护士视角下新生儿重症监护室姑息治疗障碍:一项质性研究

N. Sadeghi, Seyyd Amir Hossein Hesami, S. Sadeghi, M. Sadeghi
{"title":"护士视角下新生儿重症监护室姑息治疗障碍:一项质性研究","authors":"N. Sadeghi, Seyyd Amir Hossein Hesami, S. Sadeghi, M. Sadeghi","doi":"10.5812/msnj.120664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses recommend that palliative care be provided as standard care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: The present study aimed to explain the nurses' experiences of barriers to palliative care in NICUs. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach in NICUs of Beheshti and Amin hospitals in Isfahan in 2020. The data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews with 12 nurses who had palliative and end-of-life care experiences for infants and families. The nurses were selected using purposive sampling. The duration of each interview varied from 25 to 50 minutes. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis conducted inductively with Graham and Lundman’s approach. The criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln were used to ensure the credibility and reliability of the data. Results: Three main categories were extracted from the data, including unfavorable conditions (subcategorized into “unsuitable physical environment” and “shortage of nurses”), nurse's mental problems (with the subcategories of “nurses’ mental problems in providing neonatal care” and “nurses’ mental problems in providing family care”) and challenges ahead (with the subcategories of \"parental presence challenge” and “doctor's instructions challenge”). Conclusions: The findings of the present study revealed the barriers to palliative care for infants and families in NICUs. Given the importance of palliative care in NICUs, effective measures must be taken to overcome these barriers.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Palliative Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from Nurses’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Sadeghi, Seyyd Amir Hossein Hesami, S. Sadeghi, M. Sadeghi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/msnj.120664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses recommend that palliative care be provided as standard care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: The present study aimed to explain the nurses' experiences of barriers to palliative care in NICUs. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach in NICUs of Beheshti and Amin hospitals in Isfahan in 2020. The data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews with 12 nurses who had palliative and end-of-life care experiences for infants and families. The nurses were selected using purposive sampling. The duration of each interview varied from 25 to 50 minutes. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis conducted inductively with Graham and Lundman’s approach. The criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln were used to ensure the credibility and reliability of the data. Results: Three main categories were extracted from the data, including unfavorable conditions (subcategorized into “unsuitable physical environment” and “shortage of nurses”), nurse's mental problems (with the subcategories of “nurses’ mental problems in providing neonatal care” and “nurses’ mental problems in providing family care”) and challenges ahead (with the subcategories of \\\"parental presence challenge” and “doctor's instructions challenge”). Conclusions: The findings of the present study revealed the barriers to palliative care for infants and families in NICUs. Given the importance of palliative care in NICUs, effective measures must be taken to overcome these barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.120664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.120664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:美国儿科学会和全国新生儿护士协会推荐姑息治疗作为新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的标准护理。目的:本研究旨在解释重症监护病房护士对姑息治疗障碍的体会。方法:采用内容分析法对伊斯法罕市Beheshti和Amin医院2020年新生儿重症监护病房进行定性研究。数据是通过半结构化的深度访谈收集的,采访了12名护士,他们都有过对婴儿和家庭进行姑息治疗和临终关怀的经历。采用目的抽样法对护士进行抽样调查。每次面试的时间从25分钟到50分钟不等。数据分析采用传统的定性内容分析进行归纳格雷厄姆和伦德曼的方法。采用Guba和Lincoln提出的标准来确保数据的可信度和可靠性。结果:从数据中提取出三个主要类别,包括不利条件(细分为“不适宜的物理环境”和“护士短缺”)、护士心理问题(细分为“护士提供新生儿护理的心理问题”和“护士提供家庭护理的心理问题”)和未来挑战(细分为“父母在场挑战”和“医生指导挑战”)。结论:本研究结果揭示了新生儿重症监护病房婴儿及其家庭姑息治疗的障碍。鉴于姑息治疗在新生儿重症监护室的重要性,必须采取有效措施克服这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to Palliative Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from Nurses’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study
Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses recommend that palliative care be provided as standard care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: The present study aimed to explain the nurses' experiences of barriers to palliative care in NICUs. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach in NICUs of Beheshti and Amin hospitals in Isfahan in 2020. The data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews with 12 nurses who had palliative and end-of-life care experiences for infants and families. The nurses were selected using purposive sampling. The duration of each interview varied from 25 to 50 minutes. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis conducted inductively with Graham and Lundman’s approach. The criteria proposed by Guba and Lincoln were used to ensure the credibility and reliability of the data. Results: Three main categories were extracted from the data, including unfavorable conditions (subcategorized into “unsuitable physical environment” and “shortage of nurses”), nurse's mental problems (with the subcategories of “nurses’ mental problems in providing neonatal care” and “nurses’ mental problems in providing family care”) and challenges ahead (with the subcategories of "parental presence challenge” and “doctor's instructions challenge”). Conclusions: The findings of the present study revealed the barriers to palliative care for infants and families in NICUs. Given the importance of palliative care in NICUs, effective measures must be taken to overcome these barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of ACT and DBT-Based Interventions with and without Exercise on Pain Outcomes and Desire for Treatment in Substance-Dependent Patients with Chronic Pain Effect of Self-efficacy-Based Training on Treatment Adherence of Patients with Heart Failure The Effect of an Exercise Program on the Quality of Life in Burn Patients Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis Effect of Mobile Health Self-Care Training on Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1