{"title":"“古怪的存在”:大卫·H·凯尔西·库尔(David H . Kelsey)的《古怪的存在》","authors":"Nadia Marais","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Eccentric Existence”: David H Kelsey on theocentric human dignity Discourses on human dignity presuppose specific anthropologies, that respond to the question as to what a human being is. David Kelsey’s recently published theological anthropology, Eccentric Existence (2009), provides a particular view on what it means to be human and, in turn, what the dignity of human beings entails. This article distinguishes between five perspectives and two discourses on human dignity, and proceeds to analyse Kelsey’s understanding of human dignity with a possible contribution to these discourses and perspectives in mind. It is argued that Kelsey’s work could identify with both the discourse on justice and the discourse on flourishing, and that Kelsey’s insistence that the dignity of human beings lie outside of themselves safeguards that dignity in the “eccentric existence” of human beings.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Eccentric Existence”: David H Kelsey oor teosentriese menswaardigheid\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Marais\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-3-4-379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Eccentric Existence”: David H Kelsey on theocentric human dignity Discourses on human dignity presuppose specific anthropologies, that respond to the question as to what a human being is. David Kelsey’s recently published theological anthropology, Eccentric Existence (2009), provides a particular view on what it means to be human and, in turn, what the dignity of human beings entails. This article distinguishes between five perspectives and two discourses on human dignity, and proceeds to analyse Kelsey’s understanding of human dignity with a possible contribution to these discourses and perspectives in mind. It is argued that Kelsey’s work could identify with both the discourse on justice and the discourse on flourishing, and that Kelsey’s insistence that the dignity of human beings lie outside of themselves safeguards that dignity in the “eccentric existence” of human beings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“古怪的存在”:David H Kelsey论以神为中心的人的尊严关于人的尊严的论述预设了特定的人类学,它回应了人是什么这个问题。大卫·凯尔西(David Kelsey)最近出版的神学人类学著作《古怪的存在》(2009)提供了一种特殊的观点,即作为人类意味着什么,反过来,人类的尊严意味着什么。本文区分了关于人类尊严的五种观点和两种话语,并分析了凯尔西对人类尊严的理解,并考虑到这些话语和观点的可能贡献。本文认为,凯尔西的作品既可以认同正义话语,也可以认同繁荣话语,凯尔西坚持认为人的尊严存在于自身之外,从而保障了人类“古怪存在”的尊严。
“Eccentric Existence”: David H Kelsey oor teosentriese menswaardigheid
“Eccentric Existence”: David H Kelsey on theocentric human dignity Discourses on human dignity presuppose specific anthropologies, that respond to the question as to what a human being is. David Kelsey’s recently published theological anthropology, Eccentric Existence (2009), provides a particular view on what it means to be human and, in turn, what the dignity of human beings entails. This article distinguishes between five perspectives and two discourses on human dignity, and proceeds to analyse Kelsey’s understanding of human dignity with a possible contribution to these discourses and perspectives in mind. It is argued that Kelsey’s work could identify with both the discourse on justice and the discourse on flourishing, and that Kelsey’s insistence that the dignity of human beings lie outside of themselves safeguards that dignity in the “eccentric existence” of human beings.