Stewart L. Macdonald, M. Bradford, Adam McKeown, E. Vanderduys, A. Hoskins, D. Westcott
{"title":"小红狐(Pteropus scapulatus)在昆士兰营地生境的偏好","authors":"Stewart L. Macdonald, M. Bradford, Adam McKeown, E. Vanderduys, A. Hoskins, D. Westcott","doi":"10.1071/zo20079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Urban fl ying-fox camps are a major source of human – wildlife con fl ict, producing noise, odour, vegetation damage, property damage, and concerns about disease. Although there is a signi fi cant demand in many communities for bat camps to be dispersed, there is limited information on how such dispersal can be conducted effectively. Determining the habitat characteristics fl ying-foxes use when selecting a camp site is key to understanding why they establish camps where they do and to where they might move if dispersed. We characterised little red fl ying-fox (LRFF) camp habitat at two spatial scales: fl oristics and vegetation structure at the local scale, and climatic and landscape characteristics at the broad scale. We found weak associations with local-scale tree and shrub height and cover, and stronger associations with increased Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (a measure of ‘ greenness ’ ) and decreased distance to nearest watercourse. These relationships were not strong enough to explain all variation in the model, suggesting that there are other factors, such as social cues, that could also in fl uence camp site selection. Our results suggest that minor modi fi cations to existing or proposed camp sites will be unlikely to repel or attract LRFFs, as other factors are likely to play key roles in the formation of camp sites for this species.","PeriodicalId":55420,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Zoology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Camp site habitat preferences of the little red flying-fox (Pteropus scapulatus) in Queensland\",\"authors\":\"Stewart L. Macdonald, M. Bradford, Adam McKeown, E. Vanderduys, A. Hoskins, D. Westcott\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/zo20079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Urban fl ying-fox camps are a major source of human – wildlife con fl ict, producing noise, odour, vegetation damage, property damage, and concerns about disease. Although there is a signi fi cant demand in many communities for bat camps to be dispersed, there is limited information on how such dispersal can be conducted effectively. Determining the habitat characteristics fl ying-foxes use when selecting a camp site is key to understanding why they establish camps where they do and to where they might move if dispersed. We characterised little red fl ying-fox (LRFF) camp habitat at two spatial scales: fl oristics and vegetation structure at the local scale, and climatic and landscape characteristics at the broad scale. We found weak associations with local-scale tree and shrub height and cover, and stronger associations with increased Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (a measure of ‘ greenness ’ ) and decreased distance to nearest watercourse. These relationships were not strong enough to explain all variation in the model, suggesting that there are other factors, such as social cues, that could also in fl uence camp site selection. Our results suggest that minor modi fi cations to existing or proposed camp sites will be unlikely to repel or attract LRFFs, as other factors are likely to play key roles in the formation of camp sites for this species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/zo20079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/zo20079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Camp site habitat preferences of the little red flying-fox (Pteropus scapulatus) in Queensland
. Urban fl ying-fox camps are a major source of human – wildlife con fl ict, producing noise, odour, vegetation damage, property damage, and concerns about disease. Although there is a signi fi cant demand in many communities for bat camps to be dispersed, there is limited information on how such dispersal can be conducted effectively. Determining the habitat characteristics fl ying-foxes use when selecting a camp site is key to understanding why they establish camps where they do and to where they might move if dispersed. We characterised little red fl ying-fox (LRFF) camp habitat at two spatial scales: fl oristics and vegetation structure at the local scale, and climatic and landscape characteristics at the broad scale. We found weak associations with local-scale tree and shrub height and cover, and stronger associations with increased Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (a measure of ‘ greenness ’ ) and decreased distance to nearest watercourse. These relationships were not strong enough to explain all variation in the model, suggesting that there are other factors, such as social cues, that could also in fl uence camp site selection. Our results suggest that minor modi fi cations to existing or proposed camp sites will be unlikely to repel or attract LRFFs, as other factors are likely to play key roles in the formation of camp sites for this species.
期刊介绍:
Australian Journal of Zoology is an international journal publishing contributions on evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology. The journal focuses on Australasian fauna but also includes high-quality research from any region that has broader practical or theoretical relevance or that demonstrates a conceptual advance to any aspect of zoology. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: anatomy, physiology, molecular biology, genetics, reproductive biology, developmental biology, parasitology, morphology, behaviour, ecology, zoogeography, systematics and evolution.
Australian Journal of Zoology is a valuable resource for professional zoologists, research scientists, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs interested in any aspect of the scientific study of animals.
Australian Journal of Zoology is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.