prediction in a much larger number of patients than currently possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Intraoperative Fascial Traction in Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery; An Early Experience. Microvessel occlusions alter amyloid-beta plaque morphology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. De virtuele diabeteskliniek in een stroomversnelling? An interventional image-guided microdevice implantation and retrieval method for in-vivo drug response assessment. Methods for Congenital Thumb Hypoplasia Reconstruction. A Review of the Outcomes for Ten Years of Surgical Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1