切萨皮克湾支流波托马克河和拉帕汉诺克河潮汐沼泽的晚全新世沉积和古环境史

N. Tibert, J. B. Hubeny, M. Abbott, J. M. Kiker, L. Walker, S. McKenzie
{"title":"切萨皮克湾支流波托马克河和拉帕汉诺克河潮汐沼泽的晚全新世沉积和古环境史","authors":"N. Tibert, J. B. Hubeny, M. Abbott, J. M. Kiker, L. Walker, S. McKenzie","doi":"10.25778/D2GV-6S53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instrumental tide gauge records indicate that the modern rates of sea-level rise in the Chesapeake Bay more than double the global average of 1.2-1.5 mm yr-1. The primary objective for this study is to establish a relative depositional history for the tidal marshes of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers that will help us improve our understanding of processes that influence sedimentation in the proximal tributaries of Chesapeake Bay. Marsh cores were collected from Blandfield Point VA, Tappahannock VA, and Potomac Creek VA. The sedimentary facies include: 1) a lower unit of organic-poor, grey clay with fine sand and silt layers and estuarine foraminifera; and 2) an upper unit of organic-rich clay and peat with abundant brackish to freshwater marsh foraminifera and thecamoebians. AMS 14C dating of bulk marsh sediments yield sedimentation rates at Potomac Creek ranging from 3.04-4.20 mm yr-1 for the past 2500 years. Rates of sedimentation calculated for Blandfield Point indicate 1.37-2.19 mm yr-1 in the basal clays and peat for the past ~3000 years. Foraminiferal census counts indicate a freshening upward trend with a transition from an estuarine Ammobaculites crassus assemblage to a marsh Ammoastuta salsa assemblage with abundant freshwater Thecamoebians. The late Holocene history of sedimentation for the marshes indicates that differential compaction, recent land use practices, and climate change have contributed to the resultant freshening-upward environmental trend and variability in sediment accumulation rates between coring sites. Corresponding author: Neil E. Tibert ntibert@umw.edu 92 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE INTRODUCTION The Chesapeake Bay watershed comprises numerous tributaries draining from the eastern Appalachian Mountains. The central axis to the Chesapeake has been evaluated in the context of decadal, centennial, and millennial climate changes (Cronin and others 2005, 2010). In the historic Northern Neck region of Virginia, the tidal reaches of the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers (Fig. 1) have received little detailed study with respect to the nature of the sedimentary record spanning the past several thousand years. Recent estimates for eustatic sea level are estimated to be as high as 1.5-1.88 mm yr (Church and White 2006, Nerem and others 2006) whereas the instrumental tidal -1 FIGURE 1. Location map for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. Table1 lists the coordinates and detailed coring information for Sites A-C. Table 2 list coordinates and details for the tide gauge stations (Sites 1-4). Inset shows our location along the eastern Atlantic coast of the USA. Late Holocene Sedimentation 93 records from the Chesapeake Bay indicate rates as high as ~3-4 mm yr (Boon 2012). -1 The disparity between global and regional base level change in the Chesapeake Bay is not well understood and likely reflects the combined effects of allogenic, autogenic, and anthropogenic processes in the region (Cronin 2012). The primary objective for this paper is to establish a late Holocene sedimentation and paleoenvironmental history for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers in the Northern Neck region of Virginia, USA. Our primary analytical tools include physical stratigraphy (loss on ignition, grain size, and magnetic susceptibility), foraminiferal paleoecology, and AMS C geochronology applied to cores collected from the central estuarine region of the 14 tidal Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. BACKGROUND The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the United States, with shores bordering the states of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The watershed area of this coastal plain estuary is 167,000 km that includes the following major 2 tributaries: Susquehanna, Potomac, Rappahannock, York, and James Rivers (Boesh and others 2001). The Chesapeake Bay is the product of Holocene sea-level rise formed