用传统的评分法和coh -矩阵评价英语学生的作文

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105
Monica Kristin Mahadini, Endang Setyaningsih, Teguh Sarosa
{"title":"用传统的评分法和coh -矩阵评价英语学生的作文","authors":"Monica Kristin Mahadini, Endang Setyaningsih, Teguh Sarosa","doi":"10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional scoring rubric has been used as a tool to assess students’ writing for years and recently there is growing attention on the use of automated assessment tools. While studies highlighting the use of the tools per se are numerous, not much is available on the use of the combined tools. This study addresses the gap by examining 20 university EFL students’ essays using both assessment tools. The essays were examined based on a conventional rubric which contains five aspects and two categories covering eleven indices of an automated tool called Coh-Metrix. The results of the examination were interpreted and information generated from the tools are compared. The study reveals that the use of both conventional and automated tools laid a more comprehensive picture of the students’ essays.  The results of the assessment are useful to inform students and teachers on areas that need attention in the writing instruction.  Gain and loss on the use of the tools are explained.","PeriodicalId":40801,"journal":{"name":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Conventional Rubric and Coh-Metrix to Assess EFL Students’ Essays\",\"authors\":\"Monica Kristin Mahadini, Endang Setyaningsih, Teguh Sarosa\",\"doi\":\"10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conventional scoring rubric has been used as a tool to assess students’ writing for years and recently there is growing attention on the use of automated assessment tools. While studies highlighting the use of the tools per se are numerous, not much is available on the use of the combined tools. This study addresses the gap by examining 20 university EFL students’ essays using both assessment tools. The essays were examined based on a conventional rubric which contains five aspects and two categories covering eleven indices of an automated tool called Coh-Metrix. The results of the examination were interpreted and information generated from the tools are compared. The study reveals that the use of both conventional and automated tools laid a more comprehensive picture of the students’ essays.  The results of the assessment are useful to inform students and teachers on areas that need attention in the writing instruction.  Gain and loss on the use of the tools are explained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJoLE-International Journal of Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传统的评分标准多年来一直被用作评估学生写作的工具,最近人们越来越关注自动评估工具的使用。虽然强调工具本身的使用的研究有很多,但关于组合工具的使用的研究并不多。本研究通过使用这两种评估工具检查20名大学英语学生的论文来解决这一差距。这些文章是基于一个传统的标题,其中包含五个方面和两个类别,涵盖了一个名为Coh-Metrix的自动化工具的十一个指标。对检查结果进行解释,并对工具产生的信息进行比较。该研究表明,传统和自动化工具的使用为学生的论文提供了更全面的画面。评估的结果有助于告知学生和老师在写作指导中需要注意的地方。说明了工具使用的得失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Conventional Rubric and Coh-Metrix to Assess EFL Students’ Essays
The conventional scoring rubric has been used as a tool to assess students’ writing for years and recently there is growing attention on the use of automated assessment tools. While studies highlighting the use of the tools per se are numerous, not much is available on the use of the combined tools. This study addresses the gap by examining 20 university EFL students’ essays using both assessment tools. The essays were examined based on a conventional rubric which contains five aspects and two categories covering eleven indices of an automated tool called Coh-Metrix. The results of the examination were interpreted and information generated from the tools are compared. The study reveals that the use of both conventional and automated tools laid a more comprehensive picture of the students’ essays.  The results of the assessment are useful to inform students and teachers on areas that need attention in the writing instruction.  Gain and loss on the use of the tools are explained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Writing Knowledge and Writing Performance of Undergraduate Students The Impact of English Educational Tourism on the Growth of Local Economy: A Systematic Literature Review Enhancing Students’ Learning Outcomes through MALL in English Intensive Program for Railway Mechanical Technology Designing Research-Based Teacher-Appraisal Forms: A Case Of Effective EAP Lecturers in Swaziland Assessing the Nexus of EFL Learners’ Academic Self-concept and Their Formal English Vocabulary Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1