专利有效性与诉讼:来自美国当事人间复审的证据

C. Helmers, B. Love
{"title":"专利有效性与诉讼:来自美国当事人间复审的证据","authors":"C. Helmers, B. Love","doi":"10.1086/721911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infringement litigation. A party accused of patent infringement in the United States may—in parallel with defending itself in court—challenge the validity of the allegedly infringed patent by petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an administrative tribunal in the US Patent and Trademark Office. Review by PTAB generates new information about the validity of challenged patents, and we study empirically the resulting effect on settlement of an accused infringer’s decision to file a petition to challenge a patent’s validity and, conditional on the filing of a petition, the PTAB’s initial decision to grant or deny the petition on the basis of its assessment of a reasonable likelihood of invalidity. We find that both decision points have large, positive effects on the settlement of parallel court proceedings.","PeriodicalId":22657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"21 1","pages":"53 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patent Validity and Litigation: Evidence from US Inter Partes Review\",\"authors\":\"C. Helmers, B. Love\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infringement litigation. A party accused of patent infringement in the United States may—in parallel with defending itself in court—challenge the validity of the allegedly infringed patent by petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an administrative tribunal in the US Patent and Trademark Office. Review by PTAB generates new information about the validity of challenged patents, and we study empirically the resulting effect on settlement of an accused infringer’s decision to file a petition to challenge a patent’s validity and, conditional on the filing of a petition, the PTAB’s initial decision to grant or deny the petition on the basis of its assessment of a reasonable likelihood of invalidity. We find that both decision points have large, positive effects on the settlement of parallel court proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了关于专利有效性的新信息如何影响专利侵权诉讼的解决。在美国,被指控侵犯专利的一方在法庭上为自己辩护的同时,可以向专利审判和上诉委员会(PTAB)——美国专利商标局的一个行政法庭——请愿,质疑被指控侵犯专利的有效性。PTAB的审查产生了关于被质疑专利有效性的新信息,我们从经验上研究了由此产生的对被指控侵权人提出专利有效性质疑的决定的影响,以及PTAB基于其对合理的无效可能性的评估而做出的批准或拒绝申请的初步决定的影响。我们发现,这两个决策点对平行法院诉讼的解决都有很大的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patent Validity and Litigation: Evidence from US Inter Partes Review
We analyze how new information about the validity of a patent impacts the settlement of patent infringement litigation. A party accused of patent infringement in the United States may—in parallel with defending itself in court—challenge the validity of the allegedly infringed patent by petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an administrative tribunal in the US Patent and Trademark Office. Review by PTAB generates new information about the validity of challenged patents, and we study empirically the resulting effect on settlement of an accused infringer’s decision to file a petition to challenge a patent’s validity and, conditional on the filing of a petition, the PTAB’s initial decision to grant or deny the petition on the basis of its assessment of a reasonable likelihood of invalidity. We find that both decision points have large, positive effects on the settlement of parallel court proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lion’s Share: Evidence from Federal Contracts on the Value of Political Connections Loans to Chapter 11 Firms: Contract Design, Repayment Risk, and Pricing Dynamic Decision-Making under Rolling Admissions: Evidence from US Law School Applications Does Voluntary Financial Disclosure Matter? The Case of Fairness Opinions in Mergers and Acquisitions Partisan Gerrymandering and Turnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1