by fluvial incision coupled with the inundation of river valleys following the terminus of the last glacial maximum (Schubel and Pritchard 1986). The Chesapeake Bay is located in an apparently inactive tectonic region on the North American passive margin. However, many Cretaceous age faults have been identified in close proximity to our localities in the Fredericksburg, VA (Table 1) which marks the transition from the Piedmont region (west) to the coastal plain (east) in Virginia (Fig. 1) (Berquist and Bailey 1999). Lower Tertiary sedimentary deposits in the region include fine-to coarse glauconitic quartz sand and clay-silt of the Lower Tertiary Pamunkey Group (Brightseat, Aquia, Marlboro, Nanjemoy, and Piney Point formations) (Mixon and others 1989). TABLE 1. List of sampling localities from the Potomac and Rappahannock tidewater region of Virginia and Maryland. Site Location Longitude Latitude Geographic Info Site A Blandfield Point VA 76°54'40.436\"W 38°0'6.911\"N Blandfield Marsh on Rappahannock River (proximal estuarine zone 0-5 ppt) Site B Tappahannock Harbor VA 76°51'15.368\"W 37°55'16.723\"N Coleman's Island, Hoskin's Creek tributary to Rappahannock River (distal tributary to central estuarine zone) Site C Potomac Creek VA 77°20'7.619\"W 38°21'6.972\"N Potomac Creek tributary to Potomac River (central estuarine zone 5-15 ppt) 94 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE During the past several decades, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, 2009) has maintained tidal gauging stations at Colonial Beach and Washington DC (Table 1). The sea level rates calculated from the instrumental records on the Potomac River range from 3.16-4.78 mm yr from Washington DC and -1 Colonial Beach respectively (Table 2), which are significantly higher than eustatic values of 1.0-1.5 mm yr (Table 2) (NOAA 2009; Boon 2012). The instrumental -1 records from the lower Rappahannock at Sewell’s point record a relative sea-level rise of 4.44 mm yr spanning the past 84 years. -1 Cronin and others (2000, 2005, and 2010) and Cronin and Vann (2003) reported microfossils from cores (~2-6 m in thickness) located at the mouths of the major tributaries in the central regions of the bay (e.g., Patuxent, Choptank, and the Potomac Rivers). Willard and others (2003) and Cronin and others (2003) reported a highresolution historical microfossil record that apparently discriminates important anthropogenic events such as the Medieval Warm Period and deforestation of the bay region with the arrival of European settlers. METHODS Marsh cores were collected from the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers that includes Blandfield Point (Site A), Tappahannock Harbor (Site B), and Potomac Creek (Site C) (Table 1) (Fig. 1). A square-rod piston coring device was used to collect continuous 1-meter long core drives down a single coring hole (Wright 1967). Individual core sections were split along a longitudinal axis to produce two equal halves. Potomac Creek cores were evaluated for microfossils at 10 cm intervals. Approximately eighty 1cm sediment samples were soaked in a beaker of warm water 3 and mild detergent to disperse the clays (Scott and Leckie 1990). Samples were rinsed over a 63 μm sieved and picked wet using conventional microfossil methods (Scott and Medioli 1980). Each sample was then examined for foraminifera and relative abundances were calculated for species and select genera to simplify the trends. Exceptionally preserved specimens were examined on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for identification and illustration purposes. TABLE 2. Tidal gauge data for the Chesapeake Bay (NOAA, 2009). Locality Instrumental Records SL Rate mm yr-1 YBP Tidal Station & Data Set Info NOAA Monthly Mean 1 Washington DC 3.16+0.35 87 8594900 (1924-2006) 2 Colonial Beach VA 4.78+1.21 39 8635150 (1972-2003) 3 Sewells Point VA 4.44+0.27 84 8638610 (1927-2006) 4 Solomons Island MD 3..41+0.29 74 8577330 (1937-2006) x Global average 1.5+0.5 0 Late Holocene Sedimentation 95 The total organic matter (TOM) was determined by using loss on ignition (LOI) (Dean 1974). Grain size analyses were conducted using methods modified from McManus (1988). Volume magnetic susceptibility was conducted on sediments using a Bartington MS2E surface scanner following the