术后切除技术:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2020-06-04 DOI:10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.09
Laís Dornelles Bianchini, B. M. Vetromilla, J. Skupien, C. Soares, T. Pereira-Cenci
{"title":"术后切除技术:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Laís Dornelles Bianchini, B. M. Vetromilla, J. Skupien, C. Soares, T. Pereira-Cenci","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This systematic review aimed to answer what is the best way to remove prefabricated metallic, fiber or cast metal posts.  \nMethodology: An electronic search was conducted in Medline and Scopus databases to identify clinical and in vitro studies that assessed post removal techniques from 1950 to October 2018. Tables were generated to summarize the included studies and reports were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the force necessary to remove posts (α=5%).  \nResults: Of the 2,951 studies identified in the initial search, 33 were selected. The duration of using ultrasonic vibrations (and the number of surfaces where the vibration was applied) led to less time spent and less force needed to dislodge a metal post. Dentist’s expertise (more than 10 years) was also related to easier post removal. The use of adhesive cements resulted in a more difficult protocol for post removal.  \nConclusions: Although there is need for more consistent results, the data summarized and meta-analysis points toward the use of ultrasonic energy as the first option to remove posts, with best results for metal posts.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post removal techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laís Dornelles Bianchini, B. M. Vetromilla, J. Skupien, C. Soares, T. Pereira-Cenci\",\"doi\":\"10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This systematic review aimed to answer what is the best way to remove prefabricated metallic, fiber or cast metal posts.  \\nMethodology: An electronic search was conducted in Medline and Scopus databases to identify clinical and in vitro studies that assessed post removal techniques from 1950 to October 2018. Tables were generated to summarize the included studies and reports were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the force necessary to remove posts (α=5%).  \\nResults: Of the 2,951 studies identified in the initial search, 33 were selected. The duration of using ultrasonic vibrations (and the number of surfaces where the vibration was applied) led to less time spent and less force needed to dislodge a metal post. Dentist’s expertise (more than 10 years) was also related to easier post removal. The use of adhesive cements resulted in a more difficult protocol for post removal.  \\nConclusions: Although there is need for more consistent results, the data summarized and meta-analysis points toward the use of ultrasonic energy as the first option to remove posts, with best results for metal posts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在回答什么是去除预制金属,纤维或铸造金属桩的最佳方法。方法:在Medline和Scopus数据库中进行电子检索,以确定1950年至2018年10月评估去除后技术的临床和体外研究。生成表格来总结纳入的研究,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估报告的偏倚。进行meta分析以评估移除岗位所需的力量(α=5%)。结果:在最初的检索中确定的2951项研究中,有33项被选中。使用超声波振动的持续时间(以及施加振动的表面数量)导致花费更少的时间和更少的力来移除金属柱。牙医的专业知识(超过10年)也与更容易拔出后牙有关。粘接性水泥的使用使得后处理更加困难。结论:虽然需要更一致的结果,但数据总结和荟萃分析表明,使用超声能量作为去除桩的第一选择,金属桩的效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post removal techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Aim: This systematic review aimed to answer what is the best way to remove prefabricated metallic, fiber or cast metal posts.  Methodology: An electronic search was conducted in Medline and Scopus databases to identify clinical and in vitro studies that assessed post removal techniques from 1950 to October 2018. Tables were generated to summarize the included studies and reports were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the force necessary to remove posts (α=5%).  Results: Of the 2,951 studies identified in the initial search, 33 were selected. The duration of using ultrasonic vibrations (and the number of surfaces where the vibration was applied) led to less time spent and less force needed to dislodge a metal post. Dentist’s expertise (more than 10 years) was also related to easier post removal. The use of adhesive cements resulted in a more difficult protocol for post removal.  Conclusions: Although there is need for more consistent results, the data summarized and meta-analysis points toward the use of ultrasonic energy as the first option to remove posts, with best results for metal posts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of Depotphoresis and diode laser for reduction of microbial load and postoperative pain, and healing of periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial Endodontics: clinical protocols on scientific basis Anatomical proximity of upper teeth and local factors associated with the thickness of the maxillary sinus membrane: a retrospective study A contemporary approach to treat necrotic immature teeth using different bioceramic materials Endodontic guides and ultrasonic tips for management of calcifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1