暴露的不确定性:地理信息系统与现实世界相遇的野外实验室练习

Stephen P. Prisley, Candice Luebbering
{"title":"暴露的不确定性:地理信息系统与现实世界相遇的野外实验室练习","authors":"Stephen P. Prisley,&nbsp;Candice Luebbering","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students in natural resources programs commonly take courses in geospatial technologies. An awareness of the uncertainty of spatial data and algorithms can be an important outcome of such courses. This article describes a laboratory exercise in a graduate geographic information system (GIS) class that involves collection of data for the assessment of spatial uncertainty. Students delineate a forest clearing using digital aerial photographs and global positioning system (GPS) receivers. They also measure terrain attributes such as slope, elevation, and aspect at nine selected points in the field and extract similar measures for those locations from a GIS elevation dataset. Collating data from students and groups yields a rich dataset of multiple observations. This dataset is then analyzed to develop estimates of uncertainty such as standard deviation and root mean square error (RMSE). Results from a recent lab exercise indicate that area of a forest clearing had coefficients of variation of 11.5% for delineations from aerial photographs and 7.6% from GPS delineations. The RMSE for GPS <i>X</i> coordinate, GPS <i>Y</i> coordinate, and elevation at nine terrain measurement points were 5.3, 7.1, and 3.4 m, respectively. The RMSE for slope percent was 4%, and the GIS-based slope estimate was within the range of field estimates at only seven of nine points. The RMSE for field-measured aspect was nearly 17 degrees. An online assessment of the lab exercise indicated that most students found the exercise was worth the class time devoted to it, and many students gained valuable insights about spatial uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"144-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty Exposed: A Field Lab Exercise Where GIS Meets the Real World\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P. Prisley,&nbsp;Candice Luebbering\",\"doi\":\"10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Students in natural resources programs commonly take courses in geospatial technologies. An awareness of the uncertainty of spatial data and algorithms can be an important outcome of such courses. This article describes a laboratory exercise in a graduate geographic information system (GIS) class that involves collection of data for the assessment of spatial uncertainty. Students delineate a forest clearing using digital aerial photographs and global positioning system (GPS) receivers. They also measure terrain attributes such as slope, elevation, and aspect at nine selected points in the field and extract similar measures for those locations from a GIS elevation dataset. Collating data from students and groups yields a rich dataset of multiple observations. This dataset is then analyzed to develop estimates of uncertainty such as standard deviation and root mean square error (RMSE). Results from a recent lab exercise indicate that area of a forest clearing had coefficients of variation of 11.5% for delineations from aerial photographs and 7.6% from GPS delineations. The RMSE for GPS <i>X</i> coordinate, GPS <i>Y</i> coordinate, and elevation at nine terrain measurement points were 5.3, 7.1, and 3.4 m, respectively. The RMSE for slope percent was 4%, and the GIS-based slope estimate was within the range of field estimates at only seven of nine points. The RMSE for field-measured aspect was nearly 17 degrees. An online assessment of the lab exercise indicated that most students found the exercise was worth the class time devoted to it, and many students gained valuable insights about spatial uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"144-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2011.0001g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然资源专业的学生通常学习地理空间技术。对空间数据和算法的不确定性的认识可能是此类课程的重要成果。本文描述了研究生地理信息系统(GIS)课堂上的一个实验室练习,该练习涉及收集用于评估空间不确定性的数据。学生们用数码航空照片和全球定位系统(GPS)接收器描绘一片森林空地。他们还在野外的9个选定点测量地形属性,如坡度、高程和坡向,并从GIS高程数据集中提取这些位置的类似测量值。整理来自学生和团体的数据产生了丰富的多个观察数据集。然后对该数据集进行分析,以得出不确定性的估计,如标准差和均方根误差(RMSE)。最近的一项实验室实验结果表明,森林空地面积的变化系数在航空照片中为11.5%,在GPS中为7.6%。9个地形测点GPS X坐标、GPS Y坐标和高程的均方根误差分别为5.3、7.1和3.4 m。坡度百分比的RMSE为4%,基于gis的坡度估计值仅在9个点中的7个点的范围内。实测坡向的RMSE接近17度。对实验练习的在线评估表明,大多数学生认为这个练习值得投入课堂时间,许多学生获得了关于空间不确定性的宝贵见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty Exposed: A Field Lab Exercise Where GIS Meets the Real World

Students in natural resources programs commonly take courses in geospatial technologies. An awareness of the uncertainty of spatial data and algorithms can be an important outcome of such courses. This article describes a laboratory exercise in a graduate geographic information system (GIS) class that involves collection of data for the assessment of spatial uncertainty. Students delineate a forest clearing using digital aerial photographs and global positioning system (GPS) receivers. They also measure terrain attributes such as slope, elevation, and aspect at nine selected points in the field and extract similar measures for those locations from a GIS elevation dataset. Collating data from students and groups yields a rich dataset of multiple observations. This dataset is then analyzed to develop estimates of uncertainty such as standard deviation and root mean square error (RMSE). Results from a recent lab exercise indicate that area of a forest clearing had coefficients of variation of 11.5% for delineations from aerial photographs and 7.6% from GPS delineations. The RMSE for GPS X coordinate, GPS Y coordinate, and elevation at nine terrain measurement points were 5.3, 7.1, and 3.4 m, respectively. The RMSE for slope percent was 4%, and the GIS-based slope estimate was within the range of field estimates at only seven of nine points. The RMSE for field-measured aspect was nearly 17 degrees. An online assessment of the lab exercise indicated that most students found the exercise was worth the class time devoted to it, and many students gained valuable insights about spatial uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1