method of split-core logging of Last and Smol (2001). Select bulk sediment samples were pretreated for radiocarbon dating at the University of Pittsburgh following the methods outlined by Abbott and Stafford (1996). AMS C analyses were performed at the University of Arizona’s Accelerator 14 Mass Spectrometry Laboratory and the dates calibrated using Calib 6.1.0 (Reimer and others 2009). RESULTS Sedimentary Facies Grey Clay Facies: The basal sediments at all coring sites comprise clay and sparse interbeds of silt and sand (Fig. 2). The grey clay facies ranges in thickness from ~7.54.25 m at Potomac Creek to ~5.5-2.5 at Tappahannock Harbor (Fig. 2). TOM values in the organic-rich clay range from ~8-28%. Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with positive excursion peaks in the silt-rich layers. Grain size analyses at Tappahannock Harbor indicate a coarsening-up trend from mud-to-silt and fine sand (Fig. 2). Foraminifera in the organic-rich grey clay are dominated by Trochammina inflata, and Ammobaculites spp. in association with sparse Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. (Fig. 3). Peat & Clay Facies: All cores contain an upper unit of alternating peat and grey clay with TOM values that range from ~20% to 85% (Fig. 2). Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with little variability. Microfossil populations in this facies are dominated by Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. Trochammina inflata and Jadaminna macrescens are also common while Haplophragmoides is the least abundant (Fig. 3). Sedimentary cores from Blandfield Marsh and Potomac Creek (Fig. 2) are capped with an uppermost rooted zone of the grass Phragmites and the freshwater thecamoebian Arcellacea sp. (Figs. 2, 3). Core Chronology & Sedimentation Rates Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) C dat","PeriodicalId":23516,"journal":{"name":"Virginia journal of science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Holocene Sedimentation and Paleoenvironmental History for the Tidal Marshes of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers, Tributaries to Chesapeake Bay\",\"authors\":\"N. Tibert, J. B. Hubeny, M. Abbott, J. M. Kiker, L. Walker, S. McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.25778/D2GV-6S53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instrumental tide gauge records indicate that the modern rates of sea-level rise in the Chesapeake Bay more than double the global average of 1.2-1.5 mm yr-1. The primary objective for this study is to establish a relative depositional history for the tidal marshes of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers that will help us improve our understanding of processes that influence sedimentation in the proximal tributaries of Chesapeake Bay. Marsh cores were collected from Blandfield Point VA, Tappahannock VA, and Potomac Creek VA. The sedimentary facies include: 1) a lower unit of organic-poor, grey clay with fine sand and silt layers and estuarine foraminifera; and 2) an upper unit of organic-rich clay and peat with abundant brackish to freshwater marsh foraminifera and thecamoebians. AMS 14C dating of bulk marsh sediments yield sedimentation rates at Potomac Creek ranging from 3.04-4.20 mm yr-1 for the past 2500 years. Rates of sedimentation calculated for Blandfield Point indicate 1.37-2.19 mm yr-1 in the basal clays and peat for the past ~3000 years. Foraminiferal census counts indicate a freshening upward trend with a transition from an estuarine Ammobaculites crassus assemblage to a marsh Ammoastuta salsa assemblage with abundant freshwater Thecamoebians. The late Holocene history of sedimentation for the marshes indicates that differential compaction, recent land use practices, and climate change have contributed to the resultant freshening-upward environmental trend and variability in sediment accumulation rates between coring sites. Corresponding author: Neil E. Tibert ntibert@umw.edu 92 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE INTRODUCTION The Chesapeake Bay watershed comprises numerous tributaries draining from the eastern Appalachian Mountains. The central axis to the Chesapeake has been evaluated in the context of decadal, centennial, and millennial climate changes (Cronin and others 2005, 2010). In the historic