Q2 Arts and Humanities Acta Linguistica Hafniensia Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/03740463.2021.1955320
L. Delsing
{"title":"Pronominal case in Västerbottnian","authors":"L. Delsing","doi":"10.1080/03740463.2021.1955320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I consider the use of seemingly old nominative forms (ONF) in object position. The phenomenon is noted for the dialects of Västerbotten (in Northern Sweden) by several authors. Earlier works imply that the phenomenon is rather recent (early 1900s) and that the phenomenon is in more common usage in the inland rural areas than by the more urban coast. I discuss the structural analysis presented by Holmberg in the 1980s, which involves a restriction on “subject forms” to noun phrases that are assigned Case and Theta role from different heads. I present both theoretical and empirical reasons to doubt that account. Instead, I opt for a phonological account, which claims that the ONFs are used, if and only if they are strong (stressed). The suggestion is corroborated by new data from a few informants. I end the paper by giving the details of case forms for strong and weak first- and second-person pronouns in the old and modern dialects. The modern dialect is claimed to have lost its strong object forms and now resorts to using the only available strong forms (ONFs) in both subject and object position.","PeriodicalId":35105,"journal":{"name":"Acta Linguistica Hafniensia","volume":"30 1","pages":"207 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Linguistica Hafniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.1955320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我考虑了在宾语位置上使用看似古老的主格形式(ONF)。这种现象被一些作者注意到Västerbotten(瑞典北部)的方言。早期的研究表明,这种现象是最近才出现的(20世纪初),而且这种现象在内陆农村地区比城市沿海地区更为普遍。我讨论了Holmberg在20世纪80年代提出的结构分析,其中包括对名词短语的“主语形式”的限制,这些短语从不同的头部分配了Case和Theta角色。我从理论和实证两方面提出质疑这一说法的理由。相反,我选择了一种音韵学解释,它声称当且仅当它们是强音(重读)时才会使用onf。这一建议得到了几个线人提供的新数据的证实。最后,我给出了古代和现代方言中强弱第一人称和第二人称代词的格形式的细节。现代方言声称已经失去了它的强宾语形式,现在求助于在主语和宾语位置上使用唯一可用的强形式(ONFs)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pronominal case in Västerbottnian
ABSTRACT In this article, I consider the use of seemingly old nominative forms (ONF) in object position. The phenomenon is noted for the dialects of Västerbotten (in Northern Sweden) by several authors. Earlier works imply that the phenomenon is rather recent (early 1900s) and that the phenomenon is in more common usage in the inland rural areas than by the more urban coast. I discuss the structural analysis presented by Holmberg in the 1980s, which involves a restriction on “subject forms” to noun phrases that are assigned Case and Theta role from different heads. I present both theoretical and empirical reasons to doubt that account. Instead, I opt for a phonological account, which claims that the ONFs are used, if and only if they are strong (stressed). The suggestion is corroborated by new data from a few informants. I end the paper by giving the details of case forms for strong and weak first- and second-person pronouns in the old and modern dialects. The modern dialect is claimed to have lost its strong object forms and now resorts to using the only available strong forms (ONFs) in both subject and object position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Boundary-crossing situations and the use of deictic verbs in Finnish and Estonian expressions of non-actual motion Are discourse-initial action-guiding verbless speech acts elliptical? Bulletin du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague 2023 The use of case forms in Modern Danish – an empirical study Schematicity vs. lexicality: typological differences between Danish and Spanish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1