不同阿拉伯文手写文字识别系统组合的框架

H. E. Abed, V. Märgner
{"title":"不同阿拉伯文手写文字识别系统组合的框架","authors":"H. E. Abed, V. Märgner","doi":"10.1109/ICPR.2010.469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present A Framework for the Combination of Different Arabic Handwritten Word Recognition Systems to achieve a decision with a higher performance. This performance can be expressed by lower rejection rates and higher recognition rates. The used methods range from voting schemes based on results of different recognizer to a neural network decision based on normalized confidences. This work presents an extension of the well known combination methods for a large lexicon, an extension from maximum 30 classes (e.g., 10 classes for digits classification) to 937 classes for the IfN/ENIT-database. In addition, different reject rules based on the evaluation and analysis of individual and combined systems output are discussed. Different threshold function for reject levels are tested and evaluated. Tests with a set of recognizer, which participated in the ICDAR 2007 competition and based on set coming from the IfN/ENIT-database show that a word error rate (WER) of 5.29% without reject and with a reject rate less than 25% even a word error rate of less than 1%.","PeriodicalId":74516,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition","volume":"14 1","pages":"1904-1907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for the Combination of Different Arabic Handwritten Word Recognition Systems\",\"authors\":\"H. E. Abed, V. Märgner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPR.2010.469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we present A Framework for the Combination of Different Arabic Handwritten Word Recognition Systems to achieve a decision with a higher performance. This performance can be expressed by lower rejection rates and higher recognition rates. The used methods range from voting schemes based on results of different recognizer to a neural network decision based on normalized confidences. This work presents an extension of the well known combination methods for a large lexicon, an extension from maximum 30 classes (e.g., 10 classes for digits classification) to 937 classes for the IfN/ENIT-database. In addition, different reject rules based on the evaluation and analysis of individual and combined systems output are discussed. Different threshold function for reject levels are tested and evaluated. Tests with a set of recognizer, which participated in the ICDAR 2007 competition and based on set coming from the IfN/ENIT-database show that a word error rate (WER) of 5.29% without reject and with a reject rate less than 25% even a word error rate of less than 1%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1904-1907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. International Conference on Pattern Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2010.469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种结合不同阿拉伯语手写词识别系统的框架,以实现具有更高性能的决策。这种性能可以通过更低的拒绝率和更高的识别率来表达。使用的方法从基于不同识别器结果的投票方案到基于归一化置信度的神经网络决策。这项工作提出了一个众所周知的大型词典组合方法的扩展,从最多30个类(例如,10个类用于数字分类)扩展到IfN/ enit数据库的937个类。此外,还讨论了基于对单个系统和组合系统输出的评价和分析的不同拒绝规则。测试和评估了不同的拒绝水平阈值函数。使用参加ICDAR 2007竞赛的识别器集和IfN/ enit数据库的识别器集进行测试,结果表明,在不拒收的情况下,单词错误率(WER)为5.29%,在拒收率小于25%的情况下,单词错误率小于1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Framework for the Combination of Different Arabic Handwritten Word Recognition Systems
In this paper we present A Framework for the Combination of Different Arabic Handwritten Word Recognition Systems to achieve a decision with a higher performance. This performance can be expressed by lower rejection rates and higher recognition rates. The used methods range from voting schemes based on results of different recognizer to a neural network decision based on normalized confidences. This work presents an extension of the well known combination methods for a large lexicon, an extension from maximum 30 classes (e.g., 10 classes for digits classification) to 937 classes for the IfN/ENIT-database. In addition, different reject rules based on the evaluation and analysis of individual and combined systems output are discussed. Different threshold function for reject levels are tested and evaluated. Tests with a set of recognizer, which participated in the ICDAR 2007 competition and based on set coming from the IfN/ENIT-database show that a word error rate (WER) of 5.29% without reject and with a reject rate less than 25% even a word error rate of less than 1%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complexity of Representations in Deep Learning Extraction of Ruler Markings For Estimating Physical Size of Oral Lesions. TensorMixup Data Augmentation Method for Fully Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Classifying Breast Histopathology Images with a Ductal Instance-Oriented Pipeline. Directionally Paired Principal Component Analysis for Bivariate Estimation Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1