Northern Neck region of Virginia, the tidal reaches of the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers (Fig. 1) have received little detailed study with respect to the nature of the sedimentary record spanning the past several thousand years. Recent estimates for eustatic sea level are estimated to be as high as 1.5-1.88 mm yr (Church and White 2006, Nerem and others 2006) whereas the instrumental tidal -1 FIGURE 1. Location map for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. Table1 lists the coordinates and detailed coring information for Sites A-C. Table 2 list coordinates and details for the tide gauge stations (Sites 1-4). Inset shows our location along the eastern Atlantic coast of the USA. Late Holocene Sedimentation 93 records from the Chesapeake Bay indicate rates as high as ~3-4 mm yr (Boon 2012). -1 The disparity between global and regional base level change in the Chesapeake Bay is not well understood and likely reflects the combined effects of allogenic, autogenic, and anthropogenic processes in the region (Cronin 2012). The primary objective for this paper is to establish a late Holocene sedimentation and paleoenvironmental history for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers in the Northern Neck region of Virginia, USA. Our primary analytical tools include physical stratigraphy (loss on ignition, grain size, and magnetic susceptibility), foraminiferal paleoecology, and AMS C geochronology applied to cores collected from the central estuarine region of the 14 tidal Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. BACKGROUND The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the United States, with shores bordering the states of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The watershed area of this coastal plain estuary is 167,000 km that includes the following major 2 tributaries: Susquehanna, Potomac, Rappahannock, York, and James Rivers (Boesh and others 2001). The Chesapeake Bay is the product of Holocene sea-level rise formed by fluvial incision coupled with the inundation of river valleys following the terminus of the last glacial maximum (Schubel and Pritchard 1986). The Chesapeake Bay is located in an apparently inactive tectonic region on the North American passive margin. However, many Cretaceous age faults have been identified in close proximity to our localities in the Fredericksburg, VA (Table 1) which marks the transition from the Piedmont region (west) to the coastal plain (east) in Virginia (Fig. 1) (Berquist and Bailey 1999). Lower Tertiary sedimentary deposits in the region include fine-to coarse glauconitic quartz sand and clay-silt of the Lower Tertiary Pamunkey Group (Brightseat, Aquia, Marlboro, Nanjemoy, and Piney Point formations) (Mixon and others 1989). TABLE 1. List of sampling localities from the Potomac and Rappahannock tidewater region of Virginia and Maryland. Site Location Longitude Latitude Geographic Info Site A Blandfield Point VA 76°54'40.436\\\"W 38°0'6.911\\\"N Blandfield Marsh on Rappahannock River (proximal estuarine zone 0-5 ppt) Site B Tappahannock Harbor VA 76°51'15.368\\\"W 37°55'16.723\\\"N Coleman's Island, Hoskin's Creek tributary to Rappahannock River (distal tributary to central estuarine zone) Site C Potomac Creek VA 77°20'7.619\\\"W 38°21'6.972\\\"N Potomac Creek tributary to Potomac River (central estuarine zone 5-15 ppt) 94 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE During the past several decades, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, 2009) has maintained tidal gauging stations at Colonial Beach and Washington DC (Table 1). The sea level rates calculated from the instrumental records on the Potomac River range from 3.16-4.78 mm yr from Washington DC and -1 Colonial Beach respectively (Table 2), which are significantly higher than eustatic values of 1.0-1.5 mm yr (Table 2) (NOAA 2009; Boon 2012). The instrumental -1 records from the lower Rappahannock at Sewell’s point record a relative sea-level rise of 4.44 mm yr spanning the past 84 years. -1 Cronin and others (2000, 2005, and 2010) and Cronin and Vann (2003) reported microfossils from cores (~2-6 m in thickness) located at the mouths of the major tributaries in the central regions of the bay (e.g., Patuxent, Choptank, and the Potomac Rivers). Willard and