减轻定量液相色谱-串联质谱法中分析物与稳定同位素标记内标交叉信号的影响。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Pub Date : 2022-04-26 eCollection Date: 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002
Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris
{"title":"减轻定量液相色谱-串联质谱法中分析物与稳定同位素标记内标交叉信号的影响。","authors":"Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using the SIL-IS isotope <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating analyte to stable isotope labelled internal standard cross-signal contribution in quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.\",\"authors\":\"Mirjana Radovanovic, Graham Jones, Richard O Day, Peter Galettis, Ross L G Norris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (<i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When using the SIL-IS isotope <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.04.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 LC-MS/MS 药物定量分析中使用稳定同位素标记的内标(SIL-IS)是最广泛使用的方法,用于对样品定量过程中的变异性进行归一化处理。然而,含有硫、氯或溴等原子的化合物可能会导致天然同位素对 SIL-IS 产生交叉信号,从而导致非线性校准曲线。本文介绍了一种减轻这种影响的简单而新颖的方法。该方法需要监测一种含量较低的 SIL-IS 同位素,作为前体离子,其质量不含/极少量来自被分析同位素的同位素贡献:实验在两台 LC-MS/MS 分析仪上进行:实验在两台 LC-MS/MS 分析仪上进行:Waters Xevo TQ-S 和 Shimadzu 8050。以氟氯西林(FLX)为例。为 FLX 选择了两个跃迁(m/z 454 → 160 → 295),为 SIL-IS 同位素各选择了一个跃迁(同位素 457 g/mol 的跃迁为 m/z 458 → 160,同位素 459 g/mol 的跃迁为 m/z 460 → 160)。在三种 SIL-IS 浓度下对化验偏差进行了评估:结果:当使用浓度为 0.7 mg/L 的 SIL-IS 同位素 m/z 458 → 160 时,两台仪器的偏差均高达 36.9%。将 SIL-IS 浓度提高到 14 毫克/升后,偏差降低到 5.8%。在 SIL-IS 浓度为 0.7 毫克/升时,使用含量较低的同位素 m/z 460 → 160 会导致 13.9% 的偏差:结论:采用这种方法可以减少分析同位素对相应 SIL-IS 的交叉信号贡献,最大限度地减少 SIL-IS 的使用,从而降低总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mitigating analyte to stable isotope labelled internal standard cross-signal contribution in quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Background: Utilising stable isotope labelled internal standards (SIL-IS) in quantitative LC-MS/MS drug analysis is the most widely used approach to normalise for variability during sample quantification processes. However, compounds containing atoms such as Sulphur, Chlorine or Bromine, could potentially cause cross-signal contribution to the SIL-IS from the naturally occurring isotopes, resulting in non-linear calibration curves. A simple, novel method of mitigating the effect is presented here. It entails monitoring of a less abundant SIL-IS isotope, as the precursor ion, of a mass that has no/minimal isotopic contribution from the analyte isotopes.

Methods: Experiments were conducted on two LC-MS/MS analysers: Waters Xevo TQ-S and Shimadzu 8050. Flucloxacillin (FLX) was used as an example. Two transitions were selected for FLX (m/z 454 → 160 → 295) and one for each of the SIL-IS isotopes (m/z 458 → 160 for the isotope 457 g/mol and m/z 460 → 160 for the isotope 459 g/mol). Assay biases were assessed at three SIL-IS concentrations: 0.7, 7 and 14 mg/L for each isotope.

Results: When using the SIL-IS isotope m/z 458 → 160 at a concentration of 0.7 mg/L, biases were up to 36.9 % on both instruments. Increasing the SIL-IS concentration to 14 mg/L, reduced the bias to 5.8 %. Using the less abundant isotope, m/z 460 → 160, resulted in biases of 13.9 % at an SIL-IS concentration of 0.7 mg/L.

Conclusions: Applying this method will mitigate cross-signal contribution from the analyte isotopes to the corresponding SIL-IS, minimise the use of SIL-IS, and, thereby, reduce overall cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of internal standard selection on measurement results for long chain fatty acids in blood Comparison between a single- and a multi-point calibration method using LC-MS/MS for measurement of 5-fluorouracil in human plasma Rapid identification of SARS CoV-2 omicron sub-variant JN.1 (BA.2.86.1.1) with mass spectrometry Isotope-dilution-LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure for cefepime in human serum Understanding isotopes, isomers, and isobars in mass spectrometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1