抽样和效度

B. McEwan
{"title":"抽样和效度","authors":"B. McEwan","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2020.1792793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sampling strategies are directly related to external validity. The choices researchers make in selecting sampling frames and sampling participants need to be clearly articulated. Sampling choices can introduce a variety of biases into research findings that reduce the external validity of samples. This essay discusses the relationship between sampling and external validity and provides a brief overview of important sampling concepts including power, the central limit theorem, nonprobability sampling and probability sampling. Sampling related biases are overviewed in the context of communication research. Finally, strategies that researchers and the discipline as a whole might adopt to ameliorate validity concerns related to sampling are proposed.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"59 1","pages":"235 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling and validity\",\"authors\":\"B. McEwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23808985.2020.1792793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sampling strategies are directly related to external validity. The choices researchers make in selecting sampling frames and sampling participants need to be clearly articulated. Sampling choices can introduce a variety of biases into research findings that reduce the external validity of samples. This essay discusses the relationship between sampling and external validity and provides a brief overview of important sampling concepts including power, the central limit theorem, nonprobability sampling and probability sampling. Sampling related biases are overviewed in the context of communication research. Finally, strategies that researchers and the discipline as a whole might adopt to ameliorate validity concerns related to sampling are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

抽样策略与外部效度直接相关。研究者在选择抽样框架和抽样参与者时所做的选择需要清楚地表达出来。抽样选择会在研究结果中引入各种偏差,从而降低样本的外部有效性。本文讨论了抽样与外部有效性的关系,并简要介绍了抽样的重要概念,包括幂、中心极限定理、非概率抽样和概率抽样。在传播研究的背景下,对抽样相关的偏差进行了概述。最后,提出了研究人员和学科作为一个整体可能采取的策略,以改善与抽样有关的效度问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sampling and validity
ABSTRACT Sampling strategies are directly related to external validity. The choices researchers make in selecting sampling frames and sampling participants need to be clearly articulated. Sampling choices can introduce a variety of biases into research findings that reduce the external validity of samples. This essay discusses the relationship between sampling and external validity and provides a brief overview of important sampling concepts including power, the central limit theorem, nonprobability sampling and probability sampling. Sampling related biases are overviewed in the context of communication research. Finally, strategies that researchers and the discipline as a whole might adopt to ameliorate validity concerns related to sampling are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Four decades of biological measurement advancing mediated communication theory: a review of literature from 1980–2020 What is ‘Being There’? an ontology of the immersive experience Relational turbulence during family transitions: a lifespan perspective and roadmap for future research An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration Mapping media literacy impact in the U.S.: a review of literature and call for equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1