others (2003) and Cronin and others (2003) reported a highresolution historical microfossil record that apparently discriminates important anthropogenic events such as the Medieval Warm Period and deforestation of the bay region with the arrival of European settlers. METHODS Marsh cores were collected from the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers that includes Blandfield Point (Site A), Tappahannock Harbor (Site B), and Potomac Creek (Site C) (Table 1) (Fig. 1). A square-rod piston coring device was used to collect continuous 1-meter long core drives down a single coring hole (Wright 1967). Individual core sections were split along a longitudinal axis to produce two equal halves. Potomac Creek cores were evaluated for microfossils at 10 cm intervals. Approximately eighty 1cm sediment samples were soaked in a beaker of warm water 3 and mild detergent to disperse the clays (Scott and Leckie 1990). Samples were rinsed over a 63 μm sieved and picked wet using conventional microfossil methods (Scott and Medioli 1980). Each sample was then examined for foraminifera and relative abundances were calculated for species and select genera to simplify the trends. Exceptionally preserved specimens were examined on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for identification and illustration purposes. TABLE 2. Tidal gauge data for the Chesapeake Bay (NOAA, 2009). Locality Instrumental Records SL Rate mm yr-1 YBP Tidal Station & Data Set Info NOAA Monthly Mean 1 Washington DC 3.16+0.35 87 8594900 (1924-2006) 2 Colonial Beach VA 4.78+1.21 39 8635150 (1972-2003) 3 Sewells Point VA 4.44+0.27 84 8638610 (1927-2006) 4 Solomons Island MD 3..41+0.29 74 8577330 (1937-2006) x Global average 1.5+0.5 0 Late Holocene Sedimentation 95 The total organic matter (TOM) was determined by using loss on ignition (LOI) (Dean 1974). Grain size analyses were conducted using methods modified from McManus (1988). Volume magnetic susceptibility was conducted on sediments using a Bartington MS2E surface scanner following the method of split-core logging of Last and Smol (2001). Select bulk sediment samples were pretreated for radiocarbon dating at the University of Pittsburgh following the methods outlined by Abbott and Stafford (1996). AMS C analyses were performed at the University of Arizona’s Accelerator 14 Mass Spectrometry Laboratory and the dates calibrated using Calib 6.1.0 (Reimer and others 2009). RESULTS Sedimentary Facies Grey Clay Facies: The basal sediments at all coring sites comprise clay and sparse interbeds of silt and sand (Fig. 2). The grey clay facies ranges in thickness from ~7.54.25 m at Potomac Creek to ~5.5-2.5 at Tappahannock Harbor (Fig. 2). TOM values in the organic-rich clay range from ~8-28%. Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with positive excursion peaks in the silt-rich layers. Grain size analyses at Tappahannock Harbor indicate a coarsening-up trend from mud-to-silt and fine sand (Fig. 2). Foraminifera in the organic-rich grey clay are dominated by Trochammina inflata, and Ammobaculites spp. in association with sparse Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. (Fig. 3). Peat & Clay Facies: All cores contain an upper unit of alternating peat and grey clay with TOM values that range from ~20% to 85% (Fig. 2). Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with little variability. Microfossil populations in this facies are dominated by Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. Trochammina inflata and Jadaminna macrescens are also common while Haplophragmoides is the least abundant (Fig. 3). Sedimentary cores from Blandfield Marsh and Potomac Creek (Fig. 2) are capped with an uppermost rooted zone of the grass Phragmites and the freshwater thecamoebian Arcellacea sp. (Figs. 2, 3). Core Chronology & Sedimentation Rates Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) C dat\",\"PeriodicalId\":23516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25778/D2GV-6S53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia journal of science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25778/D2GV-6S53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

