评估极端天气保险的最佳做法和建立更有弹性的社会的方向

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions Pub Date : 2020-05-26 DOI:10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148
P. Hudson, L. T. Ruig, M. D. Ruiter, O. Kuik, W. Botzen, X. L. Den, Matilda Persson, Audrey Benoist, C. Nielsen
{"title":"评估极端天气保险的最佳做法和建立更有弹性的社会的方向","authors":"P. Hudson, L. T. Ruig, M. D. Ruiter, O. Kuik, W. Botzen, X. L. Den, Matilda Persson, Audrey Benoist, C. Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Extreme weather resilience has been defined as being based on three pillars: resistance (the ability to lower impacts), recovery (the ability to bounce back), and adaptive capacity (the ability to learn and improve). These resilience pillars are important both before and after the occurrence of extreme weather events. Extreme weather insurance can influence these pillars of resilience depending on how particular insurance mechanisms are structured. We explore how the lessons learnt from the current best insurance practices can improve resilience to extreme weather events. We employ an extensive inventory of private property and agricultural crop insurance mechanisms to conduct a multi-criteria analysis of insurance market outcomes. We draw conclusions regarding the patterns in the best practice from six European countries to increase resilience. We suggest that requirements to buy a bundle extreme weather event insurance with general insurance packages are strengthened and supported with structures to financing losses through public-private partnerships. Moreover, support for low income households through income vouchers could be provided. Similarly, for the agricultural sector we propose moving towards comprehensive crop yield insurance linked to general agricultural subsidies. In both cases a nationally representative body can coordinate the various stakeholders into acting in concert.","PeriodicalId":47335,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society\",\"authors\":\"P. Hudson, L. T. Ruig, M. D. Ruiter, O. Kuik, W. Botzen, X. L. Den, Matilda Persson, Audrey Benoist, C. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Extreme weather resilience has been defined as being based on three pillars: resistance (the ability to lower impacts), recovery (the ability to bounce back), and adaptive capacity (the ability to learn and improve). These resilience pillars are important both before and after the occurrence of extreme weather events. Extreme weather insurance can influence these pillars of resilience depending on how particular insurance mechanisms are structured. We explore how the lessons learnt from the current best insurance practices can improve resilience to extreme weather events. We employ an extensive inventory of private property and agricultural crop insurance mechanisms to conduct a multi-criteria analysis of insurance market outcomes. We draw conclusions regarding the patterns in the best practice from six European countries to increase resilience. We suggest that requirements to buy a bundle extreme weather event insurance with general insurance packages are strengthened and supported with structures to financing losses through public-private partnerships. Moreover, support for low income households through income vouchers could be provided. Similarly, for the agricultural sector we propose moving towards comprehensive crop yield insurance linked to general agricultural subsidies. In both cases a nationally representative body can coordinate the various stakeholders into acting in concert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

极端天气恢复能力被定义为基于三个支柱:抵抗(降低影响的能力),恢复(反弹的能力)和适应能力(学习和改进的能力)。这些恢复力支柱在极端天气事件发生之前和之后都很重要。极端天气保险可以影响这些弹性支柱,这取决于特定保险机制的结构。我们将探讨从当前最佳保险实践中吸取的经验教训如何提高对极端天气事件的抵御能力。我们采用广泛的私有财产和农作物保险机制清单,对保险市场结果进行多标准分析。我们从六个欧洲国家的最佳实践模式中得出结论,以提高弹性。我们建议加强对购买极端天气事件捆绑保险和一般保险包的要求,并通过公私伙伴关系为损失融资提供结构支持。此外,可以通过收入券向低收入家庭提供支助。同样,对于农业部门,我们建议采取与一般农业补贴挂钩的综合作物产量保险。在这两种情况下,具有国家代表性的机构都可以协调各利益攸关方采取一致行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society
ABSTRACT Extreme weather resilience has been defined as being based on three pillars: resistance (the ability to lower impacts), recovery (the ability to bounce back), and adaptive capacity (the ability to learn and improve). These resilience pillars are important both before and after the occurrence of extreme weather events. Extreme weather insurance can influence these pillars of resilience depending on how particular insurance mechanisms are structured. We explore how the lessons learnt from the current best insurance practices can improve resilience to extreme weather events. We employ an extensive inventory of private property and agricultural crop insurance mechanisms to conduct a multi-criteria analysis of insurance market outcomes. We draw conclusions regarding the patterns in the best practice from six European countries to increase resilience. We suggest that requirements to buy a bundle extreme weather event insurance with general insurance packages are strengthened and supported with structures to financing losses through public-private partnerships. Moreover, support for low income households through income vouchers could be provided. Similarly, for the agricultural sector we propose moving towards comprehensive crop yield insurance linked to general agricultural subsidies. In both cases a nationally representative body can coordinate the various stakeholders into acting in concert.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Dimensions is an innovative, interdisciplinary and international research journal addressing the human and policy dimensions of hazards. The journal addresses the full range of hazardous events from extreme geological, hydrological, atmospheric and biological events, such as earthquakes, floods, storms and epidemics, to technological failures and malfunctions, such as industrial explosions, fires and toxic material releases. Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Dimensions is the source of the new ideas in hazards and risk research.
期刊最新文献
The impact of sinkholes on crop choices in water-scarce regions Trends and future research in climate migration: a bibliometric analysis of forty years Multi-directional communication between decision makers and environmental health researchers: a qualitative inquiry Method for prioritising buildings for seismic reinforcement based on prediction of earthquake-induced building collapse and evacuation routes Is the number of global natural disasters increasing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1