911”拉帕汉诺克河上的布兰菲尔德沼泽(近河口区0-5 ppt) B点塔帕汉诺克港VA 76°51′15.368”W 37°55′16.723”科尔曼岛,霍斯金河支流拉帕汉诺克河(远河口区中央支流)C点波托马克河VA 77°20′7.619”W 38°21′6.972”波托马克河支流波托马克河(中央河口区5-15 ppt) 94弗吉尼亚科学杂志2009年)维持了殖民地海滩和华盛顿特区的潮汐测量站(表1)。根据波托马克河上的仪器记录计算出的海平面率在华盛顿特区和-1殖民地海滩分别为3.16-4.78毫米/年(表2),明显高于1.0-1.5毫米/年的上升值(表2)(NOAA 2009;恩2012)。休厄尔点拉帕汉诺克底部的仪器-1记录显示,在过去84年里,海平面每年相对上升4.44毫米。- Cronin等人(2000年、2005年和2010年)和Cronin和Vann(2003年)报告了位于海湾中心地区主要支流(如Patuxent、Choptank和Potomac河)河口的岩心(厚度约2-6米)的微化石。Willard等人(2003)和Cronin等人(2003)报告了高分辨率的历史微化石记录,该记录明显区分了重要的人为事件,如中世纪温暖期和海湾地区的森林砍伐与欧洲定居者的到来。方法从Rappahannock和Potomac河流中收集沼泽岩心,包括Blandfield Point (A点)、Tappahannock Harbor (B点)和Potomac Creek (C点)(图1)(表1)。使用方形杆活塞取心装置在单个取心孔中收集连续的1米长的取心(Wright 1967)。单个核心部分沿着纵轴分开,产生两个相等的部分。Potomac Creek岩心每隔10 cm进行微化石评价。将大约80个1厘米长的沉积物样本浸泡在装有温水和温和清洁剂的烧杯中,以分散粘土(Scott和Leckie 1990)。使用传统的微化石方法(Scott and Medioli 1980),在63 μm筛网上冲洗样品,并进行湿取样。然后对每个样本进行有孔虫检查,并计算物种和选择属的相对丰度,以简化趋势。特别保存的标本在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)上进行了检查,以进行鉴定和说明。表2。切萨皮克湾潮汐测量数据(NOAA, 2009)。地点仪器记录SL速率mm -1 YBP潮汐站和数据集信息NOAA月平均1华盛顿特区3.16+0.35 87 8594900(1924-2006)2殖民海滩VA 4.78+1.21 39 8635150 (1972-2003) 3 Sewells Point VA 4.44+0.27 84 8638610(1927-2006) 4所罗门岛MD 3. 41+0.29 74 8577330 (1937-2006) x全球平均1.5+0.5 0晚全新世沉积95总有机质(TOM)是通过使用燃烧损失(LOI) (Dean 1974)确定的。采用McManus(1988)改进的方法进行粒度分析。根据Last和Smol(2001)的裂心测井方法,使用barington MS2E表面扫描仪对沉积物进行了体积磁化率分析。根据Abbott和Stafford(1996)概述的方法,在匹兹堡大学对选定的大块沉积物样品进行了放射性碳定年预处理。AMS C分析在亚利桑那大学的加速器14质谱实验室进行,使用Calib 6.1.0校准日期(Reimer等人2009)。灰色粘土相:所有取心点的底质沉积物均由粘土和稀疏的粉砂互层组成(图2)。灰色粘土相的厚度范围从Potomac Creek的~7.54.25 m到Tappahannock Harbor的~5.5-2.5 m(图2)。富有机质粘土的TOM值范围为~8-28%。磁化率值相对较低,在富粉层中有正偏移峰。Tappahannock港的粒度分析表明,从泥质到粉质和细砂呈粗化趋势(图2)。富有机质灰色粘土中的有孔虫以Trochammina inflata和Ammobaculites sp.为主,并伴有稀疏的Ammoastuta salsa和Miliammina fusca。(图3)泥炭和粘土相:所有岩心都包含上部泥炭和灰粘土交替单元,其TOM值在~20%到85%之间(图2)。磁化率值相对较低,变化不大。该相微化石居群以砂藻(Ammoastuta salsa)和褐藻(milammina fusca)为主。Trochammina inflata和Jadaminna macrescens也很常见,而Haplophragmoides的数量最少(图3)。 2)被禾草芦苇和淡水变形虫Arcellacea sp.的最上层根区覆盖(图2、3)。岩心年代学和沉积速率加速器质谱(AMS) C数据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Late Holocene Sedimentation and Paleoenvironmental History for the Tidal Marshes of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers, Tributaries to Chesapeake Bay
Instrumental tide gauge records indicate that the modern rates of sea-level rise in the Chesapeake Bay more than double the global average of 1.2-1.5 mm yr-1. The primary objective for this study is to establish a relative depositional history for the tidal marshes of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers that will help us improve our understanding of processes that influence sedimentation in the proximal tributaries of Chesapeake Bay. Marsh cores were collected from Blandfield Point VA, Tappahannock VA, and Potomac Creek VA. The sedimentary facies include: 1) a lower unit of organic-poor, grey clay with fine sand and silt layers and estuarine foraminifera; and 2) an upper unit of organic-rich clay and peat with abundant brackish to freshwater marsh foraminifera and thecamoebians. AMS 14C dating of bulk marsh sediments yield sedimentation rates at Potomac Creek ranging from 3.04-4.20 mm yr-1 for the past 2500 years. Rates of sedimentation calculated for Blandfield Point indicate 1.37-2.19 mm yr-1 in the basal clays and peat for the past ~3000 years. Foraminiferal census counts indicate a freshening upward trend with a transition from an estuarine Ammobaculites crassus assemblage to a marsh Ammoastuta salsa assemblage with abundant freshwater Thecamoebians. The late Holocene history of sedimentation for the marshes indicates that differential compaction, recent land use practices, and climate change have contributed to the resultant freshening-upward environmental trend and variability in sediment accumulation rates between coring sites. Corresponding author: Neil E. Tibert ntibert@umw.edu 92 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE INTRODUCTION The Chesapeake Bay watershed comprises numerous tributaries draining from the eastern Appalachian Mountains. The central axis to the Chesapeake has been evaluated in the context of decadal, centennial, and millennial climate changes (Cronin and others 2005, 2010). In the historic Northern Neck region of Virginia, the tidal reaches of the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers (Fig. 1) have received little detailed study with respect to the nature of the sedimentary record spanning the past several thousand years. Recent estimates for eustatic sea level are estimated to be as high as 1.5-1.88 mm yr (Church and White 2006, Nerem and others 2006) whereas the instrumental tidal -1 FIGURE 1. Location map for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. Table1 lists the coordinates and detailed coring information for Sites A-C. Table 2 list coordinates and details for the tide gauge stations (Sites 1-4). Inset shows our location along the eastern Atlantic coast of the USA. Late Holocene Sedimentation 93 records from the Chesapeake Bay indicate rates as high as ~3-4 mm yr (Boon 2012). -1 The disparity between global and regional base level change in the Chesapeake Bay is not well understood and likely reflects the combined effects of allogenic, autogenic, and anthropogenic processes in the region (Cronin 2012). The primary objective for this paper is to establish a late Holocene sedimentation and paleoenvironmental history for the tidal reaches of the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers in the Northern Neck region of Virginia, USA. Our primary analytical tools include physical stratigraphy (loss on ignition, grain size, and magnetic susceptibility), foraminiferal paleoecology, and AMS C geochronology applied to cores collected from the central estuarine region of the 14 tidal Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers. BACKGROUND The Chesapeake Bay is the largest estuary in the United States, with shores bordering the states of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. The watershed area of this coastal plain estuary is 167,000 km that includes the following major 2 tributaries: Susquehanna, Potomac, Rappahannock, York, and James Rivers (Boesh and others 2001). The Chesapeake Bay is the product of Holocene sea-level rise formed by fluvial incision coupled with the inundation of river valleys following the terminus of the last glacial maximum (Schubel and Pritchard 1986). The Chesapeake Bay is located in an apparently inactive tectonic region on the North American passive margin. However, many Cretaceous age faults have been identified in close proximity to our localities in the Fredericksburg, VA (Table 1) which marks the transition from the Piedmont region (west) to the coastal plain (east) in Virginia (Fig. 1) (Berquist and Bailey 1999). Lower Tertiary sedimentary deposits in the region include fine-to coarse glauconitic quartz sand and clay-silt of the Lower Tertiary Pamunkey Group (Brightseat, Aquia, Marlboro, Nanjemoy, and Piney Point formations) (Mixon and others 1989). TABLE 1. List of sampling localities from the Potomac and Rappahannock tidewater region of Virginia and Maryland. Site Location Longitude Latitude Geographic Info Site A Blandfield Point VA 76°54'40.436"W 38°0'6.911"N Blandfield Marsh on Rappahannock River (proximal estuarine zone 0-5 ppt) Site B Tappahannock Harbor VA 76°51'15.368"W 37°55'16.723"N Coleman's Island, Hoskin's Creek tributary to Rappahannock River (distal tributary to central estuarine zone) Site C Potomac Creek VA 77°20'7.619"W 38°21'6.972"N Potomac Creek tributary to Potomac River (central estuarine zone 5-15 ppt) 94 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE During the past several decades, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, 2009) has maintained tidal gauging stations at Colonial Beach and Washington DC (Table 1). The sea level rates calculated from the instrumental records on the Potomac River range from 3.16-4.78 mm yr from Washington DC and -1 Colonial Beach respectively (Table 2), which are significantly higher than eustatic values of 1.0-1.5 mm yr (Table 2) (NOAA 2009; Boon 2012). The instrumental -1 records from the lower Rappahannock at Sewell’s point record a relative sea-level rise of 4.44 mm yr spanning the past 84 years. -1 Cronin and others (2000, 2005, and 2010) and Cronin and Vann (2003) reported microfossils from cores (~2-6 m in thickness) located at the mouths of the major tributaries in the central regions of the bay (e.g., Patuxent, Choptank, and the Potomac Rivers). Willard and others (2003) and Cronin and others (2003) reported a highresolution historical microfossil record that apparently discriminates important anthropogenic events such as the Medieval Warm Period and deforestation of the bay region with the arrival of European settlers. METHODS Marsh cores were collected from the Rappahannock and Potomac Rivers that includes Blandfield Point (Site A), Tappahannock Harbor (Site B), and Potomac Creek (Site C) (Table 1) (Fig. 1). A square-rod piston coring device was used to collect continuous 1-meter long core drives down a single coring hole (Wright 1967). Individual core sections were split along a longitudinal axis to produce two equal halves. Potomac Creek cores were evaluated for microfossils at 10 cm intervals. Approximately eighty 1cm sediment samples were soaked in a beaker of warm water 3 and mild detergent to disperse the clays (Scott and Leckie 1990). Samples were rinsed over a 63 μm sieved and picked wet using conventional microfossil methods (Scott and Medioli 1980). Each sample was then examined for foraminifera and relative abundances were calculated for species and select genera to simplify the trends. Exceptionally preserved specimens were examined on the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for identification and illustration purposes. TABLE 2. Tidal gauge data for the Chesapeake Bay (NOAA, 2009). Locality Instrumental Records SL Rate mm yr-1 YBP Tidal Station & Data Set Info NOAA Monthly Mean 1 Washington DC 3.16+0.35 87 8594900 (1924-2006) 2 Colonial Beach VA 4.78+1.21 39 8635150 (1972-2003) 3 Sewells Point VA 4.44+0.27 84 8638610 (1927-2006) 4 Solomons Island MD 3..41+0.29 74 8577330 (1937-2006) x Global average 1.5+0.5 0 Late Holocene Sedimentation 95 The total organic matter (TOM) was determined by using loss on ignition (LOI) (Dean 1974). Grain size analyses were conducted using methods modified from McManus (1988). Volume magnetic susceptibility was conducted on sediments using a Bartington MS2E surface scanner following the method of split-core logging of Last and Smol (2001). Select bulk sediment samples were pretreated for radiocarbon dating at the University of Pittsburgh following the methods outlined by Abbott and Stafford (1996). AMS C analyses were performed at the University of Arizona’s Accelerator 14 Mass Spectrometry Laboratory and the dates calibrated using Calib 6.1.0 (Reimer and others 2009). RESULTS Sedimentary Facies Grey Clay Facies: The basal sediments at all coring sites comprise clay and sparse interbeds of silt and sand (Fig. 2). The grey clay facies ranges in thickness from ~7.54.25 m at Potomac Creek to ~5.5-2.5 at Tappahannock Harbor (Fig. 2). TOM values in the organic-rich clay range from ~8-28%. Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with positive excursion peaks in the silt-rich layers. Grain size analyses at Tappahannock Harbor indicate a coarsening-up trend from mud-to-silt and fine sand (Fig. 2). Foraminifera in the organic-rich grey clay are dominated by Trochammina inflata, and Ammobaculites spp. in association with sparse Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. (Fig. 3). Peat & Clay Facies: All cores contain an upper unit of alternating peat and grey clay with TOM values that range from ~20% to 85% (Fig. 2). Magnetic susceptibility values are relatively low with little variability. Microfossil populations in this facies are dominated by Ammoastuta salsa and Miliammina fusca. Trochammina inflata and Jadaminna macrescens are also common while Haplophragmoides is the least abundant (Fig. 3). Sedimentary cores from Blandfield Marsh and Potomac Creek (Fig. 2) are capped with an uppermost rooted zone of the grass Phragmites and the freshwater thecamoebian Arcellacea sp. (Figs. 2, 3). Core Chronology & Sedimentation Rates Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) C dat
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Habitat Partitioning and Associated Morphological Differences Among Three Species of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) in the South Fork Roanoke River, Virginia Estimated 2020 CO2 Emission Reductions in Virginia’s Transportation Sector from COVID-19 Identification of Planktothrix (Cyanobacteria) Blooms and Effects on the Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community in the Non-Tidal Potomac River, USA A Survey on Securing Personally Identifiable Information on Smartphones Central Administration of Agouti-Related Peptide Increases Food Intake in Japanese